UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.  )


Filed by the Registrant

 ☑


Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐


Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12


RigNet, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)


Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) (1) and 0-11.


 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 (5)Total fee paid:
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.


 (1)Amount Previously Paid:

 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 (3)Filing Party:
 (4)Date Filed:

 

(RIGNET)

NOTICE OF

2017

2019 ANNUAL MEETING

OF STOCKHOLDERS

Time and Date:10:8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time, May 3, 20178, 2019
Location:Houston Marriot Energy Corridor – Reata BallroomRigNet, Inc., 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300
 16011 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas 7709477084


April 3, 2017

8, 2019


Dear Stockholder:


You are cordially invited to attend the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of RigNet, Inc. (the “Company” or “RigNet”), which will be held at 10:8:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 3, 20178, 2019 at the Houston Marriot Energy Corridor – Reata Ballroom, 16011 Katy Freeway,RigNet’s headquarters located at 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77094.77084.  Following a report onRigNet’sbusiness operations, stockholdersStockholders will vote to:


(LOGO)(GRAPHIC)Elect the nine directors named in our proxy statement to serve until the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified;qualified or until the earliest of their removal, resignation or death;

(LOGO)(GRAPHIC)Ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2017;2019;

(LOGO)(GRAPHIC)Advise onApprove the frequency of voting on our named executive officers’ compensation asRigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and
(GRAPHIC)Approve a non-binding advisory vote; andresolution on RigNet’s executive compensation.

(LOGO)Approve our named executive officers’ compensation as a non-binding advisory vote.


Stockholders will also consider any other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.


You are eligible to vote if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 6, 2017.14, 2019.  Please ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting by promptly voting and submitting your proxy on the Internet or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the enclosed envelope.  If you decide to attend the meeting and vote, you may withdraw your proxy at that time.


To assist you in voting your shares, in addition to this Notice of Annual Meeting, you will find enclosed the 20172019 Proxy Statement and our 20162018 Annual Report to Stockholders, which includes the Company’s audited financial statements.


On behalf of the Board of Directors and employees of RigNet, we thank you for your continued interest in and support of the Company.


Sincerely,   
    
/s/ James H. Browning /s/ William D. SuttonShelly Buchman 
James H. BrowningWilliam D. SuttonShelly Buchman
Chairman of the BoardSenior Vice President, andRigNet Connect, Associate General Counsel
Houston, Texas and Corporate Secretary

Houston, Texas

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at “https:https://materials.proxyvote.com/766582”

766582


Your vote is important.  Please vote promptly.

i

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the proxy statement.  This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.


RIGNET 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

Time and Date:10:8:00 a.m. Central Daylight Time, May 3, 20178, 2019
Location:Houston Marriot Energy Corridor – Reata BallroomRigNet, Inc., 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300
 16011 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas 7709477084


Voting. Stockholders as of the record date, March 6, 2017,14, 2019, are entitled to vote.  Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals on which to be voted.

Each stockholder’s vote is important.  Even if you plan to attend our Annual Meeting in person, please cast your vote as soon as possible by:

(LOGO)

using the Internet at


https://materials.proxyvote.com/766582”

766582

 
(LOGO)

mailing your signed proxy or voting


instruction form

Attendance. RigNet stockholders as of the record date or holders of their valid proxies are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting.


MEETING AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS

 
Page Reference
for More
Information

Vote
Recommendation

Election of 9 directors 4 and 4241
For
each director nominee
Management proposal:proposals:  
Ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2017201941For
Approve the RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan42For
Stockholder advisory vote:  
Advise on the frequency ofadvisory voting on our named executive officers’ compensation43One
Approve our named executive officers’ compensation4348For
Transact other business that properly comes before the meeting  


BOARD NOMINEES

  Director   Committee MembershipOther Board Service
NameAgeSincePosition with Our CompanyIndependentACCCCGNCDCExperience
Steven E. Pickett532016Chief Executive Officer and President     X
James H. Browning672010Chairman, Independent DirectorXX/FX  X* X
Mattia Caprioli432013Independent DirectorX  X  XX
Charles L. Davis512005Independent DirectorX    X 
Ditlef de Vibe622011Independent DirectorX X   X 
Kevin Mulloy582012Independent DirectorXX    C 
Kevin J. O’Hara562010Independent DirectorX XC X
Keith Olsen602010Independent DirectorX CX X
Brent K. Whittington462010Independent DirectorXC/F  X 
2016 Meetings    4643 

 NameAge
Director
Since
 Position with Our CompanyInde-pendentCommittee MembershipOther Board Service Experience
ACCCCGNCDC
 Steven E. Pickett552016 Chief Executive Officer and President
    X
 James H. Browning692010 Chairman, Independent DirectorXX/FX  X
 Mattia Caprioli452013 Independent Director X  X  XX
 Ditlef de Vibe642011 Independent DirectorX X   X 
 Kevin Mulloy602012 Independent DirectorXX    C 
 Kevin J. O’Hara582010 Independent DirectorX XC X
 Keith Olsen622010 Independent DirectorX CX X
 Gail P. Smith592018 Independent DirectorXX  X  
 Brent K. Whittington482010 Independent DirectorXC/F    X 
 2018 Meetings     484 5 
ACAudit CommitteeCChair
CCCompensation CommitteeFCFinancial ExpertChair
CGNCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee*FServed as Chair of theAudit Committee from January 7,Financial Expert
CDCCorporate Development Committee 2016 through December 31, 2016 when Mr. O’Hara  
resumed as committee chairman

ii 

ii

Attendance:Director Elections:
In 2016, each of our current directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which the member served during the year.Each director is elected annually by a plurality of votes cast.

2016


Attendance:
In 2018, each of our current directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and committees on which the member served during the year.

Director Elections:
Directors are elected annually to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders. In uncontested elections of directors, where the number of candidates does not exceed the number of open board positions, directors are elected by a majority of votes cast. In contested elections, where the number of candidates exceeds the number of open board positions, directors are elected by a plurality of votes cast.

2018 PERFORMANCE AND COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

RigNet performance. The Board of Directors believes changes made toDuring 2018, our executive leadership team continued to execute on the Company’s strategic plan to grow market share in 2016 will position the Company for continued growth inour core managed communications business focused on the oil and gas sectorindustry and accelerate our strategic expansion into adjacent remote communications markets.to introduce new products that move us “up the stack.”  The Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and other named executives respondedexecutive leadership team are responding to 2016’s continued challenging economicchanging technologies and market conditions by reallocating resourcesfocusing on customer service and restructuring personnelmarket and product diversification, while continuing to reducegenerate positive net cash provided by operating costs for long-termactivities. Further, our CEO recruited critical leadership with financial stability.

and investor relations experience to drive execution of our strategic plan in the future.


Compensation decisions reflect a balanced and responsible pay approach. The Compensation Committee has responsibility for oversight of RigNet’s executive compensation framework and, withinframework.  Within that framework, and working with senior management, aligningthe Compensation Committee works to align pay with performance and creatingto create incentives that reward responsible risk-taking while also consideringgiven RigNet’s business environment.


In order to maintain our ability to attract and retain highly skilled executives, the Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation of our executives should be competitive with the market in which we compete for talent.  The Compensation Committee targets executive basereviews and considers, among other factors, the compensation to be between the 25th percentile and the median forof our peer group.group companies, individual performance, and company performance when making compensation decisions.  Our pay-for-performance philosophy is incorporated into both our short and long-term incentive plans.  Our Short-term Incentive Plan (“STIP”), which compensates our executives with short-term incentives for meeting andand/or exceeding corporate goals tied to Consolidated Revenue and Management EBITDA, a non-GAAP metric, and individual objectives, which may be paid in either cashequity or equitycash as determined annually by our Board.  We target cashOur Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) compensates our executives through (i) performance-based equity awards utilizing a three-year performance period for meeting and short-term incentive compensationexceeding specific targets, (ii) stock options to be at the medianencourage stock appreciation, and (iii) time-vested restricted stock units for risk mitigation, retention and stability. STIP and LTIP goals and awards are established annually under our peer group for target performance and reward above target performance with above median compensation. Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Our performance during 2016 did not achieve2018 resulted in 106.8% achievement of the minimum 90% thresholdManagement EBITDA target and 101.0% of the Consolidated Revenue target, exceeding thresholds of our performance goals under the STIP, and as such noSTIP.  STIP bonuses were funded.

funded to participants through the issuance of approximately 134,000 shares of our stock and, for all other employees, cash bonuses totaling approximately $1,502,000 paid in March 2019.  A reconciliation of Management EBITDA to Net Income, its closest comparable GAAP metric, is presented in Appendix A to this proxy statement.


For 2018, our Compensation Committee set the base salary of our CEO, Mr. Pickett, joinedat $494,700 and target award opportunities for him under the Company on May 31, 2016 as our CEO. Until then, Mr. Jimmerson led the Company as interim CEO from January 7, 2016 through May 31, 2016 due to Mr. Slaughter’s employment with the Company ending effective January 7, 2016. Mr. Pickett’s2018 STIP and LTIP each at 100% of base salary, and target long-term incentive compensation percentage for 2016 were set at $485,000 and 100%, respectively,providing a 2.0% increase to his base salary based on peer compensation data obtained from our compensation consultant and negotiation results during the recruitment of our CEO and President.consultant.  Mr. Pickett also received a guaranteed 2016 cash bonus as well as reimbursement of certain relocation related costs, and will begin participating in the STIP in 2017, as agreed to in his employment agreement.

Compensation during 2016  We paid Mr. Pickett’s STIP for 2018 in shares of our interim CEO, Mr. Jimmerson and former CEO, Mr. Slaughter’s base salaries and target bonus percentages were set at $415,000 and 100%, respectively, which represents unchanged compensation levels from 2015 for the CEO and President position.common stock to further align his interests with those of our stockholders.  The Compensation Committee believes that its recommendations on our CEOs’CEO’s pay reflectreflects the required leadership skills and level of responsibility givencommensurate with our current size and market conditions.  The Compensation Committee also believes its decisions onthat our CEO’s pay to be consistent with prior years and represents a balanced and responsible pay-for-performance approach to compensation.

During 2016,


Mr. Ahlstrom’s base compensationsalary, 2018 STIP and 2019 LTIP target opportunities were set based on negotiations in connection with his recruitment during 2018 and comparable data from our peer group. Mr. Eastman joined the Company in October 2017 and Ms. McDermott, who served as our interim Chief Financial Officer, received a base salary increase in 2017.  As such their respective base salary and target bonus percentages for Messrs. Schneider, Sutton, Maytorena and Hansenaward opportunities established during 2017 remained unchanged from 2015 reflectingin 2018.  Ms. McDermott was compensated for serving as our Interim Chief Financial Officer during 2018 through a restricted stock unit award, which vests ratably over a two-year period.  For Messrs. Hilbert and Sullivan base salary was increased at 2.0% and target award opportunities under the continued industry market challenges. Total2018 STIP and LTIP remained unchanged.  The Compensation Committee believes total compensation for these named executives reflects a balanced and responsible pay-for-performance approach to compensation.

iii

Equity compensation.Through equity compensation, our executives have a significant portion of compensation “at risk” and accordingly have the potential for earning above the median of our peer group.  “At risk” means executives will not realize increased value asunless they manage and operate themeet minimum performance goals, which are tied to Company to achieve financial, operational and strategic goals, which we believe closely correlate to long-term stockholder value creation.creation, but can realize increased value if they exceed the target level of those performance goals.  RigNet grants restricted stock units (or RSUs) to named executives annually, which typically vest ratably over 4 years subject to continued employment.  RigNet also grants performance units (or PUs), which are earned following achievement of specific pre-established annual performance results and vest generally upon completion of the three-year performance period. In 2018, RigNet resumed granting stock option awards annually to named executives, which typically vest over 4 years through continued employment. RigNet also grants performance units, which vest based on specific annual performance resultswith payoutgenerallyupon completion of the three-year performance period.In 2016, the Compensation Committee also awarded stock options to named executive officers joining RigNet during the year, including our CEO, which vest over four years through continued employment and granted restricted stock units and performance units to incentivize retention of other key executive officers. Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, equity awards are reported in full for 20162018 in the respective columns in the Summary Compensation Table.

iii 


20162018 Summary Compensation

 SalaryBonusStock
Awards
Option
Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
All Other
Comp.

Total
Steven Pickett (1)  $ 285,404$ 282,917$ 253,943  $ 646,000$             —  $ 32,590 $ 1,500,854
Chief Executive Officer and President       
Charles Schneider325,000 604,176480929,656

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

       
William Sutton 262,000 — 515,760480 778,240

Senior Vice President and

General Counsel

       
       
Jay Hilbert42,308 165,07568207,451
Senior Vice President, Sales       
Edward Traupman37,008 — 88,04059 125,107
Vice President, System Integration &
Automation
       
Martin Jimmerson (2) 167,596            —600,000              —18,556  785,952
Former Interim CEO and President and
Former Chief Financial Officer
       
Mark Slaughter (2)  33,519  —  — —  1,813,692 1,847,211  

Former Chief Executive Officer

and President

       
Hector Maytorena (2) 230,539575,134545,356 1,351,029

Former Group Vice President,

Managed Services

       
       
Morten Hagland Hansen (2)123,846399,554261,297784,697
Former Senior Vice President and
Chief Technology Officer
       
       

(1)Mr. Pickett joined RigNet on May 31, 2016. The amounts represent Mr. Pickett’s compensation provided for in his employment agreement.
(2)These executives’ employment with RigNet ended during 2016. Their compensation included separation benefits provided for in their respective employee agreements.

  SalaryBonus
Stock
Awards
Option
Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
All Other
Comp.
Total
 Steven Pickett$ 492,275$           -$ 440,769$ 59,912  $ 711,548$ 261,933$ 1,966,437
 Chief Executive Officer and President       
 Lee Ahlstrom127,885 ---170,200-298,085
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       
 Brad Eastman300,000 -272,643 37,057204,72311,654826,077
 Senior Vice President and General Counsel       
 Jay Hilbert279,125-224,929 30,573109,6298,850653,106
 Senior Vice President, Sales       
 Brendan Sullivan253,750-136,321 18,528202,4959,855620,949
 Chief Technology/Information Officer       
 Tonya McDermott184,500 -223,182 15,951103,7457,157534,535
 Former Interim Chief Financial Officer; Vice President, Tax and Treasury       

For more information on total compensation as calculated under SEC rules, see the narrative and notes accompanying the 20162018 Summary Compensation Table, on page 26.

28.


2019 Changes.  The Compensation Committee evaluates each component of total compensation for our executive officers and recommends changes to the Board to realize our key compensation objectives and incentivize performance.  The Board approved the following with respect to 2019 compensation:
·Increases to base salaries averaging 3.1% for our NEOs;
·3 year vesting periods for RSUs and stock options, reflecting practice amongst our peer companies;
·New performance metrics for PUs to reflect current business environment and RigNet strategic drivers;
·New individual STIP cash flow objective for each of our NEOs;
·Reduced the maximum payout on PUs from 300% to 250%; and
·Standardized severance packages, based on position.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS

Key


Best-Practice Compensation Governance Features

Our executive compensation program is grounded in the following policies and practices, which promote sound compensation:

What We DoClawback of incentiveWhat We Don’t Do
Place a heavy emphasis on variable compensation and equity compensation,
Provide “single trigger” change in the event ofcontrol severance benefits
Require significant stock ownership
Offer perquisites, other than relocation assistance
Maintain a financial restatement
clawback policyNo
Allow excise tax gross-upsgross up upon a change in control
Conduct annual compensation risk assessments
Permit hedging or short selling of Company stock
Use an independent compensation consultant
Re-price options and other equity incentives
iv

2018 Elements
Executive share ownership requirements and restrictions, including an anti-hedging and anti-pledging policy

Elements

TypeFormTerms
EquityStock Options
•  Options generally vest 25% per year while employedsubject to continued employment
  
•   No automatic accelerated option vesting upon a change of control
    
 Restricted Stock Units
•   Unit awards generally vest 25% per year while employed
subject to continued employment
•   No automatic accelerated stockunit award vesting upon a change of control
    
 Performance Units
•   Unit awards generally vest based on achievement of performance measures over a multiple-year period
•   Awards vest at target for periods following a change in control
Cash or EquitySTIP BonusSTIP

•   Based on achievement of quantitativeobjective performance criteria and other qualitative goals

- Funding level based on revenue and Adjusted EBITDA results

- Awards based on achievement of specific goals

CashSalary
Salary
Retirement
Generally eligible for annual increase
•  Reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee
•  4% match of voluntary 401(k) contributions vest immediately

iv 

GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Board Leadership

We have an independent director who is elected by the independent directors to serve as the chairman of the Board, with broad authority and responsibility over Board governance and its operations.  As a result of 2016’s leadership changes, we named an independent director to serve as the Vice Chairman of the Board from January 7, 2016 through December 31, 2016, who actively collaborated with the interim CEO and executive team. See “Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight” on page 8 for more information.

Director Independence

All of our non-executive director nominees are independent. An independent director chairs each Board committee. We believe our Board should consist primarily of independent directors. See “Director Independence” on page 9 for more information.


Board Risk Oversight

Our Board has oversight for risk management with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic, operational, financial, legal and compliance risks.  See “Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight” on page 8 for more information.
Director Independence
With the exception of Mr. Pickett, our CEO, all of our director nominees are independent.  An independent director chairs each Board committee.  See “Director Independence

Corporate” on page 9 for more information.

Board Development

Our Board’s diversity of experience, technical and industry knowledge brings value by providing management oversight and guidance related to evaluating corporate development opportunitiesfrom a variety of perspectives.  See “Policy on Director Qualifications and managing risks from merger and acquisition initiatives. See “Corporate Development CommitteeNominations” on page 129 for more information.



v

 

 

CONTENTS

NOTICE OF THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

 Page
PROXY SUMMARYii
PROXY STATEMENT2
GOVERNANCE4
 Director Nominees4
 Corporate Governance8
 Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight8
 Director Independence9
 Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations9
 Communications to Our Board of Directors10
 Meetings of Our Board of Directors and Attendance at Annual Meetings11
 Committees of Our Board of Directors11
 Report of the Audit Committee13
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION14
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION16
 Our Executive Officers16
 Compensation Discussion and Analysis17
 Summary Compensation Table2628
 20162018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards31
 Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 2016201832
 Option Exercises and Vesting of Restricted Stock32
Pension Benefits33
 Pension BenefitsNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation33
 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation33
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control33
Compensation Committee Report34
Compensation Committee ReportSECURITY OWNERSHIP35
SECURITY OWNERSHIP36
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management3635
 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance3736
 Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans3736
 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions3736
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION3938
 Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 20182020 Annual Meeting3938
 Other Matters for the 20172019 Annual Meeting40
PROPOSALS41
PROPOSALS42
Proposal One:  Election of Directors4241
 Proposal Two:  Ratification of Independent Auditors 41
 Proposal Three:  Approve the RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan42
 Proposal Three:  Advisory Vote on Frequency of Advisory Voting on our Named Executive Officers’ Compensation43
Proposal Four:  Advisory Vote on Compensation of Named Executive Officers48
APPENDICES50
 43A - Non-GAAP Measure Reconciliation of Management EBITDA50
B – Annex A – RigNet Omnibus Plan51

Your vote is important. Please complete, sign, date and return your proxy or voting instruction form, or submit your vote and proxy on the Internet. Our Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are available at “https:https://materials.proxyvote.com/766582”766582.

1

PROXY STATEMENT 

 

 1

PROXY STATEMENT

RIGNET, INC.

15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300

Houston, Texas 77084-4947

 

We are furnishing this proxy statement to stockholders in connection with RigNet’s solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors for the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Distribution of this proxy statement and proxy card to stockholders is scheduled to begin on or about April 3, 2017.8, 2019.

 

Date, Time and Place of Meeting

 

Our Board of Directors (“the Board”) is asking for your proxy for use at the RigNet, Inc. 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) or at any adjournments or postponements thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 3, 2017,8, 2019, at 10:8:00 a.m., Central Daylight Time Houston Marriot Energy Corridor – Reata Ballroom, 16011 Katy Freeway,at RigNet’s headquarters located at 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77094.77084.

 

Proposals

 

At our 20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, we are asking our stockholders to consider and act upon proposals to: (1) elect nine directors to serve until our 20182020 Annual Meeting;Meeting or until their respective successors have been elected and qualified or until the earliest of their removal, resignation or death; (2) ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditor for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017;2019; (3) vote, asapprove the RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan; and (4) approve a non-binding advisory vote,resolution on RigNet’s executive compensation.

Who Can Attend the frequencyAnnual Meeting

Only stockholders of future advisory votesrecord as of the close of business on March 14, 2019 or the holders of their valid proxies may attend the Annual Meeting. A list of our stockholders will be available for review at our executive compensation and (4) approve,offices in Houston, Texas, during ordinary business hours for a period of 10 days prior to the meeting. Each person attending the Annual Meeting may be asked to present a photo ID, such as a non-binding advisory vote,driver’s license, before being admitted to the compensationmeeting. In addition, stockholders who hold their shares through a broker or nominee (i.e., in street name) should provide proof of our named executive officers.their beneficial ownership as of March 14, 2019, such as a brokerage statement showing their ownership of shares as of that date.

 

Record Date, Outstanding Shares and Quorum

 

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 6, 201714, 2019 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 18,029,01319,471,316 shares outstanding sharesand entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders as of the Record Date of a majority of our outstanding shares is necessary to constitute a quorum for purposes of voting on the proposals at the Annual Meeting. AbstainingAbstentions and withheld votesbroker non-votes will count as present for purposes of establishing a quorum on the proposals.

 

If by the date of the Annual Meeting we do not receive sufficient shares to constitute a quorum or to approve one or more of the proposals, the Chair of the Annual Meeting, or the persons named as proxies, may propose one or more adjournments of the Annual Meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. The persons named as proxies would typically exercise their authority to vote in favor of adjournment.

 

Broker Non-Votes

Under New York Stock Exchange Rule 452, which governs all brokers (including those holding NASDAQ-listed securities), brokers are entitled to vote shares held by them for their customers on matters deemed “routine” under applicable rules, even though the brokers have not received voting instructions from their customers.

Brokers, however, may not vote on “non-routine” matters on behalf of their clients in the absence of specific voting instructions. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a broker’s customer does not provide the broker with voting instructions on “non-routine” matters for shares owned by the customer but held in the name of the broker. In those instances, the broker cannot vote the uninstructed shares and reports the number of such shares as “non-votes.”

Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 3 (approval of RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Plan) and Proposal 4 (the non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers) are each considered “non-routine” matters. Accordingly, a broker may not vote on those proposals without instructions from its customer, and broker “non-votes” may occur with respect to those proposals. Proposal 2 (ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm) qualifies as a “routine” matter. Your broker, therefore, may vote your shares in its discretion if you do not provide instructions on how to vote on this “routine” matter.

2

Voting

 

If you are a record holder of our common stock, you are entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting for each share that you held as of the Record Date. Cumulative voting for directors is not permitted. The Inspector of Elections appointed for the Annual Meeting will tabulate all votes.

 

You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote your proxy card in advance of the Annual Meeting. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person, we will give you a ballot at the meeting. However, please note that if your shares are held in “street name” (in the name of a broker or by a bank or other nominee), you are considered the beneficial owner of these shares and proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker or nominee, which is considered, with respect to these shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote; however, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a proxy from your brokerage firm an account statement, letter or other evidence satisfactory to us of your beneficial ownershipthe record holder of the shares. Please vote your proxy by mailor return voting instructions to your broker as soon as possible so that your shares may be represented at the Annual Meeting.

 

Revoking Your ProxyVoting Standards

 

If you submit yourWith respect to Proposal 1 (election of directors), being an uncontested election, our Bylaws require that the director nominees be elected by a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting (the number of votes cast “for” a director nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee). Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted and will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. With respect to Proposal 2 (ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm) and Proposal 3 (approval of the RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan), our Bylaws require the approval of a majority of the votes cast on these proposals. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of this proposal. With respect to Proposal 4 (approving the compensation of our named executive officers), our Bylaws require approval by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy by mail, you may still revoke it at any time before voting takes place at the Annual Meeting. If you areAbstentions and broker non-votes will have the record holdereffect of your shares and wish to revoke your proxy, you may revoke it as follows: (i) by delivering, before or at the

 2

Annual Meeting, a new proxy with a later date; (ii) by delivering, on or before the business day prior to the Annual Meeting, a notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at the address set forth in the notice of the Annual Meeting; (iii) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting, although your attendance at the Annual Meeting, without actually voting, will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy; or (iv) if you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow the directions received from your broker to change those instructions.against this proposal.

 

If you sign and return your proxy card but do not give any voting instructions, your shares will be voted in favor of the election of each of the director nominees listed in Proposal One, in favor of Proposal Two, “One” for Proposal Three and in favor of ProposalProposals Two, Three and Four. As far asof the date of this proxy statement we know, noare unaware of any other matters willproposal or item of business to be presented at the Annual Meeting. However, if any other matters of business are properly presented, the proxy holders named on the proxy card are authorized to vote the shares represented by proxies according to their judgment.

 

Revoking Your Proxy

If you submit your proxy by mail or Internet, you may still revoke it at any time before voting takes place at the Annual Meeting. A stockholder of record may revoke a proxy prior to the completion of voting at the Annual Meeting by giving written notice to our Secretary at 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77084, delivering a later-dated proxy in the manner provided on the proxy card (via the Internet or by written proxy card), or voting in person at the Annual Meeting.  Please note, however, that only your last-dated proxy will count—any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting as described in this proxy statement. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting, without actually voting, will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy. If you have instructed a broker to vote your shares, you must follow the directions received from your broker to change those instructions.

Soliciting Proxies

 

RigNet will pay all expenses of soliciting proxies to be voted at the Annual Meeting. After the proxies are initially distributed, RigNet and its officers, directors and employees (who will not receive any additional compensation for any solicitation of proxies) may also solicit proxies by mail, electronic mail, telephone or in person. We will ask brokers, custodians, nominees and other record holders to forward copies of the proxy materials to beneficial owners for whom they hold shares.

 

Annual Report on Form 10-K and Additional Materials

 

The Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 have been made available to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. These materials may also be viewed at “https:https://materials.proxyvote.com/766582”.766582.

 

Unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “RigNet,” the “Company,” “our,” “we,” “us” and similar terms refer to RigNet, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

 3
3

GOVERNANCE

 

Our Board currently consists of nine directors, each of whom has a term that expires at the Annual Meeting. Each of our current Board members has been nominated to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Each director elected at the Annual Meeting to our Board will serve in such capacity until his or her term expires at our next Annual Meeting or his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified, subject to the earliest of their earlier death, resignation or removal. All non-employee directors meet the independence requirements under the listing standards of the NASDAQ.NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”). Steven Pickett our CEO who joined our Board on June 2, 2016 is not considered independent by virtue of his role as CEO and President of ourthe Company. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will consider and act upon a proposal to elect nine directors to our Board to serve until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Each of the director nominees has consented to serve as a director of the Company if so elected. The persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card, who have been designated by our Board, intend to voteFOR the election of the director nominees unless otherwise instructed by a stockholder in a proxy card. Each director nominee has submitted a resignation that is effective if that nominee does not receive a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting and if, the Board of Directors accepts the resignation. The Board of Directors must publicly disclose its decision regarding the tendered resignation within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results. If these nominees become unable for any reason to stand for election as a director, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card will vote for the election of such other person or persons as our Board may recommend and propose to replace such nominee or nominees.

 

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

Information concerning the nine director nominees is set forth below.

 

Name Age Position with Our Company Director Since
Steven E. Pickett 53 Chief Executive Officer and President 2016
James H. Browning 67 Chairman, Independent Director 2010
Mattia Caprioli 43 Independent Director 2013
Charles L. Davis 51 Independent Director 2005
Ditlef de Vibe 62 Independent Director 2011
Kevin Mulloy 58 Independent Director 2012
Kevin J. O’Hara 56 Independent Director 2010
Keith Olsen 60 Independent Director 2010
Brent K. Whittington 46 Independent Director 2010

Name Age Position with Our Company Director Since
Steven E. Pickett 55 Chief Executive Officer and President 2016
James H. Browning 69 Chairman, Independent Director 2010
Mattia Caprioli 45 Independent Director 2013
Ditlef de Vibe 64 Independent Director 2011
Kevin Mulloy 60 Independent Director 2012
Kevin J. O’Hara 58 Independent Director 2010
Keith Olsen 62 Independent Director 2010
Gail P. Smith 59 Independent Director 2018
Brent K. Whittington 48 Independent Director 2010

 

(GRAPHIC) 

Steven E. Pickett

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
  ●

Industry Knowledge and Experience

-

Current Chief Executive Officer and President of RigNet

-

Former CEO of 21stCentury Towers, WestTowerWesTower Communications and Telmar Network Technology

 
  ●Leadership and Global Experience – CEO and president positions for over eight years


Mr. Pickett has served as the CEO and President since joining ourthe Company onin May 31, 2016 and on our Boardas a director since June 2, 2016. Before joining RigNet, from March 2015 through May 2016, Mr. Pickett was the CEO and President of 21st Century Towers, a new entrant in the wireless infrastructure market. From December 2013 through February 2015, Mr. Pickett served as the CEO of WesTower Communications, Inc., North America’s second largest tower construction and maintenance company until its acquisition by MasTec.MasTec, Inc. Prior to WesTower, he was the CEO and President of Telmar Network Technology, Inc. from July 2008 until December 2013. Mr. Pickett’s other prior leadership roles include Senior Vice President/General Manager of Alcatel-Lucent’s Optical Network Division and Vice President of Sales at Alcatel. Mr. Pickett earned a Bachelor of Science in electrical engineering from Tufts University and a Master of Business Administration degree from The Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. He also currently serves on the board of QuEST Forum, a global association in the information and communication technologies industry. Mr. Pickett brings a wealth of experience in the communications industry to our Board and Company as well as experience running a growing company.

4

 


(GRAPHIC)

James H. Browning

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
  ●Finance ExperienceRetired KPMG LLP partner, served as KPMG’s Southwest Area Professional Practice Partner and SEC Reviewing Partner
 
  ●Leadership and Board ExperienceService on public company boards of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and Herc Holdings, Inc. and previously Endeavor International Corp.


Mr. Browning has served on our Board since December 2010, and he has served as the Chairman of our Board since May 16, 2012 and Co-Chairman of our Board from March 7, 2012 to May 16, 2012. Mr. Browning previously served as a partner at KPMG LLP, an international accounting firm, from July 1980 until his retirement in September 2009. During Mr. Browning began hisBrowning’s thirty-eight year career at KPMG LLP in 1971, becoming a partner in 1980. Mr. Browning most recently servedhis leadership roles included serving as KPMG’s Southwest Area Professional Practice Partner, in Houston. Mr. Browning has also served as an SEC Reviewing Partner and as Partner in Charge of KPMG LLP’s New Orleans audit practice. Mr. Browning received a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Louisiana State University and is a retired Certified Public Accountant. He currently serves on the boards of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc., a publicly traded financial holding company and Herc Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded full service equipment rental company. He previously served on the board of Endeavour International Corporation, a publicly traded international oil and gas exploration and production company. Mr. Browning brings a wealth of knowledge dealing with financial and accounting matters to our Board as well as extensive knowledge of the role of public company boards of directors.

 

 (GRAPHIC)


Mattia Caprioli

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
  ●

Global Experience

-

Leads KKR’s Business Services industry team in Europe

-

Mergers, acquisitions and financing experience with Goldman Sachs in London

 
  
Leadership and Board Experience – Serves on the Board of PortAventura and SBB Telemach


Mattia Caprioli has served on our Board since October 2013. Mr. Caprioli is a member of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”) responsible for its Business Services industry team in Europe. Mr. Caprioli has held leadership roles in many KKR investments including Legrand, Toys ‘R’ Us, Alliance Boots, Inaer and Bond (now Avincis) since 2001. He also currently serves on the Boards of PortAventura and SBB SBB/Telemach Group and previously served on the Board of Legrand. Prior to joining KKR, Mr. Caprioli was with Goldman Sachs International in London, where he was involved in a broad array of mergers, acquisitions and financings across a variety of industries. He holds a Master of Science degree from L. Bocconi University, Milan, Italy. Mr. Caprioli brings a diverse international background with extensive business services expertise to the Board.

 

(GRAPHIC) 

Charles L. DavisDitlef de Vibe

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
 ●Industry Knowledge and ExperiencePartner in Houston Ventures, an investment firm funding companies that apply technology solutions in the energy industry
 ●Finance Experience– Experience infinance, accounting and investment banking


Charles L. Davis has served as a member of our Board of Directors since June 2005. Mr. Davis has been a partner in Houston Ventures, formerly known as SMH Private Equity Group, a United States-based investment firm that funds companies that apply technology solutions in the energy sector, since December 2004. Mr. Davis received a Bachelor’s degree in Business from Washington and Lee University and is a Certified Public Accountant in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Mr. Davis brings experience in finance, accounting and investment banking to our Board as well as a wealth of experience in the energy industry.


(GRAPHIC) 

Ditlef de Vibe

  DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
Leadership and Global Experience – Former Managing Partner ofKistefos Venture Capital, a venture capital firm investing in the IT and telecommunications industries 

Technology Knowledge and Experience

- Former CEO ofGlobal IP Solutions

- Various Director roles with IBM

 


Ditlef de Vibe has served on our Board since May 2011. From 2001 to 2011, Mr. de Vibe served as managing partner of Kistefos Venture Capital, a venture capital firm that primarily invests in the IT and telecommunications industries. Since leaving Kistefos Venture Capital, Mr. de Vibe’s principal occupation is as an independent investor and board member for several private Norwegian companies. From 2007 to 2008, Mr. de Vibe also served as Chief Executive Officer of Global IP Solutions (GIPS) Holdings AB, a company that was publicly traded in Norway until its sale to Google, Inc. From 1996Prior to 2001,that, Mr. de Vibe served in various capacities with IBM, including IBM’s Director of Network Outsourcing EMEA, from 1999 to 2001, Director of Network Service Sales EMEA, from 1998 to 1999, and Director of Network Outsourcing Services EMEA from 1996 to 1998.EMEA. He holds a Master of Science degree from the University of Oslo. Mr. de Vibe brings a wealth of experience in IT and telecommunications along with extensive operational and commercial competencies.

5

 

(GRAPHIC) 

Kevin Mulloy

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Leadership and Global Experience

- Partner with a consulting firm that advises on business growth and revenue issues

- FormerPresident of Presidio Managed Networks

  -   FormerPresident of & Intelsat Global Service Corporation

 
Technology ExperienceServed as Executive Vice President of Corporate Development at an advanced information technology professional and managed service company
 


Kevin Mulloy has served on our Board since March 2012. Mr. Mulloy joined Blue Ridge Partners,a consulting firm servingadvising private equity clients and general businesses on growth and revenue issues,in February 2017 as a consulting partner. Mr. Mulloy haspreviously served as Executive Vice President of Corporate Development at Presidio, Inc., an advanced information technology professional and managed services company, from July 2011 to May 2013. Prior to that, Mr. Mulloy served as President of Presidio Managed Networks, the managed services business at Presidio, from June 2008 to July 2011, and from September 2007 to June 2008 he served as the Executive Vice President of Operational Strategy for Presidio. For the five years priorPrior to joining Presidio, Mr. Mulloy held leadership roles with Intelsat S.A., a provider of satellite services worldwide, including President of Intelsat Global Service Corporation from January 2003 to February 2006 and Senior Vice President of Strategy, Business Development and M&A from January 2001 to January 2003.&A. Mr. Mulloy’s experience also includes ten years with McKinsey & Company, a management consulting firm; three years with Gould Inc., an aerospace and defense company; and more than five years in the United States Navy, serving in the Surface Nuclear Propulsion branch of the Navy. Mr. Mulloy has a BSME from the US Naval Academy and an MBA from Wharton, University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Mulloy brings extensive operational satellite, telecommunications and information technology infrastructure experience to the Board.

 

(GRAPHIC) 

Kevin J. O’Hara

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Industry Knowledge and Technology Experience

- FormerPresident, CEO and& Director of Integra, a communications provider

- Co-founder of Level 3 Communications, Inc., a provider of IP-based communications

Leadership and Board Experience

-    Former CEO andExecutive Chairman of the Board of Integraa technology engineering and construction services company

-    CEO and president positions for over 20 years

 


Kevin J. O’Hara has served on our Board since December 2010 and2010. In 2016, Mr. O’Hara served as our Vice Chairman of the Board, from January 7, 2016 through December 31, 2016.primarily to assist with our CEO transition. Mr. O’Hara most recentlyjoined Congruex, LLC, a provider of technology engineering and underground construction services, as the Executive Chairman in November 2017. Prior to that he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Integra Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc., a communications provider. He served on itsIntegra’s Board sincebeginning in December 2009, was appointed Chairman of the Board in March 2011 and was named CEO in December 2011. Mr. O’Hara left Integra in September 2014. Prior to joining Integra, he was a co-founder and Chairman of the Board of Troppus Software Corporation, an early stage software company providing technical solutions to service providers that support home technology and networks, from March 2009 until a major service provider acquired it in January 2011. Mr. O’Hara also served on the Board of Directors of Elemental Technologies, Inc., a leading provider of video processing solutions for broadcast and on-line video customers from January 2011 until October 2016, serving as Chairman from August 2011 until October 2016. Prior to that, Mr. O’Hara was a co-founder of Level 3 Communications, Inc., a provider of IP-based communications services to enterprise, content, government and wholesale customers, and served as itsin various leadership roles including President, from July 2000 to March 2008 and as the Chief Operating Officer of Level 3 Communications, Inc. from March 1998 to March 2008. From August 1997 to July 2000, Mr. O’Hara served asand Executive Vice President of Level 3 Communications, Inc.President. Prior to that, Mr. O’Hara served as President and Chief Executive Officer of MFS Global Network Services, Inc. from 1995 to 1997, and as, Senior Vice President of MFS, and President of MFS Development, Inc. from October 1992 to August 1995. From 1990 to 1992, he was a, and Vice President of MFS Telecom, Inc. Mr. O’Hara has a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago and a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering from Drexel University. Mr. O’Hara brings a wealth of experience in the communications industry to our Board as well as experience running a public company.

6

 

(GRAPHIC) 

Keith Olsen

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
  ●

Industry Knowledge and Technology Experience

-     CEO and Director of a data center services company

-     Former CEO, President and Director of aprovider of network-neutral data center

 
 

Leadership and Global Experience

-     International business development with international carriers and service providers

-     Former Public Company CEO

 


Mr. Olsen has served on our Board since December 2010 when we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”).2010. Since June 2013, Mr. Olsen currently serveshas served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of vXchnge Holdings LLC, a private company offering data center services. Mr. Olsen previously served as Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Switch and Data Facilities Company, Inc., a NASDAQ listed company, which provided network-neutral data centers that house, power and interconnect the Internet, from February 2004 to May 2010, when Switch and Data Facilities Company, Inc. was acquired by Equinix, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Olsen served as a Vice President of AT&T, where he was responsible for indirect sales and global sales channel management from May 1993 to February 2004. From 1986 to 1993, Mr. Olsen servedand as Vice President of Graphnet, Inc., a provider of integrated data messaging technology and services. Mr. Olsen has a Bachelor’sBachelor degree from the State University of New York, Geneseo. Mr. Olsen brings experience in running a public company to our Board as well as a wealth of experience in the communications industry.

 

(GRAPHIC) 

Brent K. WhittingtonGail P. Smith

 

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS
 ●

Industry and Technology Experience

-     Founder and Director of a mobility and cloud research and consulting firm

-     Expertise in cyber security and the General Data Protection Regulation

Leadership and Global Experience

-     Former Corporate Group Vice President of a communications company

-     Managed multinational operations in telecommunications and internet services


Gail P. Smith joined our Board on January 17, 2018. Ms. Smith founded the Cavell Group, a convergence, mobility and cloud research and consulting firm, in 2002 and continues to serve as a director. Prior to that, Ms. Smith served as Corporate Group Vice President and President, Europe of Level 3 Communications, Inc. and held product marketing and strategy roles at MFS International. Ms. Smith has worked and managed operations in both the U.S. and Europe. She holds a Master degree in International Business from Tufts University and a Bachelor degree in Economics and Political Science from Claremont McKenna College. Ms. Smith brings extensive technical, operational and strategic leadership experience to the Board.

Brent K. Whittington

DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Finance Experience

- FormerCFO of Windstream Corporation and its predecessor, Alltel Holding CorpCorp.

- Arthur Andersen LLP experience for over eight years

 
 
Leadership and Industry Experience – Former COO of acommunications company providing phone, high-speed Internet and high-definition digital TV services
 


Mr. Whittington has served on our Board since December 2010 when we completed our IPO.2010. Mr. Whittington haspreviously served as the Chief Operating Officer of Windstream Corporation, a publicly traded communications company providing phone, high-speed Internet and high-definition digital TV services, from August 2009 to September 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Whittington served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Windstream Corporation from July 2006 to August 2009. From December 2005 to July 2006, Mr. Whittington servedWhittington’s prior experience also includes serving as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Windstream Corporation’s predecessor, Alltel Holding Corp. From 2002 to August 2005, Mr. Whittington served as, Vice


President of Finance and Accounting of Alltel Corporation, parent company of Alltel Holding Corp and from August 2005 to December 2005, Mr. Whittington also served as the Senior Vice President-Operations Support of Alltel Corporation. Prior to joining Alltel, Mr. Whittington was with Arthur Andersen LLP for over eight years. Mr. Whittington has a degree in accounting from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Mr. Whittington brings experience in finance and accounting to our Board as well as a wealth of experience in the communications industry.

7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The Board and the Company annually review RigNet’s governance documents, which are available on our website. These governance materials include, but are not limited to, our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations, Policy Governing Related Person Transactions and Board committee charters. The Board regularly reviews corporate governance developments and, when appropriate, modifies its governance policies, committee charters and key practices.

 

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct

 

We have a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers and all persons performing similar functions. A copy of that code is available on our corporate website at the following link

http://investor.rig.net/corporate-governance.cfm”.code-ethics-and-business-conduct-2.

 

Composition of the Board of Directors

 

Our Board currently consists of nine members, eight of whom are non-employee members. Mr. Pickett, who serves as theour CEO and President, also serves as a director.director of the Company. Each director holds office until the election and qualification of his or her successor, or his or her earlier death, resignation or removal. Our by-lawsBylaws permit our Board to establish by resolution the authorized number of directors.

 

With respect to the Annual Meeting, we have nine nominees and nine available board seats. Currently,As this election will involve an uncontested election of directors, in order to be elected to the board at the Annual Meeting, each nominee must receive a boardmajority of the votes cast. Any current director who does not receive a majority of “For” votes at the Annual Meeting must tender his or her resignation to the Board in accordance with the Board’s majority vote resignation policy, which is described in our bylaws. A Board member may be removed outside of the normal election process by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of our directors. The nine nominees receiving the most votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be elected to our Board.

 

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE AND ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT

 

Currently, we separate the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, each Board committee is presently comprised solely of independent directors. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company, with the advice of the Board, and the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while theCompany. The Chairman of the Board operates as lead independent director and provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, approves the agenda for Board meetings, and presides over meetings of the full Board. The independent members of the Board also regularly meet in executive session without management present. The Board believes this separation allows our CEO to focus on running the company and our chairman to focus on running the Board, which is appropriate at this time because of the brief tenure of most of our public status.senior management. Our Board does not have a policy on whether or not the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be separate and, if they are to be separate, whether the Chairman of the Board should be selected from the non-employee directors or be an employee or former employee. The Board believes that it should be free to make a choice from time to time in any manner that it believes is in the best interests of our Company and our stockholders at that time.

From January 7, 2016 through December 31, 2016, we also had an independent director serving as the Vice Chairman of the Board to lead our efforts in the search and selection of a new, permanent Chief Executive Officer and President and actively collaborate with the former interim CEO and executive team to support our next phase of development both in merger and acquisition activities and other initiatives to expand our products and solutions. The Board actively oversees management, particularly through regular conferences between the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman. The Board reviews the Chairman of the Board position annually after the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

Risk Oversight

 

Risk is an inherent part of RigNet’s business activities and successful management of that risk is critical to the Company’s growth and success. The Board seeks to assess major risks facing ourthe Company and options for their mitigation in order to promote our stockholders’ and other stakeholders’ long-term interests. We reward our executives for taking responsible risks in line with the Company’s strategic objectives and overall risk appetite. Depending on the nature of the risk involved and the particular business function involved, we use a wide variety of risk mitigation strategies, including delegation of authorities, standardized processes, strategic planning, operating reviews and insurance.

 8
8

The Board has oversight for risk management and actively reviews risk management practices through continuous dialogues and receipt of management reports. The Board and its committees collectively oversee risk by actively reviewing material management decisions throughout the year in the areas that risk responsibility has been delegated.

 

The Board has delegated responsibility for the oversight of specific risks to the Board committees as follows:

 

Corporate
Governance and
Nominating
Confirms the existence and capability of risk management systems and controls specific to operational, technological, compliance, reputational and political risks
Reviews assessments and implementation of risk-based controls for our business activities
Oversees risk related to the Company’s governance structure and processes including risks arising from related person transactions
 Monitors cybersecurity programs
AuditOversees policies and processes related to the financial statements, financial reporting process, compliance and auditing
Monitors ongoing compliance issues and matters and meets with our independent accounting firm
Reviews risk management practices and performance related to credit, liquidity and compliance risks
Compensation
CompensationOversees the risk management associated with management resources, structure and succession planning and supports the selection process
Evaluates the effect theand monitors our compensation structure may have on risk decisionspolicies and programs
Corporate Development
Corporate
Development
Provides guidance related to corporate development opportunities
Reviews risk mitigation strategies in connection with merger and acquisition initiatives

The extent of the Board’s oversight function has the effect of solidifying the Board’s leadership structure by providing knowledge and input into material risk decisions.

 

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Our Board has reviewed the independence of each director nominee and considered whether any directornominee had or has a material relationship with us that could compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. As a result of this review, our Board has determined that Ms. Smith and Messrs. Browning, Caprioli, Davis, de Vibe, Mulloy, O’Hara, Olsen, and Whittington qualify as “independent” in accordance with the published listing standards of the NASDAQ. Mr. Pickett is not considered independent by virtue of his role as CEO and President of ourthe Company.

 

In addition, the members of the Audit Committee of our Board each qualify as “independent” under standards established by the SEC and NASDAQ for members of audit committees, and the Audit Committee includes at least one member who is determined by our Board to meet the qualifications of an “audit committee financial expert” in accordance with SEC rules. Messrs. Browning and Whittington are independent directors who have been determined to be audit committee financial experts. Stockholders should understand that this designation is a disclosure requirement of the SEC related to Messrs. Browning and Whittington’s experience and understanding with respect to certain accounting and auditing matters. The designation does not impose on them any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than arethose generally imposed on them as members of the Audit Committee and Board, and their designation as audit committee financial experts pursuant to this SEC requirement does not affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee or Board.

 

In addition, the members of the Compensation Committee of our Board each qualify as “independent” under standards established by the SEC and NASDAQ for members of compensation committees.

 

POLICY GOVERNING DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONS AND NOMINATIONS

 

OurThe Company seeks directors who possess, at a minimum, the qualifications and skills described below and as set forth in our Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations. Nominations found on our website at http://investor.rig.net/policy-governing-director-qualifications-and-nomination.

Our Company considers diversity in its nomination of directors, and in its assessment of the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. In considering diversity, we evaluate each director candidate in the context of the overall composition and needs of our Board, with the objective of recommending a group that can best manage the business and affairs of the Company and represent stockholder interests using itstheir combined diversity of experience. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider these and other qualifications, skills and attributes when recommending candidates to our Board.

 9
9

At a minimum, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee must be satisfied that each Committee-recommended nomineeperson that it nominates meets the following minimum qualifications:

 

The candidate shall exhibit high standards of integrity, commitment and independence of thought and judgment.
The candidate shall exhibit high standards of integrity, commitment and independence of thought and judgment.

 

The candidate shall be committed to representing the long-term interests of our Company’s stockholders.
The candidate shall be committed to representing the long-term interests of the Company’s stockholders.

 

The candidate shall have sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of our Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve.
The candidate shall have sufficient time and availability to devote to the affairs of the Company, particularly in light of the number of boards on which the nominee may serve.

 

To the extent the candidate serves or has previously served on other boards, the candidate shall have a demonstrated history of contributing at board meetings.
To the extent the candidate serves or has previously served on other boards, the candidate shall have a demonstrated history of contributing at board meetings.

 

The candidate shall meet any other minimum qualifications and other criteria for Board membership approved by our Board from time to time.
The candidate shall meet any other minimum qualifications and other criteria for Board membership approved by our Board from time to time.

 

In addition to the minimum qualifications for each candidate set forth above, our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee shall recommendrecommends that our Board select persons for nomination to help ensure that:

 

A majority of the Board is “independent” in accordance with the standards, if any, promulgated by the SEC, any exchange upon which securities of our Company are traded and any governmental or regulatory body exercising authority over our Company.
A majority of the Board is “independent” in accordance with the standards, if any, promulgated by the SEC, any exchange upon which securities of the Company are traded and any governmental or regulatory body exercising authority over the Company.

 

Each of our Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees are comprised entirely of independent directors.
Each of our Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees are comprised entirely of independent directors.

 

At least one member of our Audit Committee shall have such experience, education and other qualifications necessary to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC.
At least one member of our Audit Committee shall have such experience, education and other qualifications necessary to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC.

 

In addition, forFor the overall structure and composition of our Board, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee seeks directors with the following types of experienceexperience:

 

Leadership experience.We believe that directors who have held significant leadership positions, especially CEO positions, over an extended period, provide the Company with unique insights. These peopleindividuals generally possess extraordinary leadership qualities and the ability to identify and develop those qualities in others. They demonstrate a practical understanding of organizations, processes, strategy and risk management, and know how to drive change and growth.

 

Global experience.RigNet’s continued success depends, in part, on its success in continuing to grow its businesses outside the United States. For example, in 2018, approximately 70.0% of RigNet’s revenues came from outside the United States.

Technology experience.As a technology-based communication company, we seek directors with backgrounds in technology and a deep understanding of technology risks because our success depends on the reliability of our technology, investments in new technologies and access to new ideas.

Global experience.RigNet’s continued success depends, in part, on its success in continuing to grow its businesses outside the United States. For example, in 2016, approximately 70% of RigNet’s revenues came from outside the United States.

Finance experience.We believe that an understanding of finance and financial reporting processes is important for our directors as RigNet measures its operating and strategic performance by reference to financial goals. In addition, accurate financial reporting and robust auditing are critical to RigNet’s success. We seek to have directors who qualify as audit committee financial experts, and we expect all of our directors to be financially knowledgeable. As part of this qualification, we also seek directors who have relevant risk management experience.

 

Industry experience.We seek to have directors with experience as executives, or directors or in other leadership positions in the industries in which we participate. For example, we seek directors with experience in the communications and oil and gas industries, since many of our customers operate in the oil and gas industry.technology industries.

 

Marketing experience.Board Tenure.RigNet seeks to grow organically by identifyinghave directors with a variety of tenure on the Board, providing an influx of new ideas while ensuring stable and developing new markets for its products as well as by acquisition. Therefore, marketing expertise, especially oncontinuous oversight. Our director tenure currently ranges from 1 to 9 years with an international basis, is important to us.average of 6.8 years.



COMMUNICATIONS TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Our Board has a process in place for communications with stockholders. Stockholders should initiate any communications with our Board in writing and send them to our Board, c/o William Sutton, SeniorShelly Buchman, Vice President, andRigNet Connect, Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, RigNet, Inc., 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77084-4947. All such communications will be forwarded to the appropriate directors. This centralized process will assist our Board in reviewing and responding to stockholder communications in an appropriate manner. If a stockholder wishes for a particular director or directors to receive any such

 10

communications, the stockholder must specify the name or names of any specific Board recipient or recipients in the communications. Communications to our Board must include the number of shares owned by the stockholder as well as the stockholder’s name, address, telephone number and e-mail address, if any.

10

MEETINGS OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ATTENDANCE AT ANNUAL MEETINGS

 

During 2016,2018, our Board held teneight meetings. The standing Committees of our Board held an aggregate of 1721 meetings during this period. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and Committees on which they served. Each member of our Board is expected to attend our annual meetings of stockholders. Each person who was a director at the time of our 20162018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders attended such meeting.meeting, except for Mr. Davis, who did not stand for reelection.

 

COMMITTEES OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

 

Our Board currently has standing Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating and Corporate Development Committees. Each member of the Audit, Compensation, Corporate Governance and Nominating and Corporate Development Committees is an independent director in accordance with the NASDAQ listing standards described above and applicable SEC regulations. Our Board has adopted a written charter for each of these Committees,committees, each of which sets forth each Committee’sthe applicable committee’s purposes, responsibilities and authority. These committee charters are available on our website at “http:http://investor.rig.net/corporate-governance.cfm”.corporate-governance/committees through links to each respective committee.

Audit Committee

 

Audit Committee 
ŸSelect and oversee the independent accounting firmNumber of Meetings in 2016:2018:
ŸOversee the quality and integrity of our financial reporting4
ŸReview the organization and scope of our internal audit function and our
disclosure and internal controls
Committee Members:
ŸOversee the Company’s legalReview and regulatory complianceapprove any proposed related-person transactions

 

Whittington (C, F, I)
Browning (F, I)

DavisMulloy (I)

MulloySmith (I)

ŸApprove audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors
ŸOversee investigations of any allegations of policy or compliance violations
Ÿ

Monitor financial reporting activities and the accounting standards and

principles followed

CChair of the Committee

FAudit Committee Financial Expert as defined under SEC rules

ISatisfies standards established by the SEC and NASDAQ to be designated as an independent director
PDid not serve on the committee while serving as the Board Vice Chair from January 7, 2016 through December 31, 2016
TCommittee Chair from January 7, 2016 through December 31, 2016, while Mr. O’Hara served as Vice Chair of the Board

 

The report of our Audit Committee appears under the heading “Report of the Audit Committee” below.

 

Compensation Committee

 

Compensation Committee 
ŸReview and recommend for Board approval the compensation of the CEONumber of Meetings in 2016:2018:
ŸReview and recommend for Board approval the compensation of the Board68
ŸMake recommendations to the Board with respect to our non-CEO
executive officers,
other than the CEO
Committee Members:
ŸAdminister and implement Board approved compensation plans, policies, and programs, including short and long-term incentive plans

Olsen (C, I)
Browning (F, I)

de Vibe (I)

O’Hara (P, I)(I)

ŸReview succession planning for our executive officers

 

All Compensation Committee members are also “non-employee directors” as defined by Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). The report of our Compensation Committee appears under the heading “Compensation Committee Report” below.

 11
11

Procedures and Processes for Determining Compensation - Please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis, The Compensation Committee,” below for a discussion of the Compensation Committee’s procedures and processes for making compensation determinations.

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation - No member of the Compensation Committee has any relationship with our Company requiring disclosure in any of the reports that we file with the SEC, other than service on our Board. None of our named executive officers serves as a member of the Board or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Compensation Committee.

 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee 
ŸIdentify and recommend nominees for the BoardNumber of Meetings in 2016:2018:
ŸMonitor and develop our corporate governance practices, guidelines, code of ethics and business conduct and compliance mechanisms

4

Committee Members:

O’Hara (C, I)
Caprioli (I)
Olsen (I)

Smith (I)

ŸReview risk performance and enterprise risk exposure across operational, technological, compliance, reputational and political areasCommittee Members:
Oversees the Company’s legal and regulatory compliance

O’Hara (C, I, P)

Browning (T, F, I)
Caprioli (I)
Olsen (I)

Ÿ

Monitor the existence and capability of risk management systems and control

in all critical business activities and enterprise risk categories

 

The Committee will evaluateevaluates each director nominee based upon a consideration of athe nominee’s qualification as independent as well as their diversity, skills and experience in the context of the needs of the Board as described in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may rely on various sources to identify director nominees. These include input from directors, management, professional search firms and other sources that the Committee feels are reliable.

 

Stockholders may recommend director candidates for consideration by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which will consider such suggestions made by stockholders in the same manner as other candidates. Any such suggestions should be submitted to the Chairman of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, c/o William Sutton, SeniorShelly Buchman, Vice President, andRigNet Connect, Associate General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, RigNet, Inc. 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77084-4947. The written request must include the candidate’s name, contact information, biographical information and qualifications. The request must also include the potential candidate’s written consent to being named as a nominee and to serving as a director if nominated and elected. The Committee may request additional information from time to time from the nominee or the stockholder or group of stockholders.nominating stockholder(s). Stockholder nominations that seek to bypass the consideration of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee must follow the procedures set forth in our bylaws, which are summarized below inunder the Section entitledheading “Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 20182020 Annual Meeting.”

 

Corporate Development Committee

Corporate Development Committee  
Corporate Development Committee
ŸProvide oversight and guidance for the evaluation of corporate development opportunitiesNumber of Meetings in 2016:2018:
5 
3

Ÿ

Provide oversight and guidance over the strategies and processes regarding merger and acquisition initiatives

Committee Members:

Mulloy (C, I)

Caprioli (I)

Davis (I)


de Vibe (I)


Whittington (F, I)

12


In addition to these standing committees, in 2019 our Board established a Special Litigation Committee to oversee matters related to ongoing litigation described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Mr. Whittington is the chair of the Special Litigation Committee, which also includes Messrs. Mulloy and O’Hara.

 

 12

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The Audit Committee oversees the financial reporting process of the Company on behalf of itsthe Board. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal control.

 

With respect to the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the financial statements of RigNet, Inc. and the quality of financial reporting with management, the internal auditor and the independent auditor. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees). The Audit Committee received the written disclosure and the letter from the independent auditor required under applicable rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Additionally, the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditor their independence with respect to the Company. The Audit Committee determined that the non-audit services provided to RigNet by the independent auditor (discussed below under “Proposal Two: Ratification of Independent Public Accountants”) are compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent auditor.

 

Based on the reviews and discussions described above, the Audit Committee recommended to our Board that the financial statements of RigNet, Inc. be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 for filing with the SEC.

 

 Submitted By:
  
 Audit Committee
 

Audit Committee

Brent K. Whittington, Chairman

James H. Browning

Charles L. Davis

Kevin Mulloy

Gail P. Smith

This Report of the Audit Committee is not “soliciting material” and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.

 13
13

 

DIDIRECTORRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

The following summarizes the compensation of each non-employee member of our Board for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. Since June 2, 2016, our CEO2018. Because Mr. Pickett is also a board member. Our former CEO served as a board member until his resignation on January 31, 2016. Since our CEOs were employeesan employee of the Company, they didhe does not receive additional compensation specifically related to his service on our Board.Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Caprioli does not receive any compensation from us for his role as a member of our Board due to his affiliation with KKR, a holder of over 25% of our outstanding shares of common stock.

 

Our Board has implemented a compensation policy applicable to our non-employee directors based on the anticipated service commitment and analysis of our peer companies based onusing data obtained from our compensation consultant, which provides thoseconsultant. We provide our non-employee directors the following compensation for Board and committee services:

 

a cash retainer paid quarterly for non-chairman board membership and service;

an additional cash retainer for our non-executive board chairman;

an annual equity awardsaward of restricted non-voting unitsRSUs, in an amount to be approved by the Board, which are issuable atsubject to a one share per unityear vesting requirement and settled in cash or shares of common stock upon vesting or at the option of our Company, an equivalent payment in cash;
the Company;

a cash fee for each Board meeting where overseas travel is required for attendance; and

aan additional cash retainer for committee membership or committee chairmanship based on the relative service commitment for each committee.

 

Director compensation is paid at the end of each quarter on a pro rata basis for any partial service periods. Director compensation during 2018 included quarterly cash retainers for: independent directors at $12,500; board chairman additional retainer at $14,750; meeting fees requiring overseas travel at $3,000; non-chairman committee members ranging from $1,000 to $1,500 based on the service commitment required by each committee; the Audit Committee chairman at $5,750, the Compensation Committee chairman at $4,000, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee chairman at $3,750 and the Corporate Development Committee chairman at $2,500.

 

TheAnnually, the Board determines the form and amount of director compensation after its review of recommendations made by the Compensation Committee. In January 2016, the Board elected Mr. O’Hara to serve as Vice Chairman of our Board to lead the search and selection of a new, permanent Chief Executive Officer and President. He was also tasked with taking an active role in the Board’s oversight of management’s 2016 and mid-term business plan during the transition. This role included leading Board oversight of the former interim CEO and executive team’s implementation of strategy for the next phase of development both in merger and acquisition activities and other initiatives to expand our products and solutions. Due to the significant service demand, the Board approved an increase in Mr. O’Hara’s quarterly cash board retainer to $62,500 for his service as Vice Chairman of the Board, until September 30, 2016 upon the successful CEO leadership transition to Mr. Pickett.

In June 2016, the Board approved non-executive director compensation changes effective July 1, 2016 including: the elimination of board and committee meeting fees not requiring overseas travel; an increase to the quarterly cash retainer for independent directors from $9,000 to $12,500; the reduction in meeting fees requiring overseas travel from $4,500 to $3,000; the establishment of committee member quarterly cash retainers ranging from $1,000 to $1,500 per quarter based on the service commitment required by each committee; an increase in the quarterly cash retainers for the Audit Committee chairman from $3,750 to $5,750, the Compensation Committee chairman from $2,500 to $4,000 and the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee chairman from $2,500 to $3,750. The Corporate Development Committee chairman quarterly cash retainer remained unchanged at $2,500. The Compensation Committee recommended the changes in board compensation after reviewingreviews peer company market data supplied by the Compensation Committee’sits independent consultant, data obtained through the National Association of Corporate Directors and by considering the relative service demands of each service role.role on an annual basis and, in 2018, recommended no changes in board compensation.

 

The following table summarizes the compensation of each non-employee member of our Board in 2016:2018:

 

Name (1) Earned or Paid
in Cash (2)
 Stock
Awards (3)
 Total
James H. Browning $ 133,000  $ 100,000  $ 233,000 
Mattia Caprioli (4)      
Charles L. Davis 60,000  100,000  160,000 
Ditlef de Vibe 72,500  100,000  172,500 
Kevin Mulloy 68,000  100,000  168,000 
Kevin J. O’Hara 209,000  249,995  458,995 
Keith Olsen 73,500  100,000  173,500 
Brent K. Whittington 76,000  100,000  176,000 


Name (1)

Earned or Paid

in Cash (2)

 Stock
Awards (3)
 Total
James H. Browning $ 122,680         $ 99,074          $ 221,754
Mattia Caprioli (4) -              -               -
Charles L. Davis (5) 20,167 -  20,167
Ditlef de Vibe 60,000 99,074  159,074
Kevin Mulloy 66,000 99,074  165,074
Kevin J. O’Hara71,000  99,074  170,074
Keith Olsen71,000  99,074  170,074
Gail P. Smith (6)65,500  133,084  198,584
Brent K. Whittington77,000  99,074  176,074
      
(1)EachThe non-employee directordirectors listed above served as a directordirectors for all of 2016.2018, except for Ms. Smith who was appointed in January 2018 and Mr. Davis, who did not stand for reelection at our 2018 annual meeting. Our current and former CEOs areCEO is excluded from this table, as theyhe received no compensation specifically related to theirhis service on our Board and their respectiveBoard. His compensation as an employee is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)Amounts reflect quarterly retainers and fees for Board and committee service earned by the directors during 2016.
2018.

(3)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value for restricted units granted to each independent director in 20162018 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Each independent director received an equity award in 2016 and the grant date fair value is reflected in the table above. Information about the assumptions used to value these awards can be found in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.2018. As of December 31, 2016,2018, each listed independent director, except Messrs. Caprioli and Davis and Ms. Smith, had 7,6576,627 restricted unit awards outstanding, except for Mr. O’Hara whooutstanding. Ms. Smith had 19,1428,417 restricted unit awards outstanding.
Mr. Caprioli and Mr. Davis had no outstanding awards.
14

(4)Mr. Caprioli received no compensation from RigNet for his Board service bypursuant to an agreement between the Company and KKR, our stockholder for whichstockholder. Mr. Caprioli has been a member of KKR since 2001.

 

(5)Mr. Davis did not stand for reelection at our 2018 annual board meeting, resulting in his term ending on May 2, 2018. Subsequent to serving on our Board, Mr. Davis provided the Company’s management consulting services during 2018 for fees totaling approximately $74,600.

(6)Ms. Smith joined our Board in January 2018 and was awarded a restricted unit award upon joining the Board of 1,790 units, which vested on January 17, 2019. Ms. Smith also received the same annual restricted unit award awarded all Board members on May 4, 2018 of an additional 6,627 units, which vest on May 4, 2019.

The table above reflects all compensation received by our independent directors during 2016.2018. The Company does not provide a pension plan for non-employee directors.


15

EEXECUTIVEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

OUR OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

The following table provides information regarding our current executive officers.

 

Name Age Position with Our Company
Steven Pickett 5355 Chief Executive Officer and President
Charles SchneiderLee Ahlstrom 5251 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
William SuttonBrad Eastman 6251 Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Jay Hilbert 5759 Senior Vice President, Sales
James Barnett, Jr.65Senior Vice President of Government Services
Brendan Sullivan45Chief Technology/Information Officer
Edward Traupman 6668 Vice President Systems Integration & Automationand General Manager, Products and Services
     

Steven Picketthas served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since May 31, 2016. See his biographical summary presented earlier in this proxy statement under the heading “Our Board of Directors and Nominees“Governance – Director Nominees.”

 

Charles SchneiderMr. Lee Ahlstrom has served as our Chief Financial Officer since August 20, 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ahlstrom served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since December 8, 2015. Priorof Paragon Offshore, Ltd, a spin-off from Noble Corporation, from November 2016 to that, Mr. Schneider served in various financial leadership roles at KBR, Inc. includingMarch 2018, and as Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Chief Financial Officer for the Engineering and Construction, Americas divisionPlanning from January 2015August 2014 to December 2015;October 2016. Mr. Ahlstrom served as Noble Drilling’s Senior Vice President Financeof Strategic Development from May 2011 to July 2014 and Treasurer from February 2010 to December 2014;as the Vice President Corporate DevelopmentInvestor Relations and Planning from December 2008May 2006 to February 2010; and interim Chief Financial Officer from March 2008 to June 2008. In addition, his professional career includes experience in commercial banking, project finance, corporate finance and M&A.July 2014. Mr. SchneiderAhlstrom received a B.B.A.Master and Bachelor degree in finance and a MBA from the University of Texas at Austin, McCombs SchoolDelaware. Mr. Ahlstrom serves on the Board of Business.the National Investors Relations Institute (NIRI) and holds the NIRI investor relations charter credential.

 

William SuttonBrad Eastman has served as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel since February 2014.October 30, 2017. Prior to that, Mr. SuttonEastman served as ourGeneral Counsel of the Cameron Group of Schlumberger Limited following Schlumberger’s acquisition of Cameron International in April 2016 until October 2017. Prior to the acquisition, Mr. Eastman served in various positions in the Cameron legal department, most recently as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Cameron International from June 2011 until April 2016. Mr. Eastman also held leadership positions of Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Input/Output, Inc. from May 2009 through January 20142001 until 2004 and Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of Quanta Services from March 2008 through May 2009.1998 until 2001. Mr. Sutton served as Chairman for Sweeten & Sutton Brokerage, Inc. from March 2007 to February 2008 and President and Chief Executive Officer for Abbey SA, LP from April 2004 to October 2006. He has attended Stanford Law School’s Directors’ College. Mr. SuttonEastman received a Bachelor of Business Administration degree from the University of Texas at Austin and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Houston. Harvard University.

 

Jay Hilberthas served as our Senior Vice President, Sales since joining RigNet on November 7, 2016. Prior to that, Mr. Hilbert served as Senior Vice President of Business Development and Sales - Airvana Business Unit for CommScope Holding Company, Inc., a global provider of wireless solutions from January 2015 until November 2016; Senior Vice President of Global Sales for Cambium Networks from January 2012 through December 2014; and Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Telmar Network Technology from 2007 through 2011. Mr. Hilbert also served in sales leadership positions for Spirent Communications and Somera Communications. Mr. Hilbert received a Bachelor of Science degree in Engineering Management from the University of North Dakota.

 

James Barnett, Jr. has served as our Senior Vice President, Government Services since joining RigNet on January 7, 2019. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Barnett served as the Chairman of the telecommunications group and Partner in the cybersecurity practice of Venable LLP from February 2013 to January 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Barnett was the Senior Vice President for National Security Policy at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies from May 2012 until February 2013. From July 2009 until April 2012, Mr. Barnett served as Chief of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”). Prior to joining the FCC, Mr. Barnett served as a research fellow at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies from June 2006 until June 2009. Mr. Barnett also served as a surface warfare officer in the United States Navy, most recently as Deputy Commander of the Naval Expeditionary Combat Command and retired as a Rear Admiral. Mr. Barnett holds a Bachelor degree and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Mississippi.

Brendan Sullivan has served as our Chief Technology/Information Officer since May 30, 2017.  Prior to that, Mr. Sullivan served as the Executive Vice President of Global Technology and Operations for Vubiquity from September 2013 until October 2016, the Senior Vice President of IT, Engineering and Network for Digital Generation, Inc. from May 2009 until September 2013, and the Senior Director of Content Markets Application Development for Level 3 Communications from 2000 until 2009.  Mr. Sullivan also worked at Andersen Consulting. He received a Bachelor degree from Brown University.

16

Edward Traupmanhas served as our Vice President, Products and Services since April 2018 and our Vice President, Systems Integration & Automation since joining RigNet onin November 7, 2016.2016 to April 2018.  Prior to that, he served as the Vice President and General Manager for Telmar Network Technology from January 2007 through February 2016. Mr. Traupman has also served in various management positions with companies such as Carrius Technologies, Rapid5 Networks and DSC Communications.  He received a Master of Science degree in Computer Science and a Bachelor degree in Mathematics from the Southern Methodist University.

 


COMCOMPENSATIONPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

This Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”) outlines RigNet’s executive compensation philosophy, objectives and processes and explains how the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Compensation Committee” or “Committee”) made executive compensation recommendations to the Board in fiscal year 20162018 for the named executive officers (“NEOs”) listed below:

 

NamePosition with Our Company
Steven PickettChief Executive Officer and President
Charles SchneiderLee Ahlstrom (1)Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
William SuttonBrad EastmanSenior Vice President and General Counsel
Jay HilbertSenior Vice President, Sales
Edward TraupmanBrendan SullivanVice President, Systems Integration & AutomationChief Technology/Information Officer
Martin JimmersonTonya McDermott (2)Former Interim Chief Executive Officer and President and Former
SeniorFinancial Officer; Vice President, Tax and Treasury
(1)Mr. Ahlstrom joined RigNet on August 20, 2018.

(2)Ms. McDermott served as our interim Chief Financial Officer
Mark SlaughterFormer Chief Executive Officer and President
Hector MaytorenaFormer Group Vice President, Managed Services
Morten Hagland HansenFormer Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from February 21, 2018 through August 19, 2018.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

20162018 Business Overview and Compensation Outcomes

 

The Board of Directors believe recentWith our new executive leadership changes will position theteam in place, RigNet successfully executed on its strategic plan in 2018. The Company fordemonstrated continued growth in the oilof market share and gas sectorexpansion through acquisitions and accelerateintroduction of new products to further diversify our strategic expansionbusiness into adjacent remote communications markets.communication markets and verticals. The CEO and other NEOs responded to 2016’s continued challenging2018’s economic market conditions with reduced oil and gas industry activity by reallocating resources and restructuring personnel while maintaining positive cash flow from operating activities. The CEO and other NEOs also developed and executed a plan to reduce operating costs for long-term financial stability.fund estimated litigation contingencies arising from litigation described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

On anWhen making annual basis,compensation decisions, our Compensation Committee takes into consideration the impact ofour business environment, the results of our operations and the competitive market for talent when making its decisions about compensation.talent. It also must taketakes into account the way in which the plans in our executive compensation program areis designed. It is in this context that the Compensation Committee made the following key compensation decisions for 2016:2018:

 

NoneIncreased base salaries averaging of the2.0% for our NEOs received base salary increases;employed prior to September 30, 2017;

NoneTied STIP awards to the achievement of the NEOs received bonus payments from the STIP, sinceobjective performance results were below threshold;criteria; and

All of the NEOs received their targetSplit annual long-term incentive award grant, which consists of equity in the forms ofgrants for all NEOs employed on March 15, 2018 between performance units and(50%), time-based restricted stock units.units (40%) and stock options (10%).

 

17

Specifically,In summary, 2018 base salaries, STIP bonus resultstargets and long-term incentivepayouts LTIP targets are summarizedand grant date fair values were as follows:

 

  Base Salary STIP Bonus Long-term Incentive Plan Retention 
Name 2016  2015  Target  Amount Target  Grant Date  Equity 
  Value  Awards 
Steve Pickett (1) $  485,000   n/a   100.0%  $   100.0%  $899,943  $ 
Charles Schneider  325,000  $  325,000   70.0%      140.0%   456,816   147,360 
William Sutton  262,000   262,000   65.0%      140.0%   368,400   147,360 
Jay Hilbert (2)  275,000    n/a   40.0%      90.0%   165,075    
Edward Traupman (2)  240,000    n/a   40.0%      70.0%   88,040    
Martin Jimmerson (3)  415,000   288,600   n/a      n/a   600,000    
Mark Slaughter (3)  415,000   415,000   n/a      n/a       
Hector Maytorena (3)  270,000   270,000   70.0%      140.0%   402,784   196,480 
Morten Hagland Hansen (3)  230,000   230,000   60.0%      120.0%   276,754   122,800 

  Base Salary  2018 STIP 2018 LTIP
Name20182017 Target Computed Amount  TargetGrant Date Value
Steven Pickett $ 494,700 $ 485,000100.0%$ 711,548100.0% $ 500,681 
Lee Ahlstrom (1)350,000-85.0%170,200100.0%- 
Brad Eastman (2)300,000300,00050.0% 204,723
100.0%309,700 
Jay Hilbert  280,500  275,00040.0%       109,62990.0%  255,502 
Brendan Sullivan255,000250,00060.0%202,49540.0%154.849 
Tonya McDermott (3) 184,500 184,500   40.0%       103,74570.0%239,133 
          
(1)Mr. PickettAhlstrom joined RigNet on May 31, 2016. The amounts represent Mr. Pickett’s compensation provided for inAugust 20, 2018. STIP awards were computed on base salary earned during his 2018 employment agreement; however, his participation in the STIP begins in 2017.period.

(2)Messrs. Hilbert and TraupmanMr. Eastman joined RigNet on November 7, 2016; neither are eligible to participateOctober 30, 2017 and received no base compensation adjustment in the 2016 STIP since they joined RigNet after September 30, 2016. The amounts represent his respective compensation provided for in his employment agreement.2018.

(3)These executives’ employment with RigNet ended during 2016. Mr. Jimmerson’s employment terminated on December 31, 2015 until he was rehiredMs. McDermott served as our interim CEOChief Financial Officer from January 7February 21, 2018 through June 1, 2016.August 19, 2018. To compensate Ms. McDermott for her increased responsibility the Board approved, in addition to STIP and LTIP presented above, an award of 6,693 restricted stock units that vest in two equal installments on the grant anniversary.


 

Influence of Say on Pay Results on Executive Compensation Decisions

 

We and our Compensation Committee are attentive to the outcome of the stockholder “Say on Pay” vote. At the Company’s 20162018 annual stockholder meeting, 99.2%over 92% of the total votes cast supported the executive compensation program. The Committee considered this a strong endorsement of its decisions and policies, as well as the overall design of RigNet’s current executive compensation program.  As such, while the Committee did not make any substantive changes to its executive compensation philosophy or the target percentages for cash and incentive compensation, we implemented arefined our long-term equity program to further align executive interests with our stockholders’ interests to grow long-term value, see “Long-Term Incentive Compensation” below.

 

Best-Practice Compensation Governance Features

Our executive compensation program is grounded in the following policies and practices, which promote sound compensation: 

What We Do What We Don’t Do
Place a heavy emphasis on variable compensation

x

Provide “single trigger” change in control severance benefits
Require significant stock ownershipx

Offer significant perquisites
Enforce a clawback policyx

Allow excise tax gross up upon a change in control
Conduct annual compensation risk assessmentsx

Permit hedging or short selling of Company stock
Use an independent compensation consultantx

Enable CEO to provide input regarding his compensation

WHAT GUIDES OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

Our Decision MakingDecision-Making Process

 

The “Compensation Committee”Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Committee works closely with its independent compensation consultant and executive management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. Details of the Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in the Committee’s charter, which may be accessed aton our website, “http:http://investor.rig.net/corporate-governance.cfm”committee-details/compensation-committee.

 

The Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its duties relating to compensation matters. The fundamental responsibilities of the Committee are to:

 

develop RigNet’s compensation objectives and philosophy;
review and oversee the incentive compensation and equity plans;
review performance goals, objectives and policies relevant to CEO executive compensation;
review performance goals, objectives and policies relevant tomake recommendations for Board compensation;approval of non-CEO executive officer compensation levels;
evaluate executive performance in light of thoseestablished goals to recommend executive compensation levels;
review and make recommendations for Board compensation levels;
review and recommend compensation levels and awards under incentive compensation plans that are consistent with our compensation philosophy based on Company performance and the performance of our Company, its senior management, employees and the Board;individual contribution;
administer the stock ownership policy;
review and approve disclosures relating to compensation; and
oversee succession planning for the CEO and our NEOs.

 

The Compensation Committee may form and delegate its authority to one or more subcommittees as it deems necessary or advisable from time to time, provided, that any such subcommittee must report any actions taken by it to the full Compensation Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

 

The Board approves all compensation plans and compensation arrangements for our NEOs based upon Compensation Committee recommendations.

18

The Compensation Setting Process

 

Our Compensation Committee holds regularly scheduled meetings, which coincide with our Board meetings. It also holds additional meetings as required to carry out its duties. The Committee Chairman works with our management to establish each meeting agenda.

 


At its meetings, the Committee:

 

updates the Company’s compensation strategy and objectives;
considers changes in compensation elements for the upcoming year;
reviews and considers the composition of our peer companies and peer compensation study data;
reviews actual results compared to the pre-established performance metrics for the current year to determine annual STIP incentive awards for our NEOs and total awards authorized;
reviews equity awards, either in the form of restricted stock grants or stock option awards or both;awards;
reviews Company performance metrics under our incentive compensation plans for the upcoming year;
reviews Board performance and evaluates the compensation paid to our independent directors and makes recommendations for adjustments, if any, to the Board; and
reviews the performance of our CEO.

 

Role of Compensation Consultant

 

The Committee has the sole and direct authority to retain and terminate compensation advisors and to approve their fees. All such advisors report directly to the Compensation Committee. Pearl Meyer & Partners (“Pearl Meyer”) serves as the Committee’s independent compensation consultant to assist the Committee in assessing and determining competitive compensation packages for our NEOs and directors.

 

In this capacity, Pearl Meyer has assembled information regarding:

 

identification of an updated peer group of companies;
compensation trends in the telecommunication and oil and gas service industries;
use and structure of performance-based equity awards;
relative compensation for similarly-situated NEOs within peer group companies or other companies with revenues, transactions or growth trends comparable to ourthe Company; and
relative compensation for similarly situated independent board directors of the peer group companies or other companies with revenues, transactions or growth trends comparable to our Company.

 

While the Committee relies on data provided by our independent compensation consultant or obtained through a subscription with Equilar, Inc., a provider of executive compensation information based on publicly available information contained in SEC filings, it also considers a number ofseveral other factors including:

 

performance of the executive;
historical compensation levels;
specific role the executive plays within our Company; and
changes in scope, roles and responsibilities.

 

The Role of the Peer Group, Benchmarking Data and Competitive Positioning

 

The Committee compares our executive compensation program to a group of companies that are comparable in terms of size and competitive industry including companies that are structured similarly and serve our same industry client base. The overall purpose of this peer group is to provide a market frame of reference for evaluating our compensation arrangements (current or proposed), understanding compensation trends among comparable companies, and reviewing other compensation and governance-related topics that may arise during the course of the year. The Committee reviews this data to help ensure we are providing competitive performance-based compensation.

 

With the assistance of our independent compensation consultant, we refined our compensationPearl Meyer during 2017, the Committee developed a new peer group during 2016 and 2015 to reflectfor purposes of setting compensation levels for 2018, reflecting changes in our global company,strategy, the industry, and our size as a public company to include the seventeencompany. The peer companies listed in the table below. Webelow were selected these companies because they were publicare companies of similar in financial and human capital size and scope, and they serve the geographies and customer bases in which we operate and competecompete. The Company did not pay Pearl Meyer for senior management personnel.any other services consistent with the Compensation Committee’s policy that the compensation consultant should not perform any services for us other than services as a consultant to the Compensation Committee.

19

Peer Companies

 

Aligned to the services we provideAligned to our customer base
CalixAerohive Networks, Inc.Dawson Geophysical CompanyBristow Group, Inc.
Cogent Communications GroupHoldings, Inc.Forbes Energy ServicesFlotek Industries, Inc..
8X8 Inc.Forum Energy Technologies, Inc.
Five9, Inc.ION Geophysical Corporation
Iridum CommunicationsHelix Energy Solutions Group
inContactKratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.Hornbeck Offshore Services
Iridum CommunicationsGulf Island FabricationParker Drilling Company, Inc.
KvH Industries,GulfMark Offshore Inc.
ORBCOMMRex Energy Corporation
Shoretel Inc.Tesco Corporation
TETRA Technologies Inc.
Q2 Holdings, Inc.Unit Corporation
Sonus Networks, Inc.
SPS Commerce, Inc. 


Pearl Meyer provided specific input on peer group cash and equity compensation levels and ranges. This data was used to establish 2016 compensation for the NEOs. 

 

When setting target direct compensation (base salary and target short and long-term incentive opportunities), the Committee aims to approximateconsiders the median of compensation paid to similarly situated executives of the companies comprising our peer group, as well as survey sources in Pearl Meyer’s database. Specifically, base salaries are generally established between the 25th percentile and the median for our peer group, adjusted for each individual’s education, experience, performance and potential.database, without benchmarking against a specific percentile. In addition, our NEOs can earn short-term or annual incentive bonus compensation based upon pre-established earnings and growth criteria, which are aligned withindicative of our pay-for performancepay-for-performance philosophy. Through the short-term incentive program,STIP, as well as our long-term equity compensation program,incentive plan, our NEOs have a significant portion of compensation “at risk” and accordingly have the potential for earning above the median of our peer group. “At risk” means, for the performance-based compensation programs, NEOs will not realize value unless they meet minimum performance goals, the majority of which are tied to Company financial, operational and strategic goals, which we believe closely correlate to long-term stockholder value creation.creation, but can realize increased value if they exceed the target level of those performance goals.

 

Role of Chief Executive Officer in Executive Compensation Decisions

 

Our Compensation Committee seeks input from the CEO when discussing the performance and compensation levels of our NEOs other than himself. Our CEO works with other senior executives to recommend changes to our compensation programs, prepare peer analyses, and suggest performance targets under those programs for our employees, including our NEOs, to assist the Compensation Committee in making and implementing its compensation decisions.  During 2016,2018, our former interim CEO provided recommendations to the Compensation Committee in connection with key employee retention and our incentive compensation programs based on key historical and planned Company performance. The Compensation Committee reviewed management’s recommendations and considered peer data, as well as the Company’s operating plan and budget, to recommend the specific performance goals and measures established within our 20162018 incentive compensation programs and awards, which were approved by the Board. 

 

Our Executive Compensation Program

 

Our Compensation Philosophy

 

Our executive compensation program is designed to encourage our NEOs to focus on building long-term stockholder value, maximizing growth consistent with our strategic plan and delivering strong financial results. Our compensation philosophy is grounded in the following guiding principles:

 

Pay for PerformanceA significant portion of a NEO’s total compensation should be variable (“at risk”) and dependent upon the attainment of certain specific and measurable annual- and long-term business performance objectives.
Shareholder AlignmentNEOs should be compensated through pay elements (base salaries, annual and long-term incentives) designed to create long-term value for our stockholders, as well as foster a culture of ownership.
CompetitivenessTarget compensation should be set at the median of market to ensure that compensation is at a level that is competitive with that being offered to individuals holding comparable positions at other companies with which we compete for business and leadership talent.
Attraction and RetentionThe executive compensation program should enable the Company to attract and retain highly talented people with exceptional leadership capabilities and retain high-caliber talent.
capabilities.
20

Elements of Compensation

 

Our compensation philosophy is supported by the following principal pay elements:

 

Base Salary

Cash

(Fixed)

Allows us to attract and retain qualified candidates in a highly competitive market
(Fixed)
Short-Term
Incentive Plan
(“STIP”)

Cash or Equity

(Variable)

Provides additional compensation designed to support our pay-for-performance philosophy based on achievement of annual financial results and specific individual personal goals
Long-Term
Incentives

Equity

(Variable)

Rewards executives for equity value growthPerformance and time-based awards link compensation to achievement of multi-year financial goals, incentivize retention and align executive interests with our stockholders’ interests to grow long-term value and incentivize retention

 


The charts below show the target total direct compensation (“TDC”) of our CEO and our other NEOs combined for fiscal 2016.2018. These charts illustrate that a majority of NEO TDC is variable, 61.3%66.9% for our CEO and an average of 73.1%56.8% for our other NEOs.

 

(GRAPHIC) 

 

Determining the Amount of Each Element of Compensation for 20162018

 

Base Salary

 

On March 10, 2016 after considering relevant materials provided by our compensation consultant during 2015, current economic market conditions, and the published survey for average annual market increases, our Compensation Committee recommended, and our Board approved, no changes to base compensation levels or short-term and long-term incentive compensation targets effective April 1, 2016 for Messrs. Schneider, Sutton, Slaughter, Maytorena, and Hansen. Mr. Pickett’s base compensation was set at $485,000 in connection with his recruitment as our CEO and President. Mr. Jimmerson’s base compensation, upon his hiring as our interim CEO and President, was set at $415,000, which is the same base compensation amount as our former CEO. The Compensation Committee believes that the 2016 base compensation levels achieved our target of the 25th percentile of our peer group while recognizing each officer’s level of responsibility, current workload and past experience performing their duties.

For Mr. Pickett, who joined RigNet during the year as our CEO and President, we evaluated his base compensation compared to other officer level personnel, considering his prior experience, and our compensation consultant’s materials obtained during 2015. We approved his starting base compensation of $485,000 along with a 2017 STIP target of 100.0% and 2016 long-term incentive target of 100.0% to incentivize achievement of both financial and individual goals. Similarly, for Mr. Hilbert and Mr. Traupman, who joined RigNet during the year, we evaluated each officer’s base compensation compared to other officer level personnel, considering their prior experience, and our compensation consultant’s materials obtained during 2015.

Our Compensation Committee reviews our executives’ base salaries on an annual basis taking into consideration any changes in position or responsibilities. We utilize base salary as the primary means of compensation for performing the essential elements of an executive’s job. Base salaries are set at levels between the 25th percentile andapproximate the median for our peer group, adjusted for each individual’s role, experience, proven skill sets, performance and potential, which allowenabling us to attract and retain executives in competitive markets. For 2016, our Compensation Committee approved the following base salaries:

 

  Base Salary  
Name 2016  2015  % Change 
Steven Pickett (1) $  485,000  n/a   
Charles Schneider 325,000  $  325,000   
William Sutton 265,000  265,000   
Jay Hilbert (2) 275,000   n/a   
Ed Traupman (2) 240,000  n/a   
Martin Jimmerson (2) 415,000  288,600  n/a 
Mark Slaughter 415,000  415,000   
Hector Maytorena 270,000  270,000   
Morten Hagland Hansen 230,000  230,000   

Mr. Pickett’s base compensation was increased by 2.0% to $494,700 over his 2017 base compensation. We evaluated his base compensation compared to other officer level personnel, considering his prior experience, and our compensation consultant’s materials obtained during 2018. The increase recognized his service since joining the Company and provided a cost of living adjustment. Messrs. Ahlstrom and Eastman’s base compensation was set pursuant to negotiations during recruitment resulting in their employment during 2018 and 2017, respectively. Similar to Mr. Pickett, Messrs. Hilbert and Sullivan’s base compensation was increased 2.0% during 2018. Ms. McDermott had no increase during 2018, since her base compensation was increased 2.5% effective October 1, 2017. The 2018 base compensation levels in place reflect market-based compensation and recognize each officer’s level of responsibility, current workload and past experience performing their duties.

21

Our NEOs’ annual base salaries at the end of 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

 


Name

Base Salary

Change

20182017
Steven Pickett$ 494,700$ 485,0002.0%
Lee Ahlstrom (1) 350,000n/a-
Brad Eastman (2) 300,000300,000-
Jay Hilbert 280,500 275,0002.0%
Brendan Sullivan 255,000250,0002.0%
Tonya McDermott (3) 184,500 184,500-
(1)Mr. PickettAhlstrom joined RigNet on May 31, 2016.August 20, 2018.
(2)Mr. Hilbert and Mr. Traupman bothEastman joined RigNet on November 7, 2016.October 30, 2017.
(3)Mr. Jimmerson’s employment ended on December 31, 2015, until he was rehired as our interim CEO on January 7, 2016.Ms. McDermott received a 2.5% increase effective October 1, 2017.

 

Short-Term Incentive Compensation

 

Our NEOs are eligible for annual bonuses in the form of an annual incentive awardbonuses through our STIP. Awards have historically beenmay be paid in stock or cash during the first calendar quarter of the next year after determination of whether financial goals have been achieved. For 2016, our Compensation Committee recommended and our Board approved that NEO2018, STIP bonuses would beperformance awards were paid without in 2019 in the form of RigNet stock based on the five-day average closing price prior toon March 14, 2019, the meeting during which the determination ofdate our financial goal achievement is reported towas reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.

 

BonusAward Opportunities. Under the STIP, each NEO is assigned a target opportunity expressed as a percentage of his base salary. We believe theThe STIP targets,target award opportunities, when considered in connection with the established financial performance goals that must be achieved in order to earn the incentive compensation, providesprovide our executive officers the potential to realize at or above median compensation when compared to our peer group. The threshold, target and maximum bonusaward opportunities for each of our NEOs for 2016, who remained eligible for STIP bonus or employed through December 31, 2016,2018 is set forth below:

 

Name Target STIP Bonus Opportunity
(as a % of Base Salary)
 Maximum Bonus Opportunity
(as a % of Base Salary)
Steven Pickett (1)    
Charles Schneider 70.0%  175.0% 
William Sutton 65.0%  163.0% 
Jay Hilbert (2)    
Ed Traupman (2)    
 

STIP Award Opportunity

(as a % of Current Base Salary)

NameThresholdTargetMaximum
Steven Pickett25.0%100.0%  250.0%
Lee Ahlstrom21.3%85.0%212.5%
Brad Eastman12.5%50.0%125.0%
Jay Hilbert10.0%40.0%100.0%
Brendan Sullivan15.0%60.0%150.0%
Tonya McDermott10.0%40.0%100.0%

 

(1)Mr. Pickett joined the Company on May 31, 2016 and will begin participating in the STIP in 2017 with a target opportunity of 100.0%.
(2)Due to Messrs. Hilbert and Traupman joining RigNet on November 7, 2016, they are not eligible to participate in the STIP for 2016. Their respective offer letters provide an annual STIP target opportunity of 40.0%.

For 2018, there were two categories of performance goals under the STIP: (i) pre-determined Company-wide financial results performance measures (50% weighting) and (ii) pre-established key personal and team objectives (50% weighting), based on STIP funding, which cannot exceed an annual STIP funding maximum for all employees as a group.

 

Financial Performance Metrics and Weightings. Short-term incentive compensationSTIP funding is determined based on performance achieved against the following financial metrics:

 

MetricsWeightThreshold (1)Definition

Management EBITDA

(a non-U.S. GAAP measure)

50.0%90.0%Adjusted EBITDA(2) further adjusted based on budgeted exchange rates and other exceptional items, as approved by the Board.
Consolidated Revenue50.0%80.0%Gross revenue, less credits and uncollectible billings, as reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
Metrics(1)WeightingAs a percentage of target
(2)Definition

A reconciliation of Management EBITDA

(a non-U.S. GAAP measure)

60.0%Adjusted EBITDA1 further adjusted based on budgeted exchange rates, the final STIP compensation accrual, and other exceptional items such as acquisitions, as approved by the Board.
Revenue40.0%Gross revenue less credits and uncollectible billings, as reportedto Net Income is presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.Appendix A to this proxy statement.

 

Total STIP funding is based on actual consolidated performance against the annual AdjustedManagement EBITDA and Consolidated Revenue goals. No STIP compensation is paid if the Company does not achieve the minimum threshold performance levels for both AdjustedManagement EBITDA and Revenue. The following presentsConsolidated Revenue and the maximum compensation that may be earned is 2.5 times target opportunities. However, individual payouts under the STIP cannot exceed an annual STIP funding multipliermaximum for each achievement levelall employees as a percentage of the target, which is the same for Adjusted EBITDA and Revenue.

group.

 Resulting 
Level of Achievement as a % of TargetSTIP Multiplier 
Maximum:125.0%3.00 
 120.0%2.60 
 115.0%2.20 
 110.0%1.80 
 105.0%1.40 
Target:100.0%1.00 
 95.0%0.63 
Threshold:90.0%0.25 
Below Threshold:Less than 90.0%  — 
22

Note that if the results are between two levels the multiplier will be interpolated on a straight-line basis between those levels.

For our executives, short-term incentive compensation is based on the achievement of financial targets and further adjusted based on the achievement of personal objectives for each individual. This table summarizes the 20162018 financial targets and actual results for all of the NEOs (dollars in millions).



1We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus: interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation and amortization, impairment of goodwill, (gain) loss on retirement of property and equipment, change in fair value of derivatives, stock-based compensation and IPO or merger/acquisition costs and related bonuses. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance calculated or presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

 


Name Target
(In Millions)
 Actual
(In Millions)
 Percentage
of Target
 Resulting Multiplier 
Consolidated Management EBITDA (1) $   44.3 $   37.2 83.9% %
Consolidated Revenue (1) 239.5 220.6 92.1% %
Managed Services EBITDA (2) 76.3 57.8 75.8% %
Managed Services Revenue (2) 219.8 199.0 90.6% %

Objective

Threshold (1)
(90%)
 

Target (2)

(100%)

 

Maximum (3)

(125%)

 

Actual

Result

 Percentage
of Target
 

Payout

Management EBITDA$     29.6     $    33.0     $    41.3     $    35.1      106.5% 141.0%
Consolidated Revenue 189.2  236.5  295.6 238.9 101.0% 106.1%
(1)Consolidated measures also serve asBelow the business unit measuresthreshold for Messrs. Schneider, Sutton and Hansen.either metric, no STIP will be earned.
(2)Managed services measures arePerformance at target results in the business unit measurestargeted STIP bonus being earned with proportional adjustment for Mr. Maytorena.performance between threshold and target results and proportional adjustment for performance between target and maximum results.
(3)Performance is capped at a maximum achievement of 125.0% of the target, which would provide a 2.5 times target STIP bonus being earned.

 

Individual Performance. Each NEO has key personal and team objectives, the achievement of which, determines 50.0% of their STIP, with the remaining 50.0% based on the Company wide and business unit financial results, based on computed STIP funding. An NEO’s bonus may be increased or decreased up to 25.0% based on the achievement of specific individual objectives and input from the CEO.

For the CEO’s bonus, the Board has discretion to increase or decrease the bonus up to 100%. For all other executives, the CEO has discretion to increase or decrease the bonus up to 25%, using his judgment of the NEO’s relative contribution to results, subject to Compensation Committee and Board approval. Individual payouts under the STIP cannot exceed 2.5 times target payout.

20162018 Payout Results. The 20162018 STIP bonusaward formula would multiplymultiplies 50.0% of an executive officer’s potential target bonusaward as a percentage of their current base salary, adjusted for partial-year employment, by the sum of (i) 60.0%50.0% of the consolidated Management EBITDA multiplier plus (ii) 40.0%50.0% of the consolidated revenue multipliermultiplier; and add to that sum the computed STIP bonusaward determined under individual performance. However, sinceResults between threshold and target or target and maximum are interpolated on a straight-line basis between those levels.

For 2018, the 2016Board approved STIP thresholds were not achieved, there are no short-term incentive compensation payments (in cash or equity) or discretionary adjustments asresults and calculated payouts for NEOs, including the number of immediately vested shares to be awarded computed based on the closing value of RigNet’s shares on March 14, 2019. The computed payout of STIP is reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” and the “Bonus” columns for 20162018 in the Summary Compensation Table. The shares were awarded on March 20, 2019 causing the reported amounts to differ from the computed payout amounts approved by the Board.

 

Name

Company

Achievement

Individual

& Team

Achievement

Computed

Payout

Vested

Shares

Award Date
Value

Steven Pickett124% 132% $ 711,548 47,248 $ 595,797
Lee Ahlstrom (1)124% 120% 170,200 11,301 142,506
Brad Eastman124% 120% 204,723 13,594 171,420
Jay Hilbert (2)124% 58% 109,629 6,124 91,788
Brendan Sullivan124% 113% 202,495 13,446 169,554
Tonya McDermott124% 120% 103,745 6,889 86,870
(1)Mr. Ahlstrom’s 2018 STIP award was determined on a pro-rata basis based on his earnings since joining RigNet on August 20, 2018.
(2)Mr. Hilbert received 25% of his STIP payout in a performance award that will be paid in 1,155 shares during 2019 upon achievement of a specific individual goal that was initiated during 2018.

Long-term Incentive Compensation

 

Long-term incentive compensation is intended to enhance our ability to retain executive talent over a longer period of time, reward long-term efforts that enhance future value of the Company and provide executives with a form of reward that aligns their interests with those of our stockholders. Our executives may receive long-term incentive awards annually as the Compensation Committee determines consistent with the objectives described above.

 

Our 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan permits the award of (i) incentive and non-qualified stock options, (ii) stock appreciation rights, (iii) restricted stock, (iv) restricted stock units, (v) performance stock, (vi) performance units, (vii) director awards (viii) annual cash incentive awards, (ix) cash-based awards, (x) substitution awards or (xi) other stock-based awards, as approved by the Board or its designated committee. No further awards can be made under our 2006 Plan.

During 2018, the Committee issued performance units, time-based restricted stock units and 2001 Plans.stock options to our executive officers. The Committee believes these award types strike an appropriate balance between long-term stock price appreciation, mid-term operating results and retentionleadership stability and best align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders, as follows:

 

ObjectiveAward TypeIncentive for Compensation
Long-term stock appreciationStock OptionStock price appreciation over ten-yearsseven years
Mid-term operating resultsPerformance Unit (“PU”)Specific performance achievement over three years
RetentionLeadership StabilityRestricted Stock Unit (“RSU”)Continued employment over four years
23

In 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee established long-term incentive compensation targets as a percentage of base compensationsalary for each of our NEOs. This target was used to determine the value of the long-term incentive awards made to each executive. In establishing each of the targets, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things, the data obtained from the compensation peer group study, that was adjusted for market increases,recent negotiations related to changes in our leadership team, the role and responsibility of each executive, competitive factors, individual performance, the amount of stock-based equity compensation already held bypreviously awarded to the executive, the non-equity compensation received by the executive, the total number of stock and option awards to be granted to all participants during the year and the discretion and judgment of the Compensation Committee. In July 2018, based on comparable equity award provisions of our peer group, we updated our RSU and Option award provisions to incorporate accelerated vesting upon termination following a change of control.

 

Generally, time-based restricted stock unitOn March 7, 2018, as part of our normal annual review of equity awards and option awards will vest over four years, with 25.0% ofannual compensation, we made the shares vesting onfollowing equity grants to each of the first, second, third and fourth year anniversaryour NEOs, of the grant date or other date specified in the grant award assuming continued employment, and options expire on the tenth anniversary date of the applicable award agreement, unless terminated earlier.


Long-term incentive compensation has typically beenwhich (i) 40% was in the form of equity awards allocated 30.0% to restricted stock awards and 70.0% to stock options. During 2016 we determined annual equity awards to senior leaders should include a balance oftime-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance units (“PUs”) to create a shared incentive structure that drives achievementvests in four equal installments on March 15 of specific strategic corporate initiatives.each year, beginning on March 15, 2019, (ii) 50% was in the form of PUs vestthat are eligible for vesting based on achievement of three defined performance goals over a three-year period. period as discussed below, and (iii) 10% was in the form of stock options that vest ratably over four years and expire in seven years.

NameTarget Value of
RSUs, PUs & Options
Steven Pickett$ 494,700
Lee Ahlstrom (1) -
Brad Eastman300,000
Jay Hilbert252,450
Brendan Sullivan102,000
Tonya McDermott129,150
(1)Mr. Ahlstrom joined RigNet on August 20, 2018. Mr. Ahlstrom’s target for future years is 100% of his base salary.

Each performance goal for the PUs has a specific threshold, target and maximum performance level resulting in payouts of 30.0%20.0%, 100.0% and 300.0%, respectively, with proportional adjustment for performance between each level. Performance results are measured annually and generally vesta portion of the PUs is earned following each annual performance period with payout(subject to achievement of specific pre-established annual performance measures). The PUs vest upon completion of the three-year performance period, or sooner if an individual’s employment ceases due to retirement, death, or disability or following a change of control.

 

Grants were made on March 10, 2016, as part of our normal annual review of equity awards and annual compensation. During 2016, the Compensation Committee initiated an equity award program using long-term PUs with formulaic payouts based on specific multiple-year performance metrics. For 2016, long-term incentive equity awards were allocated 70.0% to RSUs and 30.0% to PUs for our NEOs, except for Mr. Jimmerson, who received equity awards allocated 50.0% to each RSUs and PUs, due to his interim role with our Company. Mr. Pickett was awarded stock options as a signing bonus upon joining the Company. He was also awarded long-term incentive equity awards allocated 70.0%, to RSUs and 30.0% to PUs, as agreed to in his employment agreement and in alignment with his prorated long-term incentive compensation target as our CEO and President. These equity awards should enhance our ability to retain executives and align individual performance with the objectives of our stockholders.

The PU components of our 2018 LTIP grants are designed to incentivize growth and financial performance over a three-year period.

The PUs granted in 2018 to our NEOs, are contingent upon the achievement of specified performance metrics as shown below. These awards generally become payable in 2021 based on achievement of the weighted performance metrics shown below, with payment amounts prorated for performance between the established levels.

 

The PUs granted in 2016 to our NEOs, except for Mr. Jimmerson, are contingent upon the achievement of specified performance metrics as shown below. These awards generally become payable in 2019 based on achievement of the three, weighted performance metrics shown below, with payment amounts prorated for performance between the established levels.

Performance Goals Measures Performance
Period
 Threshold
(1)
 Target
(2)
 Maximum
(3)
 Weight Actual
Results
 Resulting
Multiplier
 
Consolidated Revenue
Overall revenue growth
 2016  $ 203.2  $ 239.0  $ 274.9 10.0% $ 220.6 0.486 
 2017  208.2  245.0  281.8 10.0% n/a n/a 
 2018  238.8  281.0  323.2 20.0% n/a n/a 
Addressable Rigs Service Level
Market share
 2016 31% 33% 38%   7.5% 26.8% 
 2017 32% 34% 39%   7.5%  n/a  n/a 
 2018 33% 35% 40% 15.0%  n/a n/a 
Maritime Initiative and Reseller Initiative Revenue
Strategic Initiative performance
 2016  $ 12.5  $ 16.5  $ 20.5   7.5% $ 10.1  
 2017  20.0  25.0  30.0   7.5% n/a  n/a 
 2018  40.0  48.0  56.0 15.0%  n/a n/a 

Performance Goals MeasuresPerformance
Period

Threshold

(1)

Target

(2)

Maximum

(3)

Actual
Results

Resulting

Multiplier

2018 Performance Units      
Financial Factor:
Consolidated Revenue
2018$ 221.6 $ 277.0 $ 332.4 $ 238.9 24.2%
2019316.0 395.0 474.0 n/a n/a
2020425.6 532.0 638.4 n/a n/a
Consolidated Management EBITDA201832.8 41.0 49.2 35.1 23.1%
 201950.4 63.0 75.6 n/a n/a
 202074.4 93.0 111.6 n/a n/a

Market Share Adjustment Factor:

Qualifying Product Market Share Service Factor

20183.0 5.0 7.0 7.0+ 20.0%
 20193.0 5.0 7.0 n/a n/a
 20203.0 5.0 7.0 n/a n/a

Addressable Rigs Service Factor

 

201829.5% 31.0% 32.5% 31.5% 6.7%
201929.5% 31.0% 32.5% n/a n/a
202029.5% 31.0% 32.5% n/a n/a
(1)Below the threshold, no units will be earned.
(2)Performance at target results in the targeted units being earned with proportional adjustment for performance between threshold and target results and proportional adjustment for performance between target and maximum results.
(3)Performance is capped at the maximum and achievement of the maximum would result in three times the target units being earned.
24

Mr. Jimmerson wasThe financial performance factor for PU awards incorporates equal weighting of Consolidated Revenue and Management EBITDA (as defined in “Short Term Incentive Compensation”). The financial performance factor also granted a PU award on March 10, 2016 for the one-year performance period of 2016 to incentivize his performance and retention as our interim CEO and president. However, due to his employment ending on May 31, 2016, units vesting under the award were based on the number of days he workedincentivized acquisitions as a key component of our strategy. The market share performance factor incorporates the percentage of addressable rigs served and our ability to introduce qualified new products to our customers. We believe these performance measures incentivize continued growth of market share in our core managed communications business to the total numberoil and gas industry, strategic expansion into adjacent remote communications markets and introduction of days duringnew products that move us “up the performance award period.stack.”

 

In addition,Our performance during 2018 achieved the following results over the past three years of performance awards:

 

For 2018, the Board approved the following performance achievement results and earned shares for the NEO’s outstanding PU awards.

NamePU Target Shares Performance Achievement
2018
Award
2017
Award
2016
Award
 2018
Award
2017
Award
2016
Award

Earned

Shares

Steven Pickett3,3893,7203,368 60.5%-0.05%2,052
Lee Ahlstromn/an/an/a n/an/an/an/a
Brad Eastman2,096n/an/a 60.5%n/an/a1,268
Jay Hilbert1,7291,899n/a 60.5%-n/a1,046
Brendan Sullivan1,048n/an/a 60.5%n/an/a634
Tonya McDermott902966n/a 60.5%-n/a546

2019 Changes

Annually, the Compensation Committee evaluates each component of total compensation for our employees and recommends changes to the Board to realize our key compensation objectives and incentivize performance and leadership stability. The Board approved the following recommended changes with respect to 2019 compensation:

Increases to base salaries averaging 3.1% for our NEOs;
Added an individual cash flow objective to STIP for each of our NEOs;
Reduced the maximum payout on PUs from 300% to 250%;
Modified vesting periods for option and RSU awards from four years to three years consistent with our peer group;
Updated the PU metrics to reflect a compounded annual growth rate and three-year average Management EBITDA targets, without assumed acquisitions; and
Standardized severance packages, based on position.

Effective April 1, 2019 (or January 1, 2019 in the case of Ms. McDermott), base salaries were increased for each of the NEOs as follows:

Name

Base Salary

% Change

 2019 2018
Steven Pickett$ 507,831$ 494,7002.7%
Lee Ahlstrom 360,500350,0003.0%
Brad Eastman309,000300,0003.0%
Jay Hilbert (1)280,500280,5000.0%
Brendan Sullivan267,750255,0005.0%
Tonya McDermott 190,035184,5003.0%
(1)Mr. Hilbert has been approved for a 2.0% base compensation increase upon achievement of a specific individual goal.
25

On March 10, 2016, in order20, 2019, as approved by the Compensation Committee, the following RSU, option and PU awards were made to our NEOs, as part of our normal annual review of equity awards to incentivize our executives for the long-term success of our Company and to provide critical retention of Messrs. Schneider, Sutton, Maytorena, and Hansen, we awarded time-based RSUs that vest in full on March 19, 2019, assuming continued employment. The retention awards for Messrs. Maytorena and Hansen were forfeited and cancelled when their respective employment ended during 2016.incentives.

 

Name

  Number of Securities Underlying (1) 

Long-term

RSU
Awards
 
Option
Awards
Performance
Awards (2)
Steven Pickett 16,508 6,329 $ 197,880  
Lee Ahlstrom 11,680 4,478 140,000  
Brad Eastman 10,011 3,838 120,000  
Jay Hilbert 8,424 3,230 100,980  
Brendan Sullivan 5,106 1,958 61,200  
Tonya McDermott 8,878  - -  
(1)The unit awards vest ratably over three years beginning March 20, 2020.
(2)This represents units to be awarded for the achievement of target performance thresholds over a three-year period and vest on July 1, 2022, with a potential for a two times performance multiplier.

Nondiscriminatory Health and Welfare Benefits

 

Our benefits, such as our basic health benefits, short-term and long-term disability, life insurance, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance are intended to provide a stable array of support to executives and their families throughout various stages of their careers, and these core benefits are provided to all employees based on the regional programs regardless of their individual performance levels. All U.S. employees have the option to participate in the 401(k) plan, which allows participants to defer up to 100.0% of their annual compensation, subject to the cap set by the Internal Revenue Code. As of January 2016,plan. In 2018, the Company is no longer matching employee contributions in the 401(k) plan. However, in 2015, our 401(k) plan provided all eligible employees the Company’sreinstated matching contribution based on 100.0% of the first 2.0%3.0% and 50.0% of the next 4.0%2% of eligible employee contributions.an employee’s contributions, up to the maximum permitted by law. Employee elective deferrals and employee matching contributions are immediately vested and non-forfeitable upon contribution to the 401(k) plan.

 


Perquisites

 

Perquisites

We believe in a simple, straight-forward compensation program. Consistent with the Compensation Committee’s strategy, no perquisites or other personal benefits are expected to exceed $10,000 annually for any of our named executive officers, except with regard to negotiated relocation expense reimbursement.assistance.

 

Tax and Accounting Implications

 

In the review and establishment of our compensation programs, we consider the anticipated accounting and tax implications to us and our executives. While we consider the applicable accounting and tax treatment of alternative forms of equity compensation, these factors alone are not dispositive, and we also consider the cash and non-cash impact of the programs and whether a program is consistent with our overall compensation philosophy and objectives.

 

Deductibility of Compensation and Tax Obligations

 

Our Compensation Committee does not have any policies concerning the payment of tax obligations on behalf of our employees. We are required by law to withhold a portion of every compensation payment we make to our employees. In the case of noncash compensation, that means either (i) we withhold a portion of the noncash compensation payment and pay cash to the appropriate tax authorities, or (ii) the employees make a cash payment directly to us in lieu of our withholding a portion of the noncash compensation.compensation or (iii) we withhold a portion of cash compensation payments equal to the tax owed and pay cash to the appropriate tax authorities. All payments to or on behalf of our employees, including tax payments, are considered compensation and are evaluated by our Compensation Committee as part of our overall compensation packages.

 

As part of its role, the Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of executive compensation. Section 162(m)However, under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the Internal Revenue Code imposesexemption for qualifying performance-based compensation was repealed for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. As a limit onresult, compensation paid to our executive officers after December 31, 2017 in excess of $1 million may not be deductible unless it qualifies for certain transition relief. While the amount ofCompany will monitor guidance and developments in this area, the Compensation Committee believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that attracts, retains and rewards the executive talent necessary for our success. Consequently, the Compensation Committee may pay or provide, and has paid or provided, compensation that we may deduct in any one year with respectis not tax deductible or is otherwise limited as to the CEO and each of our next three most highly compensated NEOs, unless specific and detailed criteria are satisfied. Performance-based compensation, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, is fully deductible if the programs are approved by stockholders and meet other requirements. We believe that grants of equity awards under our existing stock plans qualify as performance-based for purposes of satisfying the conditions of Section 162(m), thereby permitting us to receive a federal income tax deduction in connection with such awards. In general, we have determined that we will not seek to limit executive compensation so that it is deductible under Section 162(m). However, from time to time, we monitor whether it might be in our interests to structure our compensation programs to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m). We seek to maintain flexibility in compensating our executives in a manner designed to promote our corporate goals and therefore our Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible. Our Compensation Committee will continue to assess the impact of Section 162(m) on our compensation practices and determine what further action, if any, is appropriate.deductibility.

26

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

 

We account for stock-based payments for all awards under our 2010 Omnibus Incentive and the 2006 Long-Term Incentive and the 2001 Performance Stock Option Plans in accordance with the requirements of ASC Topic 718, subtopic 10, section 10,Stock Compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews stock compensation grant date value in connection with granting equity awards.

 

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs

 

We review our compensation programs company-wide to assess whether they encourage our employees to take unnecessary or excessive risks that could have a material adverse effect on our business. We have concluded that our programs are appropriately tailored to encourage employees to grow our business, but not to incentincentivize them to do so in a way that poses unnecessary or excessive material risk to us. For example, the STIP and our long-term incentive compensation,LTIP, which are our two primary performance-based compensation programs, balance each other by providing compensation that rewards short-term and long-term performance. The STIP balances risk by considering a mix of performance goals, capping the maximum payout a participant can receive and allowsallowing the Compensation Committee to approve the final amount of all bonuses,payments, while the long-term incentive awards include both (i) time-based equity awards that have four-year vesting schedules to encourage a focus on long-term growth and that support management retention and (ii) performance-based awards to incentivize and reward long-term performance. In addition, we have various policies, such as our clawback, anti-hedging and executive equity ownership policies that are designed to discourage undue risk-taking or manipulation of results. In addition, the portion of the executives’ compensation comprised ofcomprising the STIP and long-term performance awardsLTIP is sized to encourage appropriate risk-taking that is aligned with the long-term health of the Company.

 

Clawback Policy

 

In March 2015, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board unanimously approved the adoption ofThe Company has a clawback policy (the “Policy”) for the recoupment of incentive-based compensation from its current or former executive officers and such other senior executives and employees (“Covered Executives”) under certain circumstances.circumstances following a restatement of the Company’s financial statements. Under the Policy,clawback policy, the Company may at the Board’s discretion, recover from Covered Executives short and long-term cash incentives, stock options, stock


appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and/or performance units (“Incentive Compensation”incentive compensation”). The clawback will include all incentive compensation in excess of the Incentive Compensationamounts or shares that would have been paid or distributed according to the financial statements, as restated. The Company may also require,requires, as a condition to the grant of any incentive compensation, a Covered Executive to agree in writing to abide by the terms of the Policy. clawback policy.

 

Policy Against Hedging

 

We prohibit our executive officers and directors from engaging in short-term or speculative transactions involving companyCompany securities, including activities involving short selling our securities, hedging their ownership in our securities by the purchase or sale of options of any kind, whether puts, calls or other derivative securities, purchasing of companyCompany securities in the open market on margin or pledging securities against loans or similar arrangements.

 

Executive EquityStock Ownership Policy

 

We encouragerequire our executives to hold a significant equity interest in the Company through our Company. In 2015, we adopted a new stock ownership policy, which superseded and replaced the former stock ownership guidelines adopted in 2013 by the Company. The new policy requires certain executives and directors to hold shares with a value equal to a multiple of their base salary.salary or annual retainers. Our CEO is required to hold equity shares of our Company with a multiple ofminimum aggregate value equal to four (4) times annual base salary and our CFO isand all other executive officers are required to hold equity shares of our Company with a minimum aggregate value equal to two (2) times their respective annual base salary. All other executive officersNon-employee Board members are required to hold two (2) times and non-employee Board membersequity shares of our Company with a minimum aggregate value equal to three (3) times their annual base salary and annual retainers, respectively.Board retainer. Each executive officer and director must attain the applicable stock ownership level within five (5) years ofby November 3, 2015, the effective date of the policy,2020, or the fifth anniversary of his or her becoming subject to the policy, whichever shall be the later to occur. To ensure covered individuals make continuous progress towards their respective stock ownership levels, they must own 25% of their total applicable stock ownership level by the end of the second fiscal year after becoming subject to the policy, 50% by the end of the third fiscal year, 75% by the end of the fourth fiscal year and 100% by the end of the fifth fiscal year.

27

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officers (including our former CEO and former interim CEO both of whom served during some portion of 2016),Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, our three other most highly compensated executive officers and twoone additional former named executive officersofficer who served during 20162018 for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152018, 2017 and 2014.2016.

 

Name and Principal Position Year  Salary Bonus
(1)
 Stock
Awards
(2)
 Option
Awards
(2)
 Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
(3)
 All Other
Compensation
(4)
 Total 
Steven Pickett (5)  2016  $285,404 $282,917 $253,943 $646,000 $—   $32,590 $1,500,854 
Chief Executive Officer and                          
President                          
Charles Schneider (6)  2016   325,000    604,176      480  929,656 
Senior Vice President and  2015   22,500  125,000  97,596  227,265      472,361 
Chief Financial Officer                          
William Sutton  2016   262,000    515,760      480  778,240 
Senior Vice President and  2015   262,000    100,168  241,257    10,960  614,385 
General Counsel  2014   259,000    114,343  253,874  190,736  360  818,313 
Jay Hilbert (7)  2016   42,308    165,075      68  207,451 
Senior Vice President, Sales                          
Edward Traupman (8)  2016   37,008    88,040      59  125,107 
Vice President, Systems Integration & Automation                          
Martin Jimmerson (9)  2016   167,596    600,000      18,356  785,952 
Former Interim Chief Executive Officer and President &  2015   288,600    74,836  176,196    1,010,960  1,550,592 
Former Chief Financial Officer  2014   287,125    129,349  287,078  226,262  360  930,174 
Mark Slaughter (10)  2016   33,519          1,813,692  1,847,211 
Former Chief Executive Officer  2015   415,000    224,558  540,499    10,960  1,191,017 
and President  2014   404,723  46,480  244,359  542,393  464,800  360  1,703,115 
Hector Maytorena (10)  2016   230,539    575,134      545,356  1,351,029 
Former Group Vice President,  2015   264,230    79,492  191,450    37,610  572,782 
Managed Services   2014   235,250  25,578  67,321  149,421  170,520  360  648,450 
Morten Hagland Hansen (10)  2016   123,846    399,554      261,297  784,697 
Former Senior Vice President  2015   230,000    74,643  179,719    52,251  536,613 
and Chief Technology Officer                          


Name and Principal PositionYearSalaryBonus
(1)
Stock
Awards

(2)
Option
Awards

(2)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation

(3)
All Other 
Compensation

(4)
Total
  Steven Pickett2018$ 492,275$             -$ 440,76959,912  $ 711,548$ 261,933$ 1,966,437
 Chief Executive Officer and2017 485,000  21,951484,996             -   439,014 56,097 1,487,058
 President2016 285,404282,917253,943646,000   - 32,590 1,500,854
  Lee Ahlstrom (5)2018127,885 ---170,200-298,085
 Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer           
 Brad Eastman2018$300,000-272,64337,057204,72311,654
826,077
 Senior Vice President &        
 General Counsel        
  Jay Hilbert2018279,125-224,929
 30,573109,6298,850
653,106
 Senior Vice President, Sales2017275,00055,000247,504 -17,752480
595,736
  201642,308            -  165,075 -               -68 207,451
  Brendan Sullivan2018253,750 -136,32118,528202,495
9,855620,949
 Chief Technology/Information Officer2017148,077 ---84,91533,998 266,990
  Tonya McDermott2018184,500 -223,18215,951103,7457,157534,535
 

Interim Chief Financial Officer

and Vice President Tax and Treasury

        
         
          
(1)Bonuses for Mr. Pickett represent the Compensation Committee’s discretionary 2014adjustment to his 2017 formulaic STIP payout and his Pickett’s guaranteed 2016 cash bonuses based on individual performance andbonus of seven-twelfths of his base compensation, which was paid in 2016,January 2017. For Mr. Schneider’s 2016 sign-onHilbert, the bonus and in 2017 Mr. Pickett’srepresents his guaranteed cash bonus.STIP payment.

(2)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value for stock and option awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the determination of these amounts which represent grant date fair value are included in Note 10, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

(3)Non-equity incentive plan compensation reflects the Board approved cash bonusesSTIP payout amounts as reviewed by the Compensation Committee based on the achievement of performance metrics under our 2014 STIP program for the year. These bonusesamounts are paid in the month of Marchyear following the year in which they were earned. The Board determines annually if these bonuses are to be settled in cash or shares of stock. For 2018 and 2017, the amounts were settled in immediately vested stock awards – see the table on page 23 under “2018 Payout Results”.

(4)Other compensation represents compensation benefits provided for in employment agreements and other company-wide benefit programs. Benefits during 2016in 2018 for all NEOs include 401(k) match on employee contributions limited to 4.0%, if the employee contributes at least 5.0%. Other compensation also includes relocation and related costs in 2018 for Mr. Pickett of $255,288 and in 2017 for Mr. Pickett and Mr. Sullivan of $55,617 and $33,718, respectively. In addition, other compensation in 2017 and 2016 includes life insurance coverage equal to two times annual base pay not to exceed $500,000 as well as for Mr. Pickett relocation and related costs of $32,310, and for Messrs. Slaughter, Jimmerson, Maytorena and Hansen include separation benefits in connection with the termination of their respective employment (see note 10 below). In 2015, other compensation includes maximum 401K match benefits of $10,600, Mr. Jimmerson’s separation pay under his agreement to separate as our Chief Financial Officer effective December 31, 2015, and tuition reimbursement for Messrs. Maytorena and Hansen of $37,250 and $41,291, respectively, as well as life insurance coverageall NEOs equal to two times annual base pay not to exceed $500,000. Other than the relocation assistance and tuition reimbursement amounts reflected above, we did not provide perquisites and other personal benefits exceeding a value of $10,000 to our NEOs.

(5)Mr. PickettAhlstrom joined the Company on May 31, 2016August 20, 2018 and will participatebegan participating in the Company’s STIP plan beginning in 2017.2018, on a prorated basis.

CEO Pay Ratio

Mr. Pickett had total compensation of $1,966,437 for 2018, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement. Our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2018, excluding Mr. Pickett, was $62,877, which considers both cash and equity compensation. As a result, we estimate that Mr. Pickett’s 2018 annual total compensation was approximately 31.27 times that of our median employee.

With respect to the identification of the median of the total annual compensation of all employees, as well as the determination of the annual total compensation of Mr. Pickett, we used the following methodology:

·As of November 20, 2018, the date we used for determination, our workforce consisted of 597 full time employees and 24 independent contractors, with 49% located in the United States.

28

·To find the median of the annual total compensation of all employees other than Mr. Pickett’s agreement provides for additional 2016Pickett, we used the amount of annualized cash compensation, of seven-twelfths of his base compensation, which was paid in January 2017.excluding overtime pay, consistent with amounts to be reported to the relevant taxing authorities.

 

(6)·Mr. Schneider joinedBased on this information, we identified the Company on December 8, 2015 and began participationmedian employee, a technical services provider located in the Company’s incentive plans beginning in 2016. Mr. Schneider’s agreement provides for a sign-on bonus of $455,000 of which $125,000 was paid in cash in January 2016 and the balance was provided through his December 2016 equity awards.United States.

 

(7)·Mr. Hilbert joinedWith respect to our median employee, we added together all compensation components as set forth in the Company on November 7, 2016. His agreement providesSummary Compensation Table for sign-on equity awards of 7,500 stock options and 7,500 restricted stock units, which were awarded on November 7, 2016.2018 determining our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2018.

 

(8)Mr. Traupman joined the Company on November 7, 2016. His agreement provides for sign-on equity awards of 4,000 stock options and 4,000 restricted stock units, which were awarded on November 7, 2016.

(9)Mr. Jimmerson’s employment as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ended with the Company on December 31, 2015 for which he was paid a separation payment, which is included in All Other Compensation above. He was reemployed as our interim CEO and President from January 7, 2016 through June 1, 2016 and was paid $18,356 for unused vacation at June 1, 2016.

(10)The employment of Messrs. Slaughter, Maytorena, and Hansen ended with the Company during 2016. Each was paid a separation payment pursuant to his employment contract as described below, which is included in All Other Compensation above at $1,813,692 $544,916 and $261,039 for Messrs. Slaughter, Maytorena, and Hansen, respectively.

Employment Agreements

 

On March 15, 2017, consistent with our market-based pay philosophy and as discussed above under “The Compensation Setting Process – Role of Compensation Consultant”, our Compensation Committee considered the current economic market conditions, compensation data obtained in 2016 and each executive’s responsibility related to the current size of our Company. Effective April 1, 2017, no changes to our NEO’s base compensation or the STIP target levels were approved by the Board.

Employment Agreements

Mr. Pickett

 

The Company has an agreement to employ Mr. Pickett as a Chief Executive Officer and President. His initial annual base salary was set at $485,000.$485,000, subject to increases from time to time. Under the agreement, pursuant toif the Company terminates Mr. Pickett’s termination of employment without “cause” (other than for death or shoulddisability), the Company, or its successor, terminates Mr. Pickett terminateon or within two years after a “change of control event,” as defined in the Treasury Regulations issued under Section 409A of the Code, or Mr. Pickett terminates his employment for “good reason” within two years of a “change of control” as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code,, he is entitled to receive i) a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to two times his then annual base salary and target bonus for the period in which the termination occurs; ii) COBRA premiums for up to 18 months, with such premiums paid to Mr. Pickett on a fully grossed-up after-tax basis, if necessary, for Mr. Pickett not to be subject to tax under Section 105 of the Internal Revenue Code.Code; and iii) the immediate vesting of the Signing Bonus stock options (as defined in the agreement). In addition, if Mr. Pickett’s employment terminates without “cause”, for “good reason”, within two years of a “change of control” or due to death or disability, all outstanding unvested equity awards other than performance units shall automatically vest in full not withstanding anything in the award to the contrary and shall remain exercisable for the full term of the applicable award. If, after a change of control, the successor does not assume or continue such equity award, such award shall automatically vest in full on the date of the change of control.

 

If Mr. Pickett’s termination is due to death or disability or he resigns without good reason, he would be entitled to, in addition to vesting of equity awards as discussed above, all unpaid salary, unused vacation, and certain business expenses. In addition, upon his employment ceasing due to death or disability, all equity awards outstanding as of the effective date of his agreement shall automatically vest in full and shall remain exercisable for the term specified in the applicable award agreement.

 


In addition, Mr. Pickett is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 24 months from his termination date.

 

Under the agreement, “cause” is defined as any of the following: (i) Mr. Pickett’s plea of guilty or nolo contendre, or conviction of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude; (ii) any act by Mr. Pickett’sPickett of fraud or dishonesty with respect to any aspect of our business including, but not limited to, falsification of our records; (iii) intentional misconduct by Mr. Pickett that is materially injurious to us (monetarily or otherwise); (iv) Mr. Pickett’s breach of any confidentiality, noncompetition or non-solicitation obligations to the Company; (v) commencement by Mr. Pickett of employment with an unrelated employer; (vi) material violation by Mr. Pickett of any of our written policies, including but not limited to any harassment and/or non-discrimination policies; and (vii) Mr. Pickett’s gross negligence in the performance of his duties. Mr. Pickett would not be deemed to have been terminated for cause under clauses (ii) through (vii) above unless the determination of whether cause exists is made by a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of not less than three-fourths of the entire membership of the Board (excluding Mr. Pickett, if a member) at a meeting of the Board that was called for the purpose of considering such termination (after 15 days’ notice to Mr. Pickett and an opportunity for Mr. Pickett, together with Mr. Pickett’s counsel, to be heard before the Board and, if reasonably possible, to cure the breach that is the alleged basis for cause) finding that, in the good faith opinion of the Board, Mr. Pickett was guilty of conduct constituting cause and specifying the particulars thereof in detail.

 

Under the agreement, “good reason” means (i) a material adverse change in Mr. Pickett’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities, (ii) a reduction in Mr. Pickett’s base salary or the taking of any action by us that would materially diminish the annual bonus opportunities of Mr. Pickett, (iii) the relocation of the our principal executive offices by more than 50 miles from where such offices are located on the first day of employment or Mr. Pickett being based at any office other than our principal or hemisphere management executive offices, except for travel reasonably required in the performance of Mr. Pickett’s duties, (iv) a material breach of the agreement by us, or (v) the failure of a successor to us to assume the agreement.

 

If Mr. Pickett terminates employment for “good reason”, he shall provide written notice within 45 days of the occurrence of any such reduction, failure, change or breach upon which Mr. Pickett intends to base his resignation, and we shall have 45 days to remedy the reduction, failure, change or breach. If such reduction, failure, change or breach is not remedied, Mr. Pickett must terminate his employment within 120 days of occurrence of the condition for the termination to be considered “good reason”.

 

A “Change of Control”control” shall have the same meaning as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the agreement, “disability” means Mr. Pickett is (i) unable to perform substantially his duties for us with or without reasonable accommodation as a result of physical or mental impairment that is reasonably expected to last twelve months, as supported by a written opinion from Mr. Pickett’s physician and is (ii) receiving long-term disability benefits from our insured long-term disability plan.

29

Mr. Ahlstrom

 

Mr. Schneider

The CompanyWe entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. SchneiderAhlstrom, effective November 23, 2015on August 20, 2018. In that agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. Ahlstrom as a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. His initialOfficer with a starting salary of $350,000, subject to increase from time to time, and annual short-term and long-term incentive target bonuses of 85.0% and 100.0% of base salary, was setrespectively. In the case of Mr. Ahlstrom’s employment being terminated without cause or upon a change of control, he would participate in RigNet’s severance package that provides two weeks of base compensation for every year of service with a minimum of four weeks and a maximum of twenty-six weeks as well as one month of COBRA premiums at $325,000, and on April 22, 2016 his agreement was amendeda maximum of $1,000 per month for every year of service up to modify certain terms related to termination payments.a maximum of 6 months, paid in a lump sum payment. Mr. Schneider, under the amended agreement, pursuant to Mr. Schneider’s termination of employment without “cause” or should Mr. Schneider terminate his employment for “good reason” within two years of aAhlstrom would also receive “change of control” as definedbenefits in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, he is entitled to receive (i) a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to one and a half times his then annual base salary and target bonus for the period in which the termination occurs; (ii) immediate vesting of all unvestedconnection with outstanding equity awards (iii) COBRA premiums for uppursuant to 12 months,the provisions within our 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended. The terms of “cause” and (iv) outplacement services not to exceed $20,000.“change of control” are defined consistently with the same definition of those same terms described under Mr. Sullivan’s agreement below. In addition, he is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 12 months from his termination date.

 

Under the agreement, “cause” is defined as any of the following: (i) Mr. Schneider plea of guilty or nolo contendre, or conviction of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude; (ii) any act by Mr. Schneider’s of fraud or dishonesty with respect to any aspect of our business including, but not limited to, falsification of our records; (iii) Mr. Schneider’s failure to perform his duties (other than by reason of an illness or a disability); (iv) engagement in misconduct by Mr. Schneider that is materially injurious to us (monetarily or otherwise); (v) Mr. Schneider’s breach of any confidentiality, noncompetition or non-solicitation obligations to the Company; (vi) commencement by Mr. Schneider of employment with an unrelated employer; (vii) material violation by Mr. Schneider of any of our written policies, including but not limited to any harassment and/or non-discrimination policies; and (viii) Mr. Schneider’s gross negligence in the performance of his duties. The terms of “good reason” and “Change of Control” are defined consistently with the definitions of those same terms described under Mr. Pickett’s agreement above.


Mr. SuttonEastman

 

We entered into an employmentoffer letter agreement with Mr. Sutton,Eastman, effective on March 14, 2012.September 11, 2017. In that agreement we agreed to employ Mr. SuttonEastman as theour Senior Vice President and& General Counsel. Mr. Sutton’s initial annual baseCounsel, wits a starting salary was set at $235,000,of $300,000, subject to increase from time to time, and his annual short-term and long-term incentive target bonus potential is at least 60.0%bonuses of his base salary. 

If Mr. Sutton’s employment is terminated for cause, he is entitled to (i) any earned but unpaid50% and 100% of base salary, (ii) any accrued but unused current year vacation up to a maximum of four weeks, plus up to the maximum unused carry-over of vacation provided in our written vacation policy then in effect and (iii) all reasonable, well documented, unreimbursed business expenses incurred by Mr. Sutton.

respectively. Under the agreement, if we terminate Mr. Sutton’sEastman’s employment without “cause” and other than for death or disability or Mr. SuttonEastman terminates his employment with us for “good reason”, he is entitled to (i) a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to the sum of his then annual base salary and target bonus for the bonus period in which the termination occurs; (ii) COBRA premiums for up to 18 months, with such premiums paid to Mr. Sutton on a fully grossed-up after-tax basis, if necessary, for Mr. Sutton not to be subject to tax under Section 105 of the Internal Revenue Code; (iii) a pro-rated amount equal to the annual bonus that would have been paid to Mr. Sutton had he remained employed through the end of the calendar year in which his employment terminates, to be calculated based on the level of achievement of our financial targets under the STIP at the end of the calendar year; provided that (a) any such determination shall be made without application of any modifier that is based on individual performance, and (b) such bonus amount achieved, if any, shall be prorated based on a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days of Mr. Sutton’s employment during the applicable calendar year and the denominator of which is 365 (such prorated amount shall be paid during the immediately following calendar year, and not later than when the STIP participants are paid); (iv) if applicable, an amount equal to the unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar year that would have been paid to executive had he remained employed through the date of the bonus payments under the STIP for the prior calendar year, which payment shall be made without application of any modifier that is based on individual performance; and (v) outplacement services not to exceed $20,000.

If Mr. Sutton’s termination is due to death or disability, he is entitled to (i) a pro-rated amount equal to the annual bonus that would have been paid to Mr. Sutton had he remained employed through the end of the calendar year in which his employment terminates, to be calculated based on the level of achievement of our financial targets under the STIP at the end of the calendar year; provided that (a) any such determination shall be made without application of any modifier that is based on individual performance, and (b) such bonus amount achieved, if any, shall be prorated based on a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days of Mr. Sutton’s employment during the applicable calendar year and the denominator of which is 365. Such prorated amount shall be paid during the immediately following calendar year, and not later than, when the STIP participants are paid and (ii) if applicable, an amount equal to the unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar year that would have been paid to executive had he remained employed through the date of the bonus payments under the STIP for the prior calendar year, which payment shall be made without application of any modifier that is based on individual performance. In addition, all equity awards shall automatically vest in full and shall remain exercisable for the term specified in the applicable award agreement.

If Mr. Sutton terminates his employment for “good reason” or his employment is terminated by us for any reason other than for cause and such termination occurs within two years on or after a “change of control” as defined in Section 409A, he is entitled to twelve months of the Internal Revenue Code (a “Changesalary continuation. The terms of Control”), all equity awards outstanding at the date“cause,” “good reason” and “change of the agreement shall automatically vest in full and shall remain exercisable for the term specified in the applicable award agreement. In addition, if any such equity award is not assumed or continued by our successor after a Change of Control, such award shall automatically vest and become exercisable and/or payable on the date of the Change of Control.

Under the agreement, “cause” and “good reason”control” are defined consistently with the definitionssame definition of thethose same terms included indescribed under Mr. Pickett’sSullivan’s agreement above. Mr. Suttonbelow. In addition, he is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 12 months from his termination date. The agreement also provides for ongoing confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations.

 

Mr. Hilbert

 

We also entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. Hilbert, effective on November 7, 2016. In that agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. Hilbert as a Senior Vice President, Sales with a starting salary of $275,000, subject to increase from time to time, and annual short-term and long-term incentive target bonuses of 40.0% and 90.0% of base salary, respectively.respectively. Under the agreement, if we terminate Mr. Hilbert’s employment without “cause” or Mr. Hilbert terminates his employment with us for “good reason” within two years on or after a “Change“change of Control”control”, he is entitled to (i) a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to his then annual base salary; (ii) COBRA coverage for up to 12 months, with Mr. Hilbert responsible for the employee portion of premiums; and (iii) a pro-rated amount equal to the annual bonus at target that would have been paid to Mr. Hilbert had he remained employed through the end of the calendar year in which his employment terminates. The terms of “cause”,


“good “good reason” and “Change“change of Control”control” are defined consistently with the same definition of those same terms described under Mr. Schneider’sSullivan’s agreement above. In addition, he is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 12 months from his termination date.

 

Mr. TraupmanSullivan

 

We also entered into an offer letter agreement with Mr. TraupmanSullivan, effective November 3, 2016.on May 30, 2017. In that agreement, we agreed to employ Mr. TraupmanSullivan as a Vice President, Systems Integration & AutomationChief Technology/Information Officer with a starting salary of $240,000,$250,000, subject to increase from time to time, and annual short-term and long-term incentive target bonuses of 40.0%60.0% and 70.0%40.0% of base salary, respectively. Under the agreement, if we terminate Mr. Traupman’sSullivan’s employment without “cause” or Mr. TraupmanSullivan terminates his employment with us for “good reason” within two years on or after a “change of control”, he is entitled to (i) a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to one and a half times his then annual base salary. In addition, he is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 12 months from his termination date.

“Cause” is defined as any of the following: (i) a plea of guilty or nolo contendre, or conviction of a felony or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude; (ii) any act of fraud or dishonesty with respect to any aspect of Company’s business including, but not limited to, falsification of Company records; (iii) failure to perform his duties (other than by reason of an illness or a disability); (iv) engagement in misconduct that is materially injurious to the Company (monetarily or otherwise); (v) breach any confidentiality, noncompetition or non-solicitation obligations to the Company; (vi) commencement of employment with an unrelated employer; (vii) material violation of any of the Company’s written policies, including but not limited to any harassment and/or non-discrimination policies; and (viii) gross negligence in the performance of his duties. The terms of “good reason” and “change of control” are defined consistently with the same definition of those same terms described under Mr. Pickett’s agreement above.

30

Ms. McDermott

Ms. McDermott has served in various leadership roles over our tax function since 2008. Pursuant to the terms of her offer letter base compensation may be increased from time to time. In her role, we award annual short-term and long-term incentive target bonuses of 40.0% and 70.0% of base salary, respectively. In the case of Ms. McDermott’s employment being terminated without cause or upon a change of control, she would participate in RigNet’s severance package that provides two weeks of base compensation for every year of service with a minimum of four weeks and a maximum of twenty-six weeks as well as one month of COBRA premiums at a maximum of $1,000 per month for every year of service up to a maximum of 6 months, paid in a lump sum payment. Ms. McDermott would also receive “change of control” benefits in connection with outstanding equity awards pursuant to the provisions within our 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended. The terms of “cause” and “change of control” are defined consistently with the same definition of those same terms described under Mr. Sullivan’s agreement below. In addition, she is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 12 months from her termination date.

2019 Changes

The Board approved changes to Messrs. Ahlstrom, Eastman and Hilbert’s severance packages to align severance benefits and define benefits not addressed in their respective offer letter agreements. Unless otherwise provided for in an offer letter or employment agreement, Messrs. Ahlstrom, Eastman and Hilbert’s separation benefits were amended such that if we terminate the employee’s employment without “cause” or the employee terminates his employment with us for “good reason” within two years on or after a “Change of Control”, he is entitled to (i) a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to his then annual base salary;twelve months of salary continuation; (ii) COBRA coverage for up to 12 months, with Mr. Traupman responsible for the employee portion of premiums; and (iii) a pro-rated amount equal to the annual bonus at target that would have been paid to Mr. Traupman had hethe employee remained employed through the end of the calendar year in which his employment terminates. The terms of “cause”, “good reason”terminates; and “Change of Control” are defined consistently with the same definition of those same terms described under Mr. Schneider’s agreement above. In addition, he is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 12 months from his termination date.

Mr. Jimmerson

As previously reported, Mr. Jimmerson was employed as our interim CEO and President from January 7, 2016 through June 1, 2016. We agreed to employ Mr. Jimmerson’s as our Interim CEO and President and reinstated and amended his prior employment agreement effective January 7, 2016 to revise his duties and to remove severance compensation, with the exception of the payment of(iii) COBRA premiumscoverage for up to 1812 months with such premiums paid to Mr. Jimmerson on a fully grossed-up after-tax basis, if necessary, for Mr. Jimmerson not to be subject to tax under Section 105 of the Internal Revenue Code. Mr. Jimmerson’s agreement set his annual base salary at $415,000 along with the potential to earn a cash performance bonus equal to 100% of his annual base salary. He also was granted equity incentive awards including a non-performance based restricted stock unit award of $300,000 which vests on May 19, 2017 and a $300,000 performance unit award with a one-year vesting period had the potential 2 times multiplier, if the Company exceeded performance targets that were unspecified at the time of the agreement. Upon separation from employment on June 1, 2016, 14,218 shares (58.2%) of the performance unit award were forfeited based on the remaining days of the performance period; the remaining shares vest and are payable in January 2017. If Mr. Jimmerson’s employment had ended prior to completion of a new permanent CEO and President being recruited, he would have forfeited the cash and restricted stock unit award performance incentives.

Mr. Jimmerson’s previous employment agreement was effective from March 14, 2012 through December 31, 2015 when he ceased to be an employee until his appointment as interim CEO and President. The 2012 agreement was amended on July 1, 2015, under which he agreed to remain employed as our Chief Financial Officer until the new Chief Financial Officer was hired and supported through transition or until December 31, 2015, and was further amended on January 7, 2016, as discussed above. In connection with him ceasing to be the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Jimmerson agreed to a cash severance amount of $1,000,000, which was deemed incentive compensation for purposes of our clawback policy. Mr. Jimmerson is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 18 months from his termination date. The agreement provides for ongoing confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations. 

Mr. Slaughter

As previously reported, Mr. Slaughter’s employment with us ended effective January 7, 2016. Prior to his departure, the Company had an agreement to employMr. Slaughter as the CEO and President until he or we decided to terminate his position for any reason. Under the agreement, pursuant to Mr. Slaughter’s termination of employment without “cause”, he received (i) any earned but unpaid base salary; (ii) any accrued but unused current year vacation up to a maximum of four weeks, plus up to the maximum unused carry-over of vacation provided in our written vacation policy then in effect (iii) all unreimbursed business expenses he incurred; (iv) a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to twice the sum of his then annual base salary and target bonusresponsible for the bonus period in which the termination occurs; (v)employee portion of such coverage. Mr. Sullivan’s severance package was changed to provide COBRA premiumscoverage for up to 1812 months with the Mr. Sullivan responsible for the employee portion of such premiums paid to Mr. Slaughter on a fully grossed-up after-tax basis, if necessary, for Mr. Slaughter not to be subject to tax under Section 105coverage. Messrs. Ahlstrom, Eastman, Hilbert and Sullivan would also receive change of the Internal Revenue Code; (vi) a pro-rated amount equalcontrol benefits in connection with outstanding equity awards pursuant to the annual bonus that would have been paid to Mr. Slaughter had he remained employed through the end of the calendar year in which his employment terminates, to be calculated based on the level of achievement ofprovisions within our financial targets under the STIP at the end of the calendar year; (vii) if applicable, an amount equal to the unpaid annual bonus for the preceding calendar year that would have been paid to Mr. Slaughter had he remained employed through the date of the bonus payments under the STIP for the prior calendar year; and (viii) outplacement services not to exceed $20,000. In connection with his departure and pursuant to his severance agreement, he also received an additional $100,000 cash separation benefit. Mr. Slaughter was not provided a gross-up payment related to any excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.


The terms of “cause”, “good reason” and “Change of Control” are defined consistently with those same terms2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as described under Mr. Pickett’s agreement above. Mr. Slaughter is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 24 months from his termination date. The agreement also provides for ongoing confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations.amended.

 

Mr. Maytorena

As previously reported, Mr. Maytorena’s employment with us ended effective November 7, 2016. Prior to his departure, we entered into an employment agreement in which we agreed to employ Mr. Maytorena as a Vice President and General Manager until he or we decided to terminate his position for any reason. Under the agreement, pursuant to Mr. Maytorena’s termination of employment without “cause”, he received a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to the sum of his then annual base salary and target bonus, thirty days’ notice pay, COBRA premiums for twelve months, and $15,000 in outplacement services. In addition, he is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 12 months from his termination date.

Mr. Hansen

As previously reported, Mr. Hansen’s employment with us ended effective July 15, 2016. Prior to his departure, we had an offer letter agreement in which we agreed to employ Mr. Hansen until he or we decided to terminate his position for any reason. Under the agreement, pursuant to Mr. Hansen’s termination of employment without “cause”, he received a lump sum cash severance in an amount equal to the sum of his then annual base salary and target bonus, and COBRA premiums for twelve months. In addition, he is subject to restrictive covenants of noncompetition and non-solicitation for a period of 24 months from his termination date.

20162018 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

 

   Estimated Future PayoutsAll Other Stock
Awards:  Number
of Securities
Underlying Stock
/Unit Awards
Option AwardsGrant Date
Fair Value of
Stock Unit and
Option Awards
(4)
   

Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards

(1) (2)

Number of Securities Underlying OptionsExercise 
Price Per
Share (3)
 Grant 
Date
 
  Threshold
TargetMaximum
Name 
Steven Pickett6/2/16  15,717 $ 177,759
 6/2/16  100,000$12.60 646,000
 6/2/16(1) 2,021 6,736 20,208 76,184
Charles Schneider3/10/16  26,000 319,280
 3/10/16  12,000 147,360
 3/10/16(1) 3,36011,200 33,600 137,536
  (2)  $34,125$227,500$568,750 —
William Sutton3/10/16  21,000 257,880
3/10/16  12,000 147,360
 3/10/16(1) 2,700 9,000 27,000 110,520
  (2)$25,545$170,300$425,750 —
Jay Hilbert11/7/16  7,500 109,125
 11/7/16  —7,500 55,950
Edward Traupman11/7/16 4,000 58,200
 11/7/16  —4,000 29,840
Martin Jimmerson3/10/16  24,430 300,000
 3/10/16(1) 7,32924,430 48,860 300,000
Mark Slaughter (5) — —
Hector Maytorena3/10/16  21,600 265,248
 3/10/16  16,000 196,480
 3/10/16(1)2,7719,235 27,705 137,536
  (2) $44,949$299,663$749,158 —
Morten Hagland Hansen3/10/16  15,800 194,024
3/10/16  10,000 122,800
 3/10/16(1) 2,023 6,743 20,229 82,730
  (2) $20,700$138,000345,000 —
          

  Estimated Future Payouts Estimated Future Payouts

All Other Stock Awards: No.

of Securities Underlying Stock /Unit Awards

 Grant Date
  Under Non-equity Incentive Plan Under Equity Incentive PlanOption AwardsFair Value of Stock Unit and Option Awards (4)
  (1) Awards (2)Number of Securities Underlying OptionsExercise 
Price Per Share (3)
 Grant 
Date
25.0%
Threshold
100.0% Target250.0% Maximum 20.0%
Threshold
100.0% Target300.0% Maximum
Name 
Steven Pickett3/7/18 - - -  - - -  13,557-- $195,899
 3/7/18 - - - 3,390 16,946 50,838 - -        - 244,870
 3/7/18 - - -  - - - -8,391 $13.50 59,912
   $123,675 $494,700 $1,236,750  - - - - - - -
Lee Ahlstrom (5)  23,205 92,820 232,050  - - - - - - -
Brad Eastman3/7/18 - - -  - - - 8,386- - 121,178
 3/7/18 - - - 2,096 10,482 31,446 - - - 151,465
 3/7/18 - - -  - - - -5,190$13.50 37,057
   37,500 150,000 375,000  - - - - - - -
Jay Hilbert3/7/18 - - -  - - -6,918- - 99,965
 3/7/18 - - - 1,7308,648 25,944 - - - 124,964
 3/7/18 - - -  - - - -4,282 $13.50 30,573
   28,050 112,200 280,500  - - - - - - -

Brendan

Sullivan

3/7/18 - - -  - - - 4,193 - - 60,589
 3/7/18 - - -  1,048 5,241 15,723 - - - 75,732
 3/7/18 - - -  - - - -2,595$13.50 18,528
   38,250 153,000 382,500  - - - --- -
Tonya
    2/1/18
(6)
 - - -  - - - 6,993- - 105,804
McDermott3/7/18 - - -  - - -3,610- - 52,165
 3/7/18 - - -  9034,513 13,539 - - - 65,213
 3/7/18 - - -  - - - -2,234$13.50 15,951
   18,450 73,800 184,500  - - - - - - -   
                
(1)The threshold, targetSTIP provides incentive compensation based on achievement of Management EBITDA and maximum percentages relatedConsolidated Revenue financial metrics, subject to PU awards are 30.0%, 100.0%plan limitations, as discussed above under see “Determining the Amount of Each Element of Compensation for 2018 − Short-term Incentive Compensation” and 300.0%, respectively. is to be paid in stock for our NEOs in 2018.

(2)For a discussion of the performance stock unit thresholds and measurement criteria see “Determining the Amount of Each Element of Compensation for 20162018 – Long-Term Incentive Compensation “Compensation“ above. These awards generally vest each annualupon completion of the three-year performance period, or sooner if an individual’s employment ceases due to retirement, death, disability or change of control, and are payable on July 1 2019.

(2)The threshold, target and maximum percentages related to 2016 STIP compensation are 90.0%, 100.0% and 250.0%, respectively. The STIP provides incentive compensation based on achievementst following the end of Adjusted EBITDA and Revenue financial metrics, subject to plan limitations, as discussed above under see “Determining the Amount of Each Element of Compensation for 2016 − Short-term Incentive Compensation” and is payable in stock for our NEOs. Due to the STIP threshold metrics not being achieved, there were no STIP payouts in 2016.performance period.

 

(3)For a discussion of our methodology in determining the fair value of our common stock see Note 10, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

 31
31


(4)Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value for restricted stockequity awards granted in 20162018 computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Assumptions used in the determination of these amounts which represent grant date fair value are included in Note 10, Stock-Based Compensation, to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.

 

(5)Mr. SlaughterAhlstrom was granted no stock awards in 2018. Mr. Ahlstrom’s STIP awards were determined based on base salary earned during 2016.his 2018 employment period.

On March 15, 2017, the Committee recommended and the Board approved RSU and PU awards to our NEOs, as part of our normal annual review of equity awards to incentivize our executives for the long-term success of our Company and to provide critical retention incentives.

 

Name

 Number of Securities
Underlying Unit Awards (1)
 Long-term Performance
Awards (2)
Steven Pickett12,404 12,404
Charles Schneider11,637 11,637
William Sutton9,381 9,381
Jay Hilbert6,330 6,330
Edward Traupman4,297 4,297

 

(1)(6)TheMs. McDermott served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer from February 21, 2018 through August 19, 2018 and was awarded a restricted stock unit awards vest equally over four years beginning March 19 2018.
(2)This represents unitsaward on February 21, 2018 to be awardedprovide compensation for the achievement of target performance thresholds over a three-year periodher additional workload and vest on July 1, 2020, with a potential for a three times performance multiplier.responsibility.

 

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 20162018

 

 Option Awards Stock and Unit Awards
 Number of        Incentive Unit Awards
NameSecurities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options -
Exercisable
(1)
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options -
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Securities

that have
not Vested
(1)
Market
Value of
Securities
that have not
Vested
(2)
Number of Securities
that have
not
Vested (3)
Market
Value of
Securities
that have
not Vested
(2)
Steven Pickett100,000(4) $ 12.605/27/26  15,717(4) $ 363,849 6,736 $ 155,938
Charles Schneider 20,850(5)  22.0912/8/25  4,481(5)  103,735 11,200  259,280
  — —  —  26,000(6)  601,900 — —
  — —  —  12,000(7)  277,800 — —
William Sutton 5,700 —(8)  9.641/1/18  1,273(12)    29,470 9,000 208,350
  5,750 —(10)  8.481/1/20  1,113(14)    25,766 — —
  22,696 —(11)  18.003/22/21  1,740(16)    40,281 —
  24,978 —(12)  17.083/7/22  768(17)    17,779 —
  17,352 5,785(13)  19.963/6/23  21,000(6)  486,150 —
  4,931 4,932(15)  47.173/5/24  12,000(7)  277,800 —
  3,078 9,236(17)  33.203/4/25  —  — —
  1,359 4,079(18)  33.2011/3/25  —  — —
Jay Hilbert — 7,500(19)  14.5511/7/26  7,500(19)    173,625 —
Edward Traupman4,000(19)14.5511/7/65  4,000 (19)    92,600
Martin Jimmerson  24,430 (20)  565,555 —
   10,212 (21)  236,408 —
Mark Slaughter  
Hector Maytorena 6,250 —(22)  11.0011/5/17 —  —  —
  6,250 —(8)  9.641/1/18 —  —  —
  6,250 —(9)  5.321/1/19 —  —  —
  6,250 —(10)  8.481/1/20 —  —  —
  12,604 —(11)  18.003/22/21 —  —  —
  13,685 —(12)  17.083/7/22 —  —  —
  10,244 —(13)  19.963/6/23 —  —  —
  2,902(15)  47.173/5/24 —  —  —
  2,467 —(17)  33.203/4/25 —  —  —
  1,057 —(18)  33.2011/3/25 —  —  —
Morten Hagland Hansen                  —  907 (20)20,997
            

Name

Option Awards Stock and Unit Awards
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options -

Exercisable
(1)
Number of
Securities
Underlying Unexercised

Options -
Unexercisable
Option
Exercise
Price
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of Securities
that have not Vested (1)
Market Value of Securities that have not Vested (2)Incentive Unit Awards

Number of Securities
that have not Vested (3)

Market
Value of
Securities
that have
not Vested
(2)
Steven Pickett 50,00050,000(4) $ 12.605/27/26 7,859(4) $  99,3383,974  $ 50,231
 -8,391(6) $ 13.503/7/25  9,303(5)117,59010,990   138,914
        13,557(6)  171,36016,946   214,197
Lee Ahlstrom-- -  - -- -
Brad Eastman-5,190(6)  13.503/7/25 8,386(6)    105,99910,482 132,492
Jay Hilbert 3,7503,750(7)  14.5511/7/26 3,750(7)    47,400- -
       4,748(5)    60,0155,608 70,855
 -4,282(6)  13.503/7/25 6,918(6)87,4448,648 109,311
Brendan Sullivan-2,595(6)  13.503/7/25 4,193(6)53,0005,241 66,246
Tonya McDermott 2,308 -(8)  47.173/5/24  475(9)6,004-  -
   3,2371,079(9)  33.203/4/25  2,418(5)    30,564 2,855  36,087
  -2,234(6)  13.503/7/25 3,610(6)45,630 4,513 57,044
        5,150(10)65,096   
        4,000(11)50,560   
        6,993(12)88,392   
               
(1)The option and stock awards reflected in the table above generally vest as to one-fourth of the total number of shares on the first, second, third and fourth year anniversary of the date of award or first vesting date specified in the award agreement, except for the awards noted in (7) and (20) below which vest in full on a specific future date and (21)(3) which vestsvest based on achievement of performance measures over three years.
(2)Based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 20162018 of $23.15.$12.64.

 32

(3)Incentive unit awards represent the target units to be awarded for the achievement of target performance thresholds over a three-year period, generally vestare earned each annual performance period, and are payable on July 1st following the final performance period or sooner if an individual’s employment ceases due to retirement, death, disability or change of control, and are payable on July 1, 2019, withcontrol. Awards have a potential for a three times performance multiplier.  payout.
(4)The date of the award was June 2, 2016, with the initial one-fourth vesting on May 31, 2017 and one-fourth annually thereafter.
(5)The date of the award was December 5, 2015,March 15, 2017, with the initial one-fourth vesting on May 15, 2017March 19, 2018 and one-fourth annually thereafter.
(6)The date of the award was March 10, 2016,7, 2018, with the initial one-fourth vesting on March 19, 20177, 2019 and one-fourth annually thereafter.
(7)The date of the award was March 10,November 7, 2016, with the full vesting on March 19, 2019.
(8)The date of the award was January 1, 2008.
(9)The date of the award was January 1, 2009.

(10) The date of the award was January 1, 2010. 

(11)The date of the award was March 22, 2011.
(12)The date of the award was March 7, 2012.
(13)The date of the award was March 6, 2013.
(14)The date of the award was March 6, 2013, with the initial one-fourth vesting on May 1, 2014November 7, 2017 and one-fourth annually thereafter.
(15)(8)The date of the award was March 5, 2014.
(16)The date of the award was March 5, 2014, with the initial one-fourth vesting on May 15, 2016 and one-fourth annually thereafter.
(17)(9)The date of the award was March 4, 2015, with the initial one-fourth vesting on May 15, 2016 and one-fourth annually thereafter.
(18)The date of the award was November 3, 2015, with the initial one-fourth vesting on May 15, 2016 and one-fourth annually thereafter.
(19)The date of the award was November 7, 2016, with full vesting on November 7, 2020.
(20)(10)The date of the award was March 10, 2016, with fullthe initial one-fourth vesting on May 15,March 19, 2017.
(21)(11)The date of the award was March 10, 2016, with performance measures; these shares were earned due to employment ending for other than cause and vested in January 2017.the full vesting on March 19, 2019.
(22)(12)The date of the award was November 5, 2007.February 21, 2018 with one-half vesting on February 21, 2019 and the remainder on February 21, 2020.

 

OPTION EXERCISES AND VESTING OF RESTRICTED STOCK

 

The following table contains information about the exercise of stock options by, and vesting of restricted stock for our NEOs during 2016.2018, which includes the vesting of restricted stock issued related to the 2017 STIP.

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
Value Realized on
Exercise (1)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
Value Realized on
Vesting (2)
Steven Pickett 
Charles Schneider —  —
William Sutton — — 4,110
Jay Hilbert — — 
Edward Traupman — 
Martin Jimmerson57,875$ 299,191  —
Mark Slaughter135,125 608,218  — —
Hector Maytorena — — 2,532 $ 35,968
Morten Hagland Hansen9,485   57,553 2,848  41,070
      
  Option Awards Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
Value Realized
on Exercise (1)
 Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
Value Realized on
Vesting (2)
Steven Pickett-$             - 35,460$    494,849
Lee Ahlstrom - - --
Brad Eastman - - --
Jay Hilbert -- 8,434120,296
Brendan Sullivan -- 5,80974,936
Tonya McDermott8,32628,297 9,754127,400

32

(1)Value realized on exercise represents the difference between the sales price obtained on the sale of shares and the exercise price per share, multiplied by the number of shares sold in each exercise transaction.

(2)Value represents the closing price per share of our stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the gross number of shares vested.

 

PENSION BENEFITS

 

We do not provide pension benefits for our NEOs or other employees. Retirement benefits are provided through the Savings Plan discussed below.

 

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

We do not have a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. As such, no compensation has been deferred by our NEOs or our other employees. The Savings PlanOur 401(k) plan is a 401(k) deferred compensation arrangement andthat is a qualified plan under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) (“The Savings Plan”). During 2018, we reestablished a company-match within our 401(k) plan at a maximum of 4.0% provided the employee contributes at least 5% of their cash compensation.

 

 33

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL

 

Payments Made Upon Termination

 

Regardless of the manner in which an executive officer’s employment terminates, the executive will be entitled to receive amounts earned (but unpaid) during his term of employment. Such amounts include:

 

earned, but unpaid base salary;
target non-equity incentive compensation earned during the fiscal year;
unpaid non-equity compensation for the preceding year;
unused vacation pay; and
amounts contributed and vested through our Savings Plan.401(k) plan (including any Company matching contributions).

 

If provided for in the executive’s employment agreement and their separation is the result of death or “Disability”,disability, the executive or his or her estate shall receive the above benefits, any long-term disability benefits and certain unvested equity awards shall immediately vest and become exercisable.

 

The employment agreements with each of our executives also provide certain benefits if their employment is terminated under various circumstances. See above under “Employment Agreements” for a description of those circumstances and the benefits to which the NEOs are entitled. Employees who do not have employment terms to the contrary participate in RigNet’s severance package that provides two weeks of base compensation for every year of service with a minimum of four weeks and a maximum of twenty-six weeks as well as one month of COBRA premiums at a maximum of $1,000 per month for every year of service up to a maximum of 6 months, paid in a lump sum payment with separation pay.

 

Excise Taxes

 

For all NEOs if any benefits payable or otherwise provided under each named executive officer’s employment agreement would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code (the “Excise Tax”), we will not pay or otherwise reimburse the executive for such Excise Tax and any related taxes, fees or penalties thereon.

 

Quantification of Payments on Termination

 

The chart below reflects the amount of compensation payable to each of our NEOs in the event of termination of such executive’s employment pursuant to his employment agreement and our stock compensation plans. The amount of compensation payable to each executive officer upon voluntary termination with “Good Reason,” involuntary termination other than for “Cause,” termination following a “Change of Control” and the occurrence of the “Disability” or death of the executive is shown below. The amounts shown are calculated assuming that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2016,2018, and thus include amounts earned through such time (other than amounts payable pursuant to our Savings Plan)401(k) plan) and are estimates of the amounts, which would be paid out to the executives upon their termination. The actual amounts to be paid out may only be determined at the time of the executive’s actual separation from us.

 

During 2019, the Board approved changes to NEO severance benefits as discussed above under “2019 Changes - Employment Agreements.

 34
33


Post EmploymentPost-Employment Compensation Table

 

NameSeverance
Payment
Early Vesting
of Equity
Awards (1)
 Health &
Welfare
Benefits (2)
 Total Benefit
Steven Pickett    
 Change of Control$ 1,940,000$ 1,465,630$ 40,232$ 3,445,862
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3) 1,940,0001,465,630 40,2323,445,862
 Disability or Death1,465,6301,465,630
Charles Schneider    
 Change of Control 489,8951,264,81633,4881,788,199
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3) 489,8951,264,816 33,4881,788,199
 Disability or Death2,3951,264,8161,267,211
William Sutton    
 Change of Control 448,927895,700 33,4881,378,115
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3)448,92762,50533,488 544,920
 Disability or Death 16,627895,700912,327
Jay Hilbert    
 Change of Control 275,00018,298293,298
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3) 275,000 18,298293,298
 Disability or Death
Edward Traupman    
 Change of Control 240,000 18,298258,298
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3)240,00018,298 258,298
 Disability or Death
Martin Jimmerson    
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (4)18,35620,232 38,588
Mark Slaughter    
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (4) 1,805,126 34,018 1,839,144
Hector Maytorena    
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (4) 499,997 45,349 545,356
Morten Hagland Hansen    
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (4) 242,999 18,298 261,297
      
NameSeverance
Payment
Early
Vesting of
Equity
Awards (1)
 Health &
Welfare
Benefits (2)
Total
Benefit
Steven Pickett    
 Change of Control$ 2,026,367$ 437,372$ 80,921$ 2,544,660
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3) 2,026,36749,084 80,9212,156,372
 Disability or Death47,567390,288 -437,855
Lee Ahlstrom    
 Change of Control32,139-- 32,139
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3)32,139-- 32,139
 Disability or Death5,216--5,216
Brad Eastman    
 Change of Control 313,846 16,027 1,000330,873
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3) 313.84616,027 1,000330,873
 Disability or Death13,846- -13,846
Jay Hilbert    
 Change of Control 279,51920,1102,000300,629
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3) 279,51920,110 2,000300.629
 Disability or Death24,519- -24,519
Brendan Sullivan    
 Change of Control442,3278,0141,000451,341
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3)442,3278,0141,000 451,341
 Disability or Death21,577--21,577
Tonya McDermott    
 Change of Control 87,99210,4036,000104,395
 Other than Cause or for Good Reason (3)87,99210,4036,000 104,395
 Disability or Death17,031- -17,031
(1)See the table of Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 20162018 presented earlier in this section of this proxy statement.
(2)This column includes any applicable Cobra premiums paid for the executive and agreed upon outplacement services.
(3)Termination assumes there has not been a change of control event within the prior two years.
(4)Messrs. Jimmerson, Slaughter, Maytorena and Hansen had their employment terminated during 2016 for other than cause. These amounts were the severance payments and benefits received under their respective employment agreements, which are described above under “Employment Agreements”.

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this proxy statement with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

 

 Submitted By:
  
 Compensation Committee
  
 Keith Olsen, Chairman

James H. Browning

Ditlef de Vibe
Kevin O’Hara
Ditlef de Vibe

 

This Report of the Compensation Committee is not “soliciting material” and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this proxy statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this report by reference, and shall not otherwise be deemed filed under such Acts.


34

SECURITY OWNERSHIP

 

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth as of March 6, 2017,14, 2019, the number of shares beneficially owned by: (i) each person who is known to us to beneficially own more than 5.0% of a class of shares;the Company’s common stock; (ii) the current directors and nominees of our Board; (iii) each named executive officer included in the Summary Compensation Table; and (iv) all current directors and executive officers as a group. As noted in the footnotes to the table below, we obtained certain information in the table from filings made with the SEC. Unless otherwise noted in the footnotes to the table below, to our knowledge each beneficial owner has sole voting power and sole investment power, subject to community property laws for individuals that may apply to create shared voting and investment power. Unless indicated in the footnotes below, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o RigNet, Inc., 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77084-4947.

 

Except as otherwise noted in the table below, we calculated the percentage of shares outstanding based on 18,029,01319,471,316 shares of common stock outstanding on March 6, 2017.14, 2019. In accordance with SEC regulations, we also include (i) shares subject to options that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of March 6, 2017,14, 2019, and ii)(ii) shares issuable upon settlement of restricted stock units that are vested, or will become vested within 60 days of March 6, 2017.14, 2019. Those shares are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding such option or restricted stock unit for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.


Security Ownership Table

 

Directors / NomineesStock Total%     Named Executive OfficersStock Total%
James H. Browning 18,973 Ŧ 18,973* Steven Pickett   — Λ —*
Mattia Caprioli — Ŧ* Charles Schneider (1)— Λ 4,481*
Charles L. Davis 38,906 Ŧ 38,906* William Sutton (2)13,412 Λ 104,150*
Ditlef de Vibe10,763 Ŧ 10,763* Jay Hilbert     — Λ —*
Kevin Mulloy   52 Λ52* Edward Traupman       1,000 Λ 1,000*
Kevin O’Hara   15,973 Λ15,973* Martin Jimmerson (3)   34,642    34,642*
Keith Olsen   8,732 Ŧ8,732* Mark Slaughter (3)166,752    167,002*
Brent K. Whittington 21,373 Ŧ21,373* Hector Maytorena (3)    7,528    7,528*
     Hagland Morten Hansen (3)      21,978   21,978        *
         
5% Beneficial OwnersStock Total%         
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co (5)4,750,0004,750,00026.3%     
Arrowpoint Asset Management (6) 2,802,2282,802,22815.5% All Current Directors and   
FMR LLC (7)2,145,1322,145,13211.9% Officers as a group (13 persons)129,184   224,4031.2%


Directors / Nominees
 Stock Total   % All Executive Officers    Stock     Total   % 
James H. Browning (1) 31,428 Ŧ 38,055* Steven Pickett (2)     27,904 Λ  115,099
Mattia Caprioli - Ŧ -* Lee Ahlstrom (3)- Λ 6,639
Ditlef de Vibe (1)23,218 Ŧ29,845* Brad Eastman (4)3,368 Λ16,805
Kevin Mulloy (1)   6,177 Λ 12,804* Jay Hilbert (5)8,004 Λ20,447
Kevin O’Hara (1)   39,913 Ŧ46,540* Brendan Sullivan (6)1,146 Λ12,731
Keith Olsen (1)18,487 Ŧ25,114* James Barnett, Jr.     1,481 Λ      1,481
Gail P. Smith (1)1,790 Λ8,417* Edward Traupman (7)     8,484 Λ19,845
Brent K. Whittington (1) 33,828 Ŧ40,455* Tonya McDermott (8)     14,396 Λ      36,784
         
5% Beneficial Owners   Stock Total   % All Directors and Executives    Stock      Total     % 
Digital Oilfield Investments LP (9)   5,000,2545,000,25425.8% As a group (16 persons)  219,627431,0612.4% 
FMR LLC (10)2,911,6792,911,67915.0% Ŧ  Meets or exceeds executive equity ownership requirements
ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC (11)  2,530,6822,530,68213.0% Λ  Within transition period for equity ownership requirements

        
*Less than 1.0% of class1%
ŦMeets(1)Includes 6,627 restricted stock units, which are exercisable or exceeds executive equity ownership requirementsvest within 60 days of March 14, 2019.
ΛWithin transition period for equity ownership requirements

(1)Includes 4,481 shares of restricted stock.

(2)Includes 85,84447,248 shares issued March 20, 2018 for the 2018 STIP payout, less 18,640 shares withheld for taxes; 52,097 shares of stock subject to options and 6,490 restricted stock units, which are exercisable or will vest within 60 days of March 6, 2017,14, 2019.
(3)Includes 11,301 shares issued March 20, 2018 for the 2018 STIP payout, less 4,662 shares withheld for taxes.
(4)Includes 13,594 shares issued March 20, 2018 for the 2018 STIP payout, less 3,550 shares withheld for taxes; 1,297 shares of stock subject to options and 4,8942,096 restricted stock units, which are exercisable or vest within 60 days of March 14, 2019.
(5)Includes 6,124 shares issued March 20, 2018 for the 2018 STIP payout, less 1,813 shares withheld for taxes; 4,820 shares of stock subject to options and 3,312 restricted stock units, which are exercisable or vest within 60 days of March 14, 2019.
(6)Includes 13,446 shares issued March 20, 2018 for the 2018 STIP payout, less 3,558 shares withheld for taxes; 649 shares of stock subject to options and 1,048 restricted stock units, which are exercisable or vest within 60 days of March 14, 2019.
(7)Includes 8,874 shares issued March 20, 2018 for the 2018 STIP payout, less 2,487 shares withheld for taxes; 2,726 shares of stock subject to options and 2,248 restricted stock units, which are exercisable, or vest within 60 days of March 14, 2019.
(8)Includes 6,889 shares issued March 20, 2018 for the 2018 STIP payout, less 2,858 shares withheld for taxes; 6,103 shares of stock subject to options, 475 shares of restricted stock.stock and 11,779 restricted stock units, which are exercisable or vest within 60 days of March 14, 2019.

35

(3)Represents our latest available data, which does not reflect ownership transactions subsequent to his separation of employment as no additional information has been voluntarily reported to us. Mr. Slaughter’s ownership also includes 125 shares of stock owned by Kristen Slaughter, who is Mr. Slaughter’s daughter, and 125 shares of stock owned by Leslie Slaughter, who is Mr. Slaughter’s daughter. Mr. Slaughter disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Kristen Slaughter and Leslie Slaughter.

(4)(9)Based on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13DForm 4 filed with the SEC on September 26, 2013,August 31, 2018, the 4,750,0005,000,254 shares of Common Stock are held directly by Digital Oilfield Investments LP.,LP, a wholly owned subsidiary of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. As disclosed, each of Digital Oilfield Investments GP Limited, KKR European Fund III Limited Partnership, KKR Associates Europe III Limited Partnership, KKR Europe III Limited, KKR Fund Holdings L.P., KKR Group Holdings Corp., KKR Fund Holdings GP Limited, KKR Group Holdings L.P., KKR Group Holdings GP Limited, KKR & Co. L.P., KKR Management LLC, KKR & Co, Inc., Henry R. Kravis and George R. Roberts hashave voting and dispositive power over all the securities held directly by Digital Investments LP and may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of the securities held directly by Digital Oilfield Investments LP, and each disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities. The address of each such beneficial owner (except Mr. Roberts) is c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L. P., 9 West 57th57th Street, Suite 4200, New York, NY 10019. The address of Mr. Roberts is c/o Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P.L. P., 2800 Sand Hill Road, Suite 200, Menlo Park, CA 94025.

(5)(10)Based on Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017, Arrowpoint Asset Management,2019, FMR LLC reported that they have sole dispositive and voting power as to all such shares. The Schedule 13G also reported that Meridian Growth Fund is the beneficial owner of 786,525 shares, which per the Schedule 13G constitutes 4.4% of the common stock. We have assumed that these 786,525 shares over which Meridian has voting power are included in the 2,802,228 shares over which Arrowpoint Asset Management has voting power; however, the 13G is unclear on this point and is unclear as to the relationship between Arrowpoint Asset Management and Meridian. The address for each such beneficial owner is 100 Fillmore Street, Suite 325, Denver, Colorado 80206.

(6)Based on Amendment No. 1 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2017, FMR LLC. (“FMR”) reported that it, Abigail P. Johnson and Select Energy Service Portfolio reported that theymembers of the Johnson family have sole dispositivevoting power over 99,900 shares, shared power to vote and votingdispose of none of the shares, and sole dispositive power as to 2,145,1322,911,679 shares. Abigail P. Johnson is a director, the Chairman, and the Chief Executive Officer of FMR. Members of the Johnson family, including Abigail P. Johnson, directly or through trusts represent 49.0% of the voting power of FMR, and have entered into a voting agreement with other shareholders forming a controlling group with respect to FMR, LLC. The Schedule 13G further states neither FMR nor Abigail P. Johnson has the sole power to vote or direct the voting of the shares owned directly by the various investment companies registered under or advised by Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR Co), a wholly owned subsidiary of FMR. The address for each such beneficial owner is 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.
(11)Based on Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019, ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC, formerly Asset Management, LLC reported that it has sole dispositive and voting power as to all such shares. The address for ArrowMark Colorado Holdings LLC is 100 Fillmore Street, Suite 325, Denver, Colorado 80206.

 

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our NEOs and directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership concerning our common stock with the SEC and to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon our review of the Section 16(a) filings that have been received by us and representations made to us by our executive officers and directors, we believe that all filings required to be made under Section 16(a) during 20162018 were made timely except for reporting a share awardone transaction for Mr. JimmersonWhittington which was filed twoeleven days late; share awardslate, one transaction for Ms. McDermott which was filed 160 days late, one transaction each for Messrs. Schneider, Sutton, Maytorena,Pickett, Hilbert, Sullivan, Traupman, and Hansen eachCarter which was filed 164 days late and one additional transaction for Mr. Carter which was filed one day late; and two share transactions for Mr. Davis, one filed two hundred twenty days and one filed nine days late.

 

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

 

The table below sets forth the following information as of the end of December 31, 20162018 for (i) all compensation plans previously approved by our stockholders and (ii) all compensation plans not previously approved by our stockholders.

 

Plan categoryNumber of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options
(a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
such outstanding
options
 Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans (excluding
securities reflected in column (a) (1))
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options (a)
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options
 Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans (excluding
securities reflected in column (a) (1)
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
498,694  $ 20.77 2,600,159323,981  $ 20.41 2,175,468
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
   —   —-   -   -
 
Total 498,694  $ 20.77 2,600,159 323,981  $ 20.41 2,175,468
      
(1)Represents shares available under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended. No additional shares will be awarded under the RigNet, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan or the RigNet Inc. 2001 Performance Stock Option Plan.

 

In addition to our 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan, we maintain the RigNet, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and the RigNet Inc. 2001 Performance Stock Option Plan, both of which werewas approved by our stockholders in connection with their adoption prior to our IPO.stockholders. We do not maintain any equity compensation plans that have not been approved by our stockholders.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P.

 

A vendor who provides dedicated consultingThe Company has a reseller arrangement with Darktrace, which is an artificial intelligence company in cybersecurity that is partially owned by KKR, a significant stockholder of the Company. Under the arrangement, the Company will sell Darktrace’s cybersecurity audit services to KKR and its affiliated funds’ portfolio companies, was used by RigNet for business consulting serviceswith the Company’s cybersecurity offerings.  In the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company purchased $0.1 million from Darktrace in the ordinary course of business totaling zero, $0.3 millionbusiness.

36

Vissim AS

Vissim AS has participated in a competitive request for quote from RigNet in the ordinary course of business. Vissim AS is 24% owned by AVANT Venture Capital AS. AVANT Venture Capital is owned by and $0.5 million duringhas as its chairman of its board one of our board members. Although no amounts were spent with Vissim AS in the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Neither KKR, a significant stockholder of RigNet, nor any entity affiliated2018, in the future the Company may spend money with KKR own any equity in this potential vendor.

 

Review and Approval of Related Party Transactions

 

Under our Policy Governing Related Person Transactions, our employees, officers and directors are discouraged from entering into any transaction that may cause a conflict of interest for us. In addition, they must report any potential conflict of interest, including related party transactions, to their managers or our general counsel, who then reviews and summarizes the proposed transaction for our Audit Committee. Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee must then approve any related-party transactions, including those transactions involving our directors. In approving or rejecting such proposed transactions, the


Audit Committee considers the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to theAudit Committee, including the material terms of the transactions, risks, benefits, costs, availability of other comparable services or products and, if applicable, the impact on a director’s independence. Our Audit Committee will determine whether to approve only those transactions that, in light of known circumstances, are in, or are not inconsistent with, our best interests, as our Audit Committee determines in the good faith exercise of its discretion. A copy of our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct and Ethics and Audit Committee charter may be found at our corporate websitehttp://investor.rig.net/corporate-governance.cfm”.code-ethics-and-business-conduct-2.


37


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 20182020 Annual Meeting

 

Any stockholder who intends to present a proposal for inclusion in our 20182020 proxy statement and form of proxy must submit the proposal, in writing, so that our Corporate Secretary receives it at our principal executive offices, located at 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77084-4947, by December 4, 2017,10, 2019, which is 120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the date this proxy statement is being sent to our stockholders. Any stockholder who wishes to bring a proposal or nominate a person for election to our Board at the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must provide written notice of the proposal or nomination to our Corporate Secretary, at our principal executive offices, between January 3, 20189, 2020 and February 2, 2018,7, 2020, which is 90 to 120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the upcoming annual meeting. In addition, our stockholders must comply with the requirements of the SEC related to nominations and stockholder proposals and the procedural requirements in our bylaws, which stockholders can obtain from us upon request and which are also on file with the SEC or available on our website at “http:http://investor.rig.net/corporate-governance.cfm”.amended-and-restated-bylaws-0.

 

Our bylawsBylaws provide that if a stockholder wishes to nominate a person for election as director (which is separate from simply recommending someone to be considered by our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for inclusion on the Company’s slate of directors) or to propose other business to be considered at one of our annual meetings of stockholders, that stockholder must follow the procedures contained in our bylaws and satisfy the requirements of Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Act. The stockholder proposing such business or making such nomination must be a stockholder of record of our Company on the date the nomination is delivered to our Corporate Secretary and at the time of our annual meeting and be entitled to vote at the annual meeting. The proposal or nomination must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not less than the close of business on the 90th day nor earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, except that if the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder must be delivered not earlier than the close of business 120 days prior to the annual meeting and no later than 90 days prior to such annual meeting or 10 days following our first public announcement of the date of the annual meeting. In addition, if the number of directors to be elected to our Board at an annual meeting is increased and there is no public announcement by us naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the increased Board at least 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a stockholder’s nomination shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is delivered to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which we first make such public announcement. These time periods are designed to allow us time to adequately consider all proposals and nominees.

 

To be considered, each nomination must include the following information:

 

all information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to and in accordance with Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder;

 

the nominee’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected;

 

a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships, between or among the nominating stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, and their respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert with them, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee, and his or her respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert with him, on the other hand, including, all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 promulgated under Regulation S-K if the stockholder making the nomination and any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made, if any, or any of their respective affiliates or associates or persons acting in concert with any such person, were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the nominee were a director or executive officer of such registrant;

 

a written questionnaire with respect to the background and qualification of the nominee and the background of any other person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, the form of which questionnaire will be provided by our Corporate Secretary upon written request; and

 

a written representation and agreement, in the form provided by our Corporate Secretary upon written request, that the nominee is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance to, any person or entity as to how the nominee, if elected as a director, will act

or vote on any issue or question that has not been disclosed to us or that could limit or interfere with the nominee’s ability to comply, if elected as a director, with the nominee’s fiduciary duties under applicable law, is not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement or understanding with any person or entity other than us with respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement or indemnification in connection with service or action as our director that has not been disclosed to us, and in the nominee’s individual capacity and on behalf of any person or entity on whose behalf the nomination is being made, would be in compliance, if elected as our director, and will comply with all of our applicable publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality and stock trading policies and guidelines.

38

The proposing stockholder must also include such other information as we may reasonably require or that is otherwise reasonably necessary to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a director of the Company, to determine whether such nominee qualifies as an “independent director” or “audit committee financial expert” under applicable law, securities exchange rule or regulation, or any of our publicly-disclosed corporate governance guidelines or committee charters; including our Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations, and that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence and qualifications, or lack thereof, of such nominee

 

To be considered, proposals for business to be considered by our stockholders at an annual meeting, other than the nomination of persons for election as directors, must include the following information:

 

a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting;

 

the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting;

 

the text of the proposal or business, including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend our Bylaws, the language of the proposed amendment;

 

any material interest in such business of such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made;

 

a description of all agreements, arrangements and understandings between such stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, and any other person or persons, including their names, in connection with the proposal of such business by such stockholder; and

 

as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made:

 

¾the name and address of such stockholder, as they appear on our books, and of such beneficial owner, if any,

 

¾the class or series and number of shares of our capital stock that are, directly or indirectly, owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder and by such beneficial owner,

 

¾any option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class or series of our capital stock, whether or not such instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in the underlying class or series of our capital or otherwise directly or indirectly owned beneficially by such stockholder and by such beneficial owner, if any,

 

¾any other direct or indirect opportunity held or owned beneficially by such stockholder and by such beneficial owner, if any, to profit or share in any profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of our shares,

 

¾any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship pursuant to which such stockholder or beneficial owner, if any, has a right to vote any shares of any of our securities,

 

¾any short interest in any of our securities,

 

¾any right to dividends on our shares of capital stock owned beneficially by such stockholder or such beneficial owner, if any, which right is separated or separable from the underlying shares,

 

¾any proportionate interest in shares of our capital stock or derivative instrument held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such stockholder or such beneficial owner, if any, is a general partner or with respect to which such stockholder or such beneficial owner, if any, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner, and

 

¾any performance-related fees, other than an asset-based fee, to which such stockholder or such beneficial owner, if any, is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of our shares or derivative instruments, if any, in each case with respect to the information required to be included in the notice.

 

Such information must include any such interests held by members of such stockholder’s or such beneficial owner’s immediate family sharing the same household. All such information must be supplemented by such stockholder and such beneficial owner, if any, not later than 10 days after the record date for the Annual Meeting to disclose such ownership as of the record date, 10 days before the Annual Meeting date, and immediately prior to the commencement of the Annual Meeting, by delivery of such supplemented information to our Corporate Secretary. Such information shall also include any other information relating to such stockholder and beneficial owner, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitation of proxies for election of directors in a contested


election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of our stock entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such business or nomination, and a representation whether the stockholder or the beneficial owner, if any, intends or is part of a group that intends to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of our outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt the proposal or elect the nominee or otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of such proposal or nomination.

 

39

The proposing stockholder must also include such other information as we may reasonably require or that is otherwise reasonably necessary to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a director of our Company, to determine whether such nominee qualifies as an “independent director” or “audit committee financial expert” under applicable law, securities exchange rule or regulation, or any of our publicly-disclosed corporate governance guidelines or committee charters; including our Policy Governing Director Qualifications and Nominations, and that could be material to a reasonable stockholder’s understanding of the independence and qualifications, or lack thereof, of such nominee.

Where You May Find More Information About Us

 

We file annual, quarterly and current reports and proxy statements with the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov”www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy any document that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room and its copy charges. We maintain a website at “http:http://investor.rig.net/sec.cfm”financial-information/sec-filings, where we post our SEC filings. All references to websites included herein are inactive textual references and nothing contained on any such websites shall be deemed incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.

 

You may request copies of our filings, including any documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement as described below, without charge, by calling our Investor Relations representative at (281) 674-0100 or write to Investor Relations, 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77084-4947.

 

If you would like to request documents from us, please do so at least five business days before the date of the Annual Meeting in order to receive timely delivery of the documents before the Annual Meeting. If you request any incorporated documents from us, we will mail them to you by first class mail or other equally prompt means within one business day of receipt of your request, provided that we will not mail any exhibits to the information that is incorporated by reference unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into the information that this proxy statement incorporates.

 

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

 

The information contained in this document or any document incorporated by reference herein speaks only as of the date indicated on the cover of this document or the document incorporated by reference unless the information specifically indicates that another date applies.

 

Householding

SEC rules allow us, subject to certain conditions, to send only one proxy statement and annual report or notice to two or more shareholders who share the same last name and address. This “householding” rule provides greater convenience for our shareholders and cost savings for us by reducing the number of duplicate documents that households receive. Also, this allows us to be more environmentally friendly by reducing the unnecessary use of materials. Please note that each shareholder will continue to receive a separate proxy card, which will allow each individual to vote independently. If you wish to receive an additional copy of our annual report or proxy statement this year, you may obtain one by calling RigNet Investor Relations at 281-674-0100 or by writing to our Corporate Secretary at RigNet, Inc., 15115 Park Row Boulevard, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77084-4947.

Shareholders who wish to revoke consent to householding so each shareholder at their address can receive an individual copy of our proxy statement and annual report in the future may call Broadridge Investor Communication Services toll free at 1-866-540-7095 or write to Broadridge Investor Communication Services, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way Edgewood, New York 11717.

OTHER MATTERS FOR 20172019 ANNUAL MEETING

 

As of the date of this proxy statement, our Board knows of no matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals included in the accompanying notice and described in this proxy statement. If any other matter requiring a vote of stockholders arises, including a question of adjourning the Annual Meeting, the persons named as proxies in the accompanying proxy card will have the discretion to vote thereon according to their best judgment of what they consider to be in the best interests of our Company. The accompanying proxy card confers discretionary authority to take action with respect to any additional matters that may come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.


40

PROPOSALS

 

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Members of our Board are elected each year at the annual meeting of stockholders. AllEach of our current Board members havehas been nominated to stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, consisting solely of independent directors, as determined by our Board recommended the directors for nomination by our full Board. Based on that recommendation, our Board has nominated nine directors for election at the Annual Meeting.

 

Nominees

 

The following nine directors have all been nominated to serve on our Board until the 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders: James H. Browning, Mattia Caprioli, Charles L. Davis, Ditlef de Vibe, Kevin Mulloy, Kevin J. O’Hara, Keith Olsen, Steven E. Pickett, Gail P. Smith and Brent K. Whittington. Each of the nominees has consented to serve as a director if so elected. Each nominee who is elected to our Board will serve in such capacity until his or her term expires or his successor has been duly elected and qualified or, if earlier, until such director dies, resigns or is removed.

 

Directors will be elected by a pluralitymajority of the votes cast by the share of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. AsAny current director who does not receive a result,majority of “For” votes at the nine nomineesAnnual Meeting must tender his or her resignation to the Board in accordance with the most votesBoard’s majority vote resignation policy, which is described in our bylaws. Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to the election of each of the director nominees, will not be elected. Broker non-votescounted and will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.this proposal.

 

Our Board recommends that you vote

“FOR” the election of each of the nominated directors.

 

PROPOSAL TWO: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

 

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2017.2019. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as our independent auditors since 2007. We are asking the stockholders to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.2019. The Audit Committee selected Deloitte & Touche LLP in accordance with its charter.

 

The submission of this matter for ratification by stockholders is not legally required; however, the Audit Committee and Board believe that such submission is consistent with best practices in corporate governance and is an opportunity for stockholders to provide direct feedback on an important issue of corporate governance. If the selection is not ratified, the Audit Committee will consider whether it is appropriate to select another independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee continually monitors the services and fees of the independent auditors and even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may select different auditors at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our Company and our stockholders.

 

The Audit Committee has approved all services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP. A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement, and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions you may ask.

 

Fees Paid to Independent Auditors

 

The following table reflects fees for professional audit services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for (i) the audit of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015;2017 and (ii) fees billed for other services.

 

 2016 2015  2018 2017
Audit Fees (1) $1,516,000  $1,486,000  $ 1,637,000  $ 1,614,000
Audit Related Fees (2)  10,000   117,000  77,000 39,000
Tax Fees (3)  355,000   780,000  462,000 282,000
All Other Fees (4)  13,000   2,000    2,000 2,000
Total $1,894,000  $2,385,000  $ 2,178,000  $ 1,927,000

 

41

(1)Audit Fees consist of professional services and related expenses for the review of interim financial statements, the audit of our annual financial statements and statutory financial audits outside of our annual financial statements.

(2)Audit related fees include professional services and related expenses for services in connection with merger and acquisition activity.

(3)Tax Fees include professional services for tax return preparation, tax advisory services and income tax audit support.

(4)Fees include subscription costs.


Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services

 

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee of our Board is responsible for reviewing and approving, in advance, any audit and any permissible non-audit engagement between the Company and its independent auditors. Deloitte & Touche LLP’s engagement to conduct the audit of RigNet, Inc. for fiscal 20162018 was approved in advance by the Audit Committee on August 2, 2016.July 31, 2018. All (100.0%) of the services covered in the table above were approved by the Audit Committee and none were provided under thede minimis exception of Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.Act.

 

We have been advised by Deloitte & Touche LLP that substantially all of the work done in conjunction with its 2016 audit of the Company’s financial statements for the most recently completed fiscal year was performed by full-time employees and partners of Deloitte & Touche LLP. The Audit Committee has determined that the provisionsprovision of services rendered for all other fees, as described above, is compatible with maintaining independence of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

 

Proposal No. 2 must be approved by a majority of the votes cast on the proposal. As approval of auditors is a routine matter on which brokers may vote without instructions, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on this proposal as none are expected to occur and abstentions will have no effect on this proposal under Delaware law as they are not votes cast. If the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP is not ratified accordingly, our Board will consider whether we should select another independent registered public accounting firm as our auditors.

 

Our Board recommends that you vote

“FOR” the ratification of Independent Public AccountantsAccountants.

 

PROPOSAL THREE: ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTING ON COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERSAPPROVE THE RIGNET, INC. 2019 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

 

The Dodd-Frank Act providesBoard of Directors has adopted, and recommends that the Company’s stockholders approve, the RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”). The 2019 Plan permits the grant of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance stock awards, performance unit awards, annual cash incentive awards, other stock-based awards and cash-based awards (collectively “awards”). Stockholder approval of the 2019 Plan is required by NASDAQ rules. If we receive stockholder approval, the 2019 Plan will become effective as of May 8, 2019. If we do not receive stockholder approval, the 2019 Plan will not go into effect and our 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”) will remain in effect and we may continue to make awards under the 2010 Plan until May 26, 2020, after which date no new awards may be granted under the 2010 Plan. A summary of the material terms of the 2019 Plan is provided below, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the 2019 Plan that is included in Annex A to this proxy statement.

Purpose of the 2019 Plan

As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, annual and long-term incentive compensation plays an important part in our pay-for-performance philosophy. Incentive awards also help us remain competitive in retaining and attracting highly qualified employees upon whom, in large measure, the future growth and success of RigNet depend. In 2018, we granted equity compensation to approximately 13% of our employees throughout RigNet.

The purposes of the 2019 Plan are:

to optimize the profitability and growth of RigNet through annual and long-term incentives which are consistent with our goals and which link all or a portion of the compensation of employees and directors to the value of our common stock and thereby align the interests of employees and directors more closely with those of our stockholders;

to provide employees and directors with an incentive for excellence in individual performance;

to promote teamwork among our employees and directors; and

to replace the 2010 Plan, which will not permit the grant of new awards after May 26, 2020.

The 2019 Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to RigNet in its ability to motivate, attract and retain the services of employees and directors who make significant contributions to our success and to allow our employees and directors to share in the success of RigNet.

42

Approving the 2019 Plan would further these objectives by allowing us to continue to grant annual and long-term equity incentive compensation, including incentive stock options. If the 2019 Plan is not approved, we will continue to meet our long-term equity compensation needs under our existing 2010 Plan.

Highlights of Key Corporate Governance Practices and Provisions under the 2019 Plan

We believe that the 2019 Plan will promote the interests of our stockholders and is consistent with the principles of good corporate governance. The 2019 Plan includes the following practices and provisions.

●      Administered by an independent committee. Awards to executive officers will be administered by our Compensation Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors who meet the SEC and NASDAQ standards for independence.

●      No “liberal” change in control definition. The change in control definition in the 2019 Plan is not “liberal” and, for example, would not occur merely upon stockholder approval of a transaction. A change in control must actually occur in order for the change in control provisions of the 2019 Plan to be triggered.

●      No “liberal” share counting with respect to all awards. The 2019 Plan prohibits the reuse of shares withheld or delivered to satisfy the exercise price of an option or stock appreciation right or to satisfy tax-withholding requirements of any award. Additionally, settlement of SARs in shares of stock will result in a reduction in shares available under the 2019 Plan in an amount equal to the number of shares subject to the SAR, regardless of the number of shares ultimately issued to settle the SAR upon exercise.

●      Cap on Compensation Paid to Non-Employee Directors. With respect to any single fiscal year, the aggregate dollar value of shares that may be granted or awarded to a single non-employee director may not exceed $300,000, with a limited exception for a non-executive chair or vice-chair of the Board.

●      No discounted stock options or SARs. All stock option and SAR awards under the 2019 Plan must have an exercise or base price that is not less than the opportunity to indicate how frequentlyfair market value of the Company should seek an advisory voteunderlying common stock on the compensationdate of grant.

●      No repricing of stock options or SARs. The 2019 Plan prohibits any repricing of stock options or SARs for shares or cash.

●      No tax gross ups. The 2019 Plan does not include any tax gross up provisions.

Shares Available for Issuance under the 2019 Plan

The shares issuable pursuant to awards granted under the 2019 Plan will be shares of common stock. The maximum number of shares that may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2019 Plan (the “Share Reserve”) is 2,175,000 (which was the number of shares available for issuance under the 2010 Plan as of December 31, 2018), subject to adjustment as described below. Any shares granted under the 2010 Plan after December 31, 2018 will reduce the number of shares available for grant under the 2019 Plan. The maximum number of shares that can be issued upon the exercise of incentive stock options is 2,175,000.

If any award granted under the 2019 Plan is forfeited or otherwise expires, terminates or is cancelled without the issuance of the shares in full, the shares covered by such awards (or the forfeited portion thereof) again will be available for future grant under the 2019 Plan. In addition, if any award granted under the 2010 Plan, is forfeited or otherwise expires, terminates or is cancelled without the issuance of the shares in full, the shares covered by such awards (or the forfeited portion thereof) will be added to and available for future grant under the 2019 Plan. For the avoidance of doubt, the following shares will count against the shares remaining available for use under the 2019 Plan: (i) shares withheld from an award granted under the 2019 Plan to satisfy tax withholding requirements; (ii) the full number of shares subject to an option granted under the 2019 Plan, even if the exercise price is satisfied through net-settlement or by delivering shares to RigNet; and (iii) the full number of shares subject to a stock appreciation right granted under the 2019 Plan (rather than the net number of shares actually delivered upon exercise).

If the 2019 Plan is approved, the 2019 Plan will become effective May 8, 2019 and no further awards will be made under any prior plans.

Determination of Number of Shares for the 2019 Plan

The Board and the Compensation Committee considered various factors, including potential burn rate, potential dilution or overhang and historical grant practices, in determining the number of shares to be available for issuance under the 2019 Plan.

43

We actively manage our long-term dilution by limiting the number of shares subject to equity awards that we grant annually, commonly expressed as a percentage of total shares outstanding and referred to as “burn rate.” Burn rate is a key measure of dilution that shows how rapidly a company is depleting its shares reserved for equity compensation plans, and differs from annual dilution because it does not take into account cancellations and other shares returned to the reserve. In order to calculate burn rate, we include the number of stock options granted in any given period, plus the number of full value shares earned during the period and divide the total by the weighted average common shares outstanding.

We have calculated the burn rate under the 2010 Plan for the past three years, as set forth in the following table (share numbers rounded and reported in thousands):

YearOptions GrantedEarned Full Value SharesTotalWeighted Average Common Shares OutstandingBurn Rate
  20186033739718,7132.13%
  2017-11011018,0090.61%
  20161125516717,7680.94%

An additional metric that we use to measure the cumulative impact of our equity program is potential dilution or overhang. We calculate this as (A) the number of shares subject to equity awards outstanding but not exercised or settled, plus (B) the number of shares available for future grant, divided by (C) the total common shares outstanding at the end of the year plus (A) and (B). Our potential dilution or overhang as of December 31, 2018 was 12.9% and our three-year average potential dilution or overhang for the three most recently completed years was 15.0%. As this proposal does not propose to increase the shares available for issuance pursuant to Company plans (but rather to transfer such shares from the 2010 Plan to the 2019 Plan) approval of this proposal should not have any material effect on the Company’s NEOs,potential dilution or overhang.

The following are the factors that were material to the evaluation by the Board and Compensation Committee in determining acceptable and targeted levels of dilution: competitive data from relevant peer companies, the current and future accounting expense associated with our equity award practices, stockholder feedback and the influence of certain proxy advisory firms. Our equity programs are revisited at least annually and assessed against these and other factors.

We estimate based on historical grant information that the availability of 2,175,000 shares (subject to adjustment as discloseddescribed herein) under the 2019 Plan would provide a sufficient number of shares to enable us to continue to make awards at historical average annual rates for approximately four years. In approving the Share Reserve under the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee determined that reserving shares sufficient for four years of new awards at historical grant rates is in line with the practice of our peer companies.

Key Data on Outstanding Equity Awards and Shares Available for Future Awards

The following table summarizes the actual shares outstanding and shares remaining under the 2010 Plan (share numbers rounded) as of December 31, 2018 without giving effect to this Proposal 3. Our incentive compensation program grants are generally awarded in the first quarter of each year. The closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2018 was $12.64. As of December 31, 2018, there were 19,464,847 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

 OutstandingWeighted Average Term (in years)Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2018324,000    6.37$ 20.41
Outstanding full value awards as of December 31, 2018411,000  
Other outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2018-  

Shares remaining available for future grant as of December 31, 2018 under the 2010 Plan

2,175,000  
Proposed shares available for future awards under 2019 Plan (inclusive of shares available under the 2010 Plan)2,175,000  

Any grants made after December 31, 2018 under the 2010 Plan will be counted against and deducted on a share-for-share basis from the Share Reserve under the 2019 Plan. Upon approval of the 2019 Plan, all shares then remaining available for future awards under the 2010 Plan will be cancelled and no further grants will be made under the 2010 Plan. If for any reason the 2019 Plan is not approved by stockholders, the 2010 Plan reserve shares will not be cancelled and those shares will remain available for grant under the 2010 Plan as currently in effect.

44

Limits on Awards to Non-Employee Directors

With respect to any single fiscal year, the aggregate value of awards that may be granted or awarded to any single non-employee director pursuant to the Securities2019 Plan may not exceed $300,000 based on the aggregate grant date fair value of all awards granted to such non-employee director in such fiscal year (computed in accordance with applicable financial reporting rules). The Board may make exceptions to this limit for a non-executive Chair or Vice Chair of the Board, as the Board may determine in its discretion, provided that the aggregate grant date fair value of all awards granted to the Chair or Vice-Chair cannot exceed $400,000 in any single fiscal year.

Administration and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules. By voting onEligibility

The 2019 Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee, except that the Board will administer the 2019 Plan with respect to non-employee directors of RigNet. The Board also may at any time assumes the power, authority and duties of the Compensation Committee (and any reference to the Compensation Committee in this proposal stockholders may indicate whether they would prefershall also refer to the Board to the extent that the advisory voteBoard assumes the administrative authority of the 2019 Plan). The Compensation Committee generally may delegate its power, authority and duties under the 2019 Plan, except as prohibited by law.

The Compensation Committee will determine (i) who among those eligible to participate in the 2019 Plan will be granted awards, (ii) the amounts and types of awards to be granted, and (iii) the terms and conditions of all awards, and it will construe and interpret the terms of the 2019 Plan. Determinations of the Compensation Committee are final, binding and conclusive.

Individuals eligible to receive awards under the 2019 Plan include employees of RigNet or a subsidiary or affiliate of RigNet, consultants, agents or other service providers to RigNet or a subsidiary or affiliate of RigNet, and directors of RigNet. As of February 15, 2019, 9 directors and approximately 600 employees would be eligible to receive awards under the 2019 Plan.

Type of Awards

Stock Options

Stock options may be either nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options. The exercise price of any stock option must be equal to or greater than the fair market value of a share on the compensationdate the option is granted. The term of the Company’s NEOs occur once every one, two or threea stock option cannot exceed ten years.

 

After careful considerationA stock option’s terms and conditions, including the number of shares to which the option pertains, exercise price, vesting and expiration of the option, are determined by the Compensation Committee and set forth in an award document. Payment for shares purchased upon exercise of a stock option must be made in full at the time of purchase. The exercise price may be paid (a) in cash, (b) by tendering previously acquired shares having an aggregate value at the time of exercise equal to the total exercise price, (c) through a reduction in the number of shares received through the exercise of the option or (d) by a combination of (a), (b) and (c).

Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)

Freestanding and tandem SARs, or any combination thereof, may be granted to participants. A freestanding SAR means a SAR that is granted independently of any stock options. A tandem SAR means a SAR that is granted in connection with a related option, the exercise of which requires forfeiture of the right to purchase a share under the related option (and where a share is purchased under the option, the tandem SAR similarly is cancelled). Each SAR grant will be set forth in an award document that will specify the grant price, the term of the SAR and such other provisions as the Compensation Committee determines. The term of a SAR cannot exceed ten years.

The grant price of a freestanding SAR will equal at least the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. The grant price of a tandem SAR will equal the exercise price of the related stock option.

Upon exercise of a SAR, a participant will be entitled to receive payment in an amount determined by multiplying the difference between the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise over the grant price, by the number of shares with respect to which the SAR is exercised. At the discretion of the Compensation Committee, the payment upon SAR exercise may be in cash, in shares of equivalent value, or in some combination of cash and shares.

45

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

Each grant of restricted stock or RSUs will be evidenced by an award document that will specify the period of restriction on transferability, the number of shares (or units tied to the value of shares) granted, and such other provisions as the Compensation Committee may determine, including time-based vesting requirements and restrictions based upon the achievement of specific performance goals. Restricted stock or RSUs will be forfeited to the extent that a participant fails to satisfy the applicable vesting requirements, conditions or restrictions during the period of restriction.

Generally, shares of restricted stock will become freely transferable by the participant after the last day of the applicable period of restriction, and RSUs will be paid in a single lump sum following the close of the applicable period of restriction in the form of cash or in shares (or in a combination of cash and shares) as determined by the Compensation Committee.

Participants holding restricted stock generally have the right to vote the shares during the period of restriction and, unless otherwise provided in the award document, will be credited with dividends paid with respect to the underlying shares (if any). Participants awarded RSUs are not entitled to similar voting rights or dividends (unless, with respect to dividends, otherwise provided in the award document). Any dividends or dividend equivalents declared with respect to shares of restricted stock and RSUs paid in stock will be subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying shares of restricted stock and RSUs.

Restricted Performance Units (“RPUs”) and Restricted Performance Shares (“RPSs”)

Each RPU will have an initial value established by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant. Each RPS will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee will set performance goals, the achievement of which will determine the number and/or value of RPUs and RPSs that are paid to the participant. RPUs and RPSs will be forfeited to the extent that the applicable performance goals are not satisfied during the performance period.

Unless otherwise provided in an award document, payment of earned RPUs or RPSs will be made in a single lump sum following the close of the applicable performance period in the form of cash or shares (or a combination thereof), with an aggregate fair market value equal to the value of the earned RPUs or RPSs at the close of the performance period. At the discretion of the Compensation Committee and as provided in an award document, participants may be entitled to (i) receive dividends or dividend equivalents declared with respect to shares underlying RPUs or RPSs not yet distributed to participants and (ii) exercise voting rights with respect to RPSs. Any such dividends or dividend equivalents paid in shares and declared with respect to RPUs or RPSs will be subject to the same vesting conditions as the underlying RPUs or RPSs.

Performance Measures

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally provides that a corporation may not deduct compensation amounts in excess of $1,000,000 paid to any of its named executive officers in any year. Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”), this Proposal,limitation did not apply to options, SARs or other awards that were conditioned on the Board has determinedachievement of performance goals if certain requirements were met. The 2010 Plan was designed to allow the Compensation Committee to grant awards that an advisory vote on executivewere intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), although the Compensation Committee reserved the discretion to grant or approve awards or compensation that occurs every yearwere not exempt from the deduction limits.

The Tax Act repealed the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m), effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. Accordingly, awards granted under the 2019 Plan will be subject to the deduction limit under Section 162(m). However, while the performance-based compensation exemption is no longer available for new awards, the most appropriate alternative forCompensation Committee may continue to grant awards with performance-based vesting requirements under the Company, and therefore2019 Plan, using performance goals based on performance measures that the Board recommends that stockholders vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on the compensationCompensation Committee selects in its discretion.

Change in Control

The 2019 Plan defines “Change in Control” to require consummation of the Company’s NEOs.

You may cast your vote on your preferredtriggering transaction and occurs generally upon (i) a person acquiring 80% of the fair market value or total voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, three years or abstain from voting when you vote in response to this proposal. The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by the stockholders will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been recommended by the stockholders. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on the Board or the Company, the Board may decide that it is in the best interestspower of the Company, and its stockholders to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation that differs from the option that received the highest number of votes from the Company’s stockholders.

This proposal must be approved by the affirmative vote(ii) a replacement of a majority of the shares presentmembers of the board of directors by directors who are not endorsed by a majority of the members of the incumbent board, or (iii) the transfer of 80% or more of the total gross fair market value of all the assets of the Company. Vesting of awards as a result of a change in personcontrol will depend on whether the awards are assumed, converted or representedreplaced by proxythe resulting entity from the transaction. Except as may otherwise be provided in the applicable award agreement:

●      For awards that are assumed, converted or replaced by the resulting entity, no automatic vesting will occur upon the change in control. Instead, the awards, as adjusted in connection with the transaction, will continue to vest in accordance with their terms. Even if assumed, converted or replaced, the awards will vest if the award recipient has a separation from service within twelve months after the change in control other than for “cause” or by the award recipient for “good reason” (as defined in the applicable award agreement). For performance awards subject to accelerated vested as contemplated in the preceding sentence, the amount vesting will be based on the greater of (a) achievement of all performance goals at the Annual Meeting“target” level or (b) the actual level of achievement of performance goals as of the fiscal quarter end preceding the change in control.

46

●      For awards that are not assumed, converted or replaced, the awards will vest upon the change in control. For performance awards, the amount vesting will be based on the greater of (a) achievement of all performance goals at the “target” level or (b) the actual level of achievement of performance goals as of the fiscal quarter end preceding the change in control.

Clawback of Awards

If an award has been paid to an executive officer or to his or her spouse or beneficiary, and the Compensation Committee later determines that financial results used to determine the amount of that award are materially restated, RigNet will seek repayment or recovery of the award. In addition, the Compensation Committee may provide that any participant and/or any award, including any shares subject to or issued under an award, are subject to any other recovery, recoupment, clawback and/or other forfeiture policy maintained by RigNet from time to time.

Amendment and Termination

The Compensation Committee has the right to amend and terminate the 2019 Plan at any time. The Compensation Committee may amend an award previously granted without the prior written consent of the award holder if such amendment does not adversely affect the award in any material way and may amend any award previously granted with the written consent of the award holder.

Without the prior approval of our stockholders, the 2019 Plan may not be materially amended if stockholder approval is required by law or applicable stock exchange listing requirement, or if the amendment would increase the number of shares available for awards under the 2019 Plan, or permit options, SARs or similar awards to be repriced, replaced, or regranted through cancellation in exchange for cash or another award, or by lowering the exercise or purchase price of a previously granted award (except in the case of a change in control or for certain adjustments and award substitutions authorized under other provisions of the 2019 Plan as noted in the “Adjustments” section below). In any event, no awards may be granted under the 2019 Plan on or after May 9, 2029.

Adjustments

If RigNet effects a subdivision or consolidation of shares of stock or other capital adjustment, the maximum number and class of shares that may be awarded under the 2019 Plan, the number and class of and/or price of shares subject to outstanding awards, and the annual award limits will be adjusted in the same manner and to the same extent as all other shares.

If there are material changes in the capital structure of RigNet resulting from the payment of a special dividend, a spin-off, the sale of a substantial portion of RigNet’s assets, a merger or consolidation in which RigNet is not the surviving entity, or other extraordinary non-recurring event affecting the capital structure and the value of shares, the Compensation Committee will make equitable adjustments in the maximum number and class of shares that may be awarded under the 2019 Plan, the number and class of and/or price of shares subject to outstanding awards, and the annual award limits, to prevent the dilution or enlargement of the rights of award recipients.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The rules concerning the federal income tax consequences with respect to awards made pursuant to the 2019 Plan are technical, and reasonable persons may differ on the proper interpretation of the rules. Moreover, the applicable statutory and regulatory provisions are subject to changes, as are their interpretations and applications, which may vary in individual circumstances. The following discussion is designed to provide only a brief, general summary description of the federal income tax consequences associated with the awards, based on a good faith interpretation of the current federal income tax laws, regulations (including applicable proposed regulations) and judicial and administrative interpretations. The following discussion does not set forth any federal tax consequences other than income tax consequences or any state, local or foreign tax consequences that may apply.

Incentive Stock Options (“ISOs”). An optionee does not recognize taxable income upon the grant or upon the exercise of an ISO (although the exercise of an ISO may in some cases trigger liability for the alternative minimum tax). Upon the sale of ISO shares, the optionee recognizes income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of those shares on the date of sale over the exercise price of the ISO shares. The income is taxed at the long-term capital gains rate if the optionee has not disposed of the stock within two years after the date of the grant of the ISO and has held the shares for at least one year after the date of exercise, and we are not entitled to votea federal income tax deduction. ISO holding period requirements are waived when an optionee dies.

47

If an optionee sells ISO shares before having held them for at least one year after the date of exercise and two years after the date of grant, the optionee recognizes ordinary income to the extent of the lesser of: (a) the gain realized upon the sale; or (b) the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price. Any additional gain is treated as long-term or short-term capital gain depending upon how long the optionee has held the ISO shares prior to disposition. In the year of any such disposition, we will receive a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income that the optionee recognizes, if any, as a result of the disposition, subject to applicable limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Nonqualified Stock Option (“NQSOs”). An optionee does not recognize taxable income upon the grant of an NQSO. Upon the exercise of such a stock option, the optionee recognizes ordinary income to the extent the fair market value of the shares received upon exercise of the NQSO on the date of exercise exceeds the exercise price. We will receive an income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income that the optionee recognizes upon the exercise of the stock option, subject to any applicable limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Restricted Stock. A participant who receives an award of restricted stock does not generally recognize taxable income at the meeting. This means that abstentions will have the same effect as votes against alltime of the proposed frequencies, butaward. Instead, the participant recognizes ordinary income in the first taxable year in which his or her interest in the shares becomes either: (a) freely transferable; or (b) no longer subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. The amount of taxable income is equal to the fair market value of the shares less the cash, if any, paid for the shares.

We will have no effect onreceive a compensation expense deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant in the taxable year in which frequency is preferred by stockholders. Broker non–votesrestrictions lapse, subject to any applicable limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code.

SARs. A participant who exercises a SAR will have no effectrecognize ordinary income upon the exercise equal to the amount of cash and the fair market value of any shares received as a result of the exercise. We will receive an income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income that the participant recognizes upon the exercise of the SAR, subject to any applicable limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Other Awards. In the case of an award of RSUs, RPUs, RPSs, or cash, the participant would generally recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to any cash received and the fair market value of any shares received on the outcomedate of payment. In that taxable year, we would receive a federal income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income that the participant has recognized, subject to any applicable limitations under Section 162(m) of the vote.Code.

 

Section 409A. Section 409A of the Code provides special tax rules applicable to programs that provide for a deferral of compensation. Failure to comply with those requirements will result in accelerated recognition of income for tax purposes along with an additional tax equal to 20% of the amount included in income, and interest on deemed underpayments in certain circumstances. While certain awards under the 2019 Plan could be subject to Section 409A, the 2019 Plan has been drafted to comply with the requirements of Section 409A, where applicable.

2019 Plan Benefits

Because benefits under the 2019 Plan will depend on the Compensation Committee’s actions and the fair market value of the shares at various future dates, it is not possible to determine the benefits that will be received by directors, executive officers and other employees if the 2019 Plan is approved by stockholders.

Our Board recommends that you vote

To conduct an advisory vote on RigNet’s named

executive officer compensation in “ONE” year intervals.“FOR” approval of the RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

 

PROPOSAL FOUR: ADVISORY VOTE ONTO APPROVE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders will vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution regardingapproving the compensation of the Company’s NEOs as required pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.

 

We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are competitive, focused on pay-for-performance and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. This advisory stockholder vote, commonly known as “Say-On-Pay,”


gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to express approval or withhold approval of the compensation we pay our NEOs through voting for or against the following resolution:

 

48

“Resolved, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s NEOs as disclosed in the Company’s 20172019 proxy statement pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other executive compensation tables and related discussion.”

 

The Company and the Compensation Committee remain committed to the compensation philosophy, policies and objectives outlined under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this proxy statement. As always, theThe Compensation Committee will continue to review all elements of the executive compensation program and take any steps it deems necessary to continue to fulfill the objectives of the program.

 

Stockholders are encouraged to carefully review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement for a detailed discussion of the Company’s executive compensation program.

 

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Company or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. We currently conduct annual advisory votes on executive compensation, and we expect to conduct the next advisory vote at our 20182020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

This proposaladvisory resolution must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote at the meeting.Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to the approval of this proposal will have the effect of a vote against this proposal.

 

Our Board recommends that you vote

“FOR” the resolution to approve on a non-binding advisory basis

the compensation of RigNet’s named executive officers.


49

 

APPENDICES

A. NON-GAAP MEASURE RECONCILIATION OF MANAGEMENT EBITDA

We define Management EBITDA as Adjusted EBITDA as reported in our financial reports, further adjusted based on budgeted exchange rates and other exceptional items, as approved by the Board. Both Management EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss), operating income (loss) or any other measure of financial performance calculated or presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

The following table presents a reconciliation of our net income (loss) to Management EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation as disclosed in RigNet’s Form 10-K:

Net loss $     (62,314)

(LOGO) 

RIGNET, INC.
C/O BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS
PO BOX 1342
BRENTWOOD, NY 11717

Interest expense

VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions

3,969
Depreciation and for electronic deliveryamortization33,154
Loss on sales of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy cardproperty, plant and equipment, net of retirements331
Stock-based compensation4,712
Restructuring842
Change in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. 

fair value of earn-out/contingent consideration
3,543












Executive departure costs406
Acquisition costs2,284
GX dispute50,612
Income tax expense(2,746)
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP measure)  
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E25184-P87860KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY34,793


Further Adjustments to Compute Management EBITDA:

Foreign currency adjustment approved by the Board 318
    
RIGNET, INC.For
All
Withhold
All
For All
Except
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.Management EBITDA (non-GAAP measure)  
The Board of Directors recommends you vote “FOR” the following:

1.Election of Directors
Nominees:
01)     James H. Browning06)     Keith Olsen
02)     Mattia Caprioli07)     Brent K. Whittington
03)     Charles L. Davis08)     Ditlef de Vibe
04)     Kevin Mulloy    09)     Steven E. Pickett
05)     Kevin J. O’Hara
The Board of Directors recommends you vote “FOR” the following proposal:ForAgainstAbstain
2.To ratify the selection of Deloitte &Touche LLP as theCompany’s IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote “1 YEAR” for the following proposal:1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
3.To indicate, on a non-binding advisory basis, the preferred frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. ☐
The Board of Directors recommends you vote “FOR” the following proposal:ForAgainstAbstain
4.Approve named executive officers’ compensation as a non-binding advisory vote.
NOTE: In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other matters as may properly come before the annual meeting or any postponementsor adjournments thereof or other matters permitted by Rule 14a -4(c)under the Exchange Act.
 YesNo
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date
$   35,111

V.1.1

The Board, its Compensation Committee and management use Management EBITDA to assess performance in determining certain components of our executive compensation.

50

B. ANNEX A

Rignet, Inc.
OMNIBUS Incentive Plan

(As Adopted [DATE])

Article I

ESTABLISHMENT, PURPOSE AND DURATION

1.1       Establishment. The Company hereby establishes an incentive compensation plan, to be known as the “RigNet, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan”, as set forth in this document. The Plan permits the grant of Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Stock Options, SARs, Restricted Stock, RSUs, Performance Stock Awards, Performance Unit Awards, Annual Cash Incentive Awards, Other Stock-Based Awards and Cash-Based Awards. The Plan is effective as of [DATE] (the “Effective Date”); provided that the Company’s stockholders approve the adoption of the Plan within twelve (12) months after the date of adoption of the Plan by the Board.

1.2       Purpose of the Plan. The Plan is intended to advance the best interests of the Company, its Affiliates and its stockholders by providing those persons who have substantial responsibility for the management and growth of the Company and its Affiliates with additional performance incentives and an opportunity to obtain or increase their proprietary interest in the Company, thereby encouraging them to continue in their employment or affiliation with the Company or its Affiliates.

1.3       Duration of Plan. The Plan shall continue indefinitely until it is terminated pursuant to Section 16.1. No Award may be granted under the Plan on or after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date. The applicable provisions of the Plan will continue in effect with respect to an Award granted under the Plan for as long as such Award remains outstanding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Incentive Stock Option may be granted under the Plan on or after the date that is ten (10) years from the earlier of (a) adoption of the Plan by the Board and (b) the Effective Date.

Article II

DEFINITIONS

Each word and phrase defined in this Article shall have the meaning set out below throughout the Plan, unless the context in which any such word or phrase appears reasonably requires a broader, narrower or different meaning.

2.1       Affiliate” means any corporation, partnership, limited liability company or association, trust or other entity or organization, which, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Company. For purposes of the preceding sentence, “control” (including, with correlative meanings, the terms “controlled by” and “under common control with”), as used with respect to any entity or organization, shall mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power (a) to vote more than fifty percent (50%) of the securities having ordinary voting power for the election of directors or comparable individuals of the controlled entity or organization, or (b) to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the controlled entity or organization, whether through the ownership of voting securities or by contract or otherwise.

2.2       Annual Cash Incentive Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Article XI.

2.3       Authorized Shares” shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 4.1(a).

2.4       Award” means, individually or collectively, a grant under the Plan of an Incentive Stock Option, a Nonqualified Stock Option, a SAR, Restricted Stock, a RSU, a Performance Stock Award, a Performance Unit Award, an Annual Cash Incentive Award, an Other Stock-Based Award or a Cash-Based Award, in each case subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan.

2.5       Award Agreement” means an agreement that sets forth the terms and conditions applicable to an Award granted under the Plan.

51

2.6       Beneficial Owner” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act.

2.7        Board” means the board of directors of the Company.

2.8       Cash-Based Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Article XIII.

2.9       Change in Control” means (i) a change in ownership occurring as the result of a person or group acquiring Stock of the Company, which, when combined with the Stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than eighty percent (80%) of the total fair market value or total voting power of the Company; provided the person or group was not considered as owning more than eighty percent (80%) of the value or voting power prior to the acquisition; (ii) a change in effective control of the Company occurring as the result of the replacement of a majority of the members of the Board by directors whose appointment or election is not endorsed by a majority of the members of the Board before the date of the appointment or election; or (iii) a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company occurring as the result of a person or group acquiring assets from the Company that have a total gross fair market value equal to or more than eighty percent (80%) of the total gross fair market value of all the assets of the Company immediately prior to such acquisition. The determination of whether a Change of Control has occurred will be made in accordance with Code Section 409A and the regulations thereunder.

2.10       Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time.

2.11       Committee” means (a) in the case of an Award granted to a Director, the Board, and (b) in the case of any other Award granted under the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board or, if the Compensation Committee of the Board chooses to delegate it duties, a committee of at least two (2) persons who are members of the Compensation Committee of the Board and are appointed by the Compensation Committee of the Board to administer the Plan. The Board may appoint a special committee consisting of one or more Directors for the purpose of granting certain specified Awards under the Plan. As to Awards, grants or other transactions that are authorized by the Committee and that are intended to be exempt under Rule 16b-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act, the requirements of Rule 16b-3(d)(1) of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act with respect to committee action must also be satisfied.

2.12       Company” means RigNet, Inc., a Delaware corporation, or any successor (by reincorporation, merger or otherwise).

2.13       Director” means a director of the Company who is not an Employee.

2.14       Disability” or “Disabled” means a determination by the Company’s long-term disability carrier that a Holder is disabled in accordance with the Company’s long-term disability insurance plan, provided the definition of disability applied under such plan complies with the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.409A-3(i)(4), or, in the case of a Holder who is not covered under such plan, a determination made by the Social Security Administration that the Holder is totally disabled.

2.15       Dividend Equivalent” means a payment equivalent in amount to dividends paid to the Company’s stockholders.

2.16       Effective Date” shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 1.1.

2.17       Employee” means (a) a person employed by the Company or any Affiliate as a common law employee, or (b) a person who has agreed to become a common law employee of the Company or any Affiliate and is expected to become such within six (6) months from the date of a determination made for purposes of the Plan.

2.18       Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any successor act.

2.19       Fair Market Value” of the Stock as of any particular date means,

(a)       if the Stock is traded on a stock exchange,

(i)       and if the Stock is traded on that date, the closing sale price of the Stock on that date; or

52

(ii)       and if the Stock is not traded on that date, the closing sale price of the Stock on the last trading date immediately preceding that date; as reported on the principal securities exchange on which the Stock is traded; or

(b)       if the Stock is traded in the over-the-counter market,

(i)        and if the Stock is traded on that date, the average between the high bid and low asked price on that date; or

(ii)       and if the Stock is not traded on that date, the average between the high bid and low asked price on the last trading date immediately preceding that date;

as reported in such over-the-counter market; provided, however, that (x) if the Stock is not so traded, or (y) if, in the discretion of the Committee, another means of determining the fair market value of a share of Stock at such date shall be necessary or advisable, the Committee may provide for another method or means for determining such fair market value, which method or means shall comply with the requirements of a reasonable valuation method as described under Section 409A.

2.20       Fiscal Year” means the calendar year.

2.21       Freestanding SAR” means a SAR that is granted independently of any Options, as described in Article VI.

2.22       Holder” means a person who has been granted an Award or any person who is entitled to receive shares of Stock or cash under an Award.

2.23       Incentive Stock Option” or “ISO” means an option to purchase Stock granted pursuant to Article V that is designated as an incentive stock option and that is intended to satisfy the requirements of section 422 of the Code.

2.24       Insider” shall mean an individual who is, on the relevant date, an officer, a Director, or more than ten percent (10%) Beneficial Owner of any class of the Company’s equity securities that is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, as determined by the Board in accordance with Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

2.25       Mature Shares” means shares of Stock that the Holder has held for at least six (6) months.

2.26       Nonqualified Stock Option” or “NQSO” means a “nonqualified stock option” to purchase Stock granted pursuant to Article V that does not satisfy the requirements of section 422 of the Code.

2.27       Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option.

2.28       Option Price” shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 5.4.

2.29       Other Stock-Based Award” means an equity-based or equity-related Award not otherwise described by the terms and provisions of the Plan that is granted pursuant to Article XII.

2.30       Parent Corporation” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations ending with the Company if, at the time of the action or transaction, each of the corporations other than the Company owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the chain.

2.31        Performance Goals” means one or more of the criteria described in Section 9.2 on which the performance goals applicable to an Award are based.

2.32       Performance Stock Award” means an Award designated as a performance stock award granted to a Holder pursuant to Article IX.

53

2.33       Performance Unit Award” means an Award designated as a performance unit award granted to a Holder pursuant to Article IX.

2.34       Period of Restriction” means the period during which Restricted Stock is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (based on the passage of time, the achievement of Performance Goals, or upon the occurrence of other events as determined by the Committee, in its discretion), as provided in Article VII.

2.35       Plan” means the RigNet, Inc. 2019 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as set forth in this document as it may be amended from time to time.

2.36       Restricted Stock” means shares of restricted Stock issued or granted under the Plan pursuant to Article VII.

2.37       Restricted Stock Award” means an authorization by the Committee to issue or transfer Restricted Stock to a Holder.

2.38       RSU” means a restricted stock unit credited to a Holder’s ledger account maintained by the Company pursuant to Article VIII.

2.39       RSU Award” means an Award granted pursuant to Article VIII.

2.40       SAR” means a stock appreciation right granted under the Plan pursuant to Article VI.

2.41       Section 409A” means section 409A of the Code and the regulations and other guidance promulgated by the United States Department of Treasury and/or the United States Internal Revenue Service under section 409A of the Code, or any successor statute.

2.42       Separation from Service” means, except as otherwise provided in the case of an ISO in the following sentence of this Section 2.42, the termination of the Award recipient’s employment or service relationship with the Company and all Affiliates as determined under Section 409A. “Separation from Service” means, in the case of an ISO, the termination of the Employee’s employment relationship with all of the Company, any Parent Corporation, any Subsidiary Corporation and any parent or subsidiary corporation (within the meaning of section 422(a)(2) of the Code) of any such corporation that issues or assumes an ISO in a transaction to which section 424(a) of the Code applies.

2.43       Stock” means the common stock of the Company, $0.001 par value per share (or such other par value as may be designated by act of the Company’s stockholders).

2.44       Subsidiary Corporation” means any corporation (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain of corporations beginning with the Company if, at the time of the action or transaction, each of the corporations other than the last corporation in an unbroken chain owns stock possessing fifty percent (50%) or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock in one of the other corporations in the chain.

2.45       Substantial Risk of Forfeiture” shall have the meaning ascribed to that term in Section 409A.

2.46       Tandem SAR” means a SAR that is granted in connection with a related Option pursuant to Article VI herein, the exercise of which shall require forfeiture of the right to purchase a share of Stock under the related Option (and when a share of Stock is purchased under the Option, the Tandem SAR shall similarly be canceled).

2.47       Ten Percent Stockholder” means an individual, who, at the time the applicable Option is granted, owns stock possessing more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or any Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation. An individual shall be considered as owning the stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for his or her brothers and sisters (whether by the whole or half-blood), spouse, ancestors, and lineal descendants; and stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for a corporation, partnership, estate, or trust, shall be considered as being owned proportionately by or for its stockholders, partners, or beneficiaries.

2.48       Third Party Service Provider” means any consultant, agent, representative, advisor, or independent contractor who renders services to the Company or an Affiliate that (a) are not in connection with the offer and sale of the Company’s securities in a capital raising transaction; and (b) do not directly or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities, or any other person as determined by the Committee.

54

Article III

ELIGIBILITY

Except as otherwise specified in this Article III, the persons who are eligible to receive Awards under the Plan are Employees, Directors and Third Party Service Providers; provided, however, that only those persons who are, on the dates of grant, employees of the Company or any Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation are eligible for grants of Incentive Stock Options under the Plan.

Article IV

GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO AWARDS

4.1       Authority to Grant Awards. The Committee may grant Awards to those Employees, Directors and Third Party Service Providers as the Committee shall from time to time determine, under the terms and conditions of the Plan. Subject only to any applicable limitations set out in the Plan, the number of shares of Stock or other value to be covered by any Award to be granted under the Plan shall be as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion.

(a)       The aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan is 2,175,00 less one share of Stock for every one share of Stock granted under the RigNet. Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan after December 31, 2018. Upon effectiveness of the Plan, no further awards will be made under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan. (the “Authorized Shares”).

(b)       The aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which ISOs may be granted under the Plan is equal to the Authorized Shares.

(c)       The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which ISOs may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which NQSOs may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which SARs may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which Performance Stock Awards may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which Performance Unit Awards payable in shares of Stock may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is equal to the Authorized Shares. The maximum value of cash with respect to which Performance Unit Awards payable in cash may be granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year, determined as of the dates of grants of the Performance Unit Awards, is $3,000,000. The maximum amount that may be paid under Annual Cash Incentive Award(s) granted to an Employee during a Fiscal Year is $3,000,000.

(d)       The aggregate dollar value of shares of Stock that may be granted under the Plan to any director in any Fiscal Year shall be no more than $300,000; provided, however, that with respect to any Chairman or Vice Chairman of the board, that dollar limit shall be $400,000.

(e)       Each of the foregoing numerical limits stated in this Section 4.2 shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.5.

4.2       Shares That Count Against Limit.

(a)       If shares of Stock are withheld from payment of an Award to satisfy tax obligations with respect to the Award, such shares of Stock will count against the aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan.

(b)       If shares of Stock are tendered in payment of the Option Price of an Option, such shares of Stock will count against the aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan.

55

(c)       To the extent that any outstanding Award is forfeited or cancelled for any reason or is settled in cash in lieu of shares of Stock, the shares of Stock allocable to such portion of the Award may again be subject to an Award granted under the Plan.

(d)       When a SAR is settled in shares of Stock, the number of shares of Stock subject to the SAR under the SAR Award Agreement will be counted against the aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan as one share for every share subject to the SAR, regardless of the number of shares used to settle the SAR upon exercise.

(e)       The maximum number of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Plan shall not be reduced to reflect any dividends or Dividend Equivalents that are reinvested into additional shares of Stock or credited as additional Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Shares, or other Stock-Based Awards.

4.3       Non-Transferability. Except as specified in the applicable Award Agreements or in domestic relations court orders, an Award shall not be transferable by the Holder other than by will or under the laws of descent and distribution, and shall be exercisable, during the Holder’s lifetime, only by him or her. Any attempted assignment of an Award in violation of this Section shall be null and void. In the discretion of the Committee, any attempt to transfer an Award other than under the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement may terminate the Award.

4.4       Requirements of Law. The Company shall not be required to sell or issue any shares of Stock under any Award if issuing those shares of Stock would constitute or result in a violation by the Holder or the Company of any provision of any law, statute or regulation of any governmental authority. Specifically, in connection with any applicable statute or regulation relating to the registration of securities, upon exercise of any Option or pursuant to any other Award, the Company shall not be required to issue any shares of Stock unless the Committee has received evidence satisfactory to it to the effect that the Holder will not transfer the shares of Stock except in accordance with applicable law, including receipt of an opinion of counsel satisfactory to the Company to the effect that any proposed transfer complies with applicable law. The determination by the Committee on this matter shall be final, binding and conclusive. The Company may, but shall in no event be obligated to, register any shares of Stock covered by the Plan pursuant to applicable securities laws of any country or any political subdivision. In the event the shares of Stock issuable on exercise of an Option or pursuant to any other Award are not registered, the Company may imprint on the certificate evidencing the shares of Stock any legend that counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law, or, should the shares of Stock be represented by book or electronic entry rather than a certificate, the Company may take such steps to restrict transfer of the shares of Stock as counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law. The Company shall not be obligated to take any other affirmative action in order to cause or enable the exercise of an Option or any other Award, or the issuance of shares of Stock pursuant thereto, to comply with any law or regulation of any governmental authority.

4.5       Changes in the Company’s Capital Structure.

(a)       The existence of outstanding Awards shall not affect in any way the right or power of the Company or its stockholders to make or authorize any or all adjustments, recapitalizations, reorganizations or other changes in the Company’s capital structure or its business, any merger or consolidation of the Company, any issue of bonds, debentures, preferred or prior preference shares ahead of or affecting the Stock or Stock rights, the dissolution or liquidation of the Company, any sale or transfer of all or any part of its assets or business or any other corporate act or proceeding, whether of a similar character or otherwise.

(b)       If the Company shall effect a subdivision or consolidation of Stock or other capital readjustment, the payment of a Stock dividend, or other increase or reduction of the number of shares of Stock outstanding, without receiving compensation therefor in money, services or property, then (i) the number, class or series and per share price of Stock subject to outstanding Awards under the Plan shall be appropriately adjusted in such a manner as to entitle a Holder to receive upon exercise of an Award, for the same aggregate cash consideration, the equivalent total number and class or series of Stock the Holder would have received had the Holder exercised his or her Award in full immediately prior to the event requiring the adjustment; and (ii) the number and class or series of Stock then reserved to be issued under the Plan shall be adjusted by substituting for the total number and class or series of Stock then reserved, that number and class or series of Stock that would have been received by the owner of an equal number of outstanding shares of Stock of each class or series of Stock as the result of the event requiring the adjustment.

56

(c)       If while unexercised Awards remain outstanding under the Plan a Change in Control occurs, then, except as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement or another agreement between the Holder and the Company (provided that such exceptions shall not apply in the case of a reincorporation merger), or as a result of the Committee’s effectuation of one or more of the alternatives described below, there shall be no acceleration of the time at which any Award then outstanding may be exercised, and no later than ten (10) days after the approval by the stockholders of the Company of such Change in Control, the Committee, acting in its sole and absolute discretion without the consent or approval of any Holder, shall act to effect one or more of the following alternatives, which may vary among individual Holders and which may vary among Awards held by any individual Holder (provided that, with respect to a reincorporation merger in which Holders of the Company’s ordinary shares will receive one ordinary share of the successor corporation for each ordinary share of the Company, none of such alternatives shall apply and, without Committee action, each Award shall automatically convert into a similar award of the successor corporation exercisable for the same number of ordinary shares of the successor as the Award was exercisable for ordinary shares of Stock of the Company):

(1)       accelerate the time at which some or all of the Awards then outstanding may be exercised so that such Awards may be exercised in full for a limited period of time on or before a specified date (before or after such Change in Control) fixed by the Committee, after which specified date all such Awards that remain unexercised and all rights of Holders thereunder shall terminate;

(2)       require the mandatory surrender to the Company by all or selected Holders of some or all of the then outstanding Awards held by such Holders (irrespective of whether such Awards are then exercisable under the provisions of the Plan or the applicable Award Agreement evidencing such Award) as of a date, before or after such Change in Control, specified by the Committee, in which event the Committee shall thereupon cancel such Award and the Company shall pay to each such Holder an amount of cash per share equal to the excess, if any, of the per share price offered to stockholders of the Company in connection with such Change in Control over the exercise prices under such Award for such shares;

(3)       with respect to all or selected Holders, have some or all of their then outstanding Awards (whether vested or unvested) assumed or have a new award of a similar nature substituted for some or all of their then outstanding Awards under the Plan (whether vested or unvested) by an entity which is a party to the transaction resulting in such Change in Control and which is then employing such Holder or which is affiliated or associated with such Holder in the same or a substantially similar manner as the Company prior to the Change in Control, or a parent or subsidiary of such entity, provided that (A) such assumption or substitution is on a basis where the excess of the aggregate fair market value of the Stock subject to the Award immediately after the assumption or substitution over the aggregate exercise price of such Stock is equal to the excess of the aggregate fair market value of all Stock subject to the Award immediately before such assumption or substitution over the aggregate exercise price of such Stock; and (B) the assumed rights under such existing Award or the substituted rights under such new Award, as the case may be, will have the same terms and conditions as the rights under the existing Award assumed or substituted for, as the case may be;

(4)       provide that the number and class or series of Stock covered by an Award (whether vested or unvested) theretofore granted shall be adjusted so that such Award when exercised shall thereafter cover the number and class or series of Stock or other securities or property (including, without limitation, cash) to which the Holder would have been entitled pursuant to the terms of the agreement or plan relating to such Change in Control if, immediately prior to such Change in Control, the Holder had been the holder of record of the number of shares of Stock then covered by such Award; or

(5)       make such adjustments to Awards then outstanding as the Committee deems appropriate to reflect such Change in Control (provided, however, that the Committee may determine in its sole and absolute discretion that no such adjustment is necessary to reflect such Change in Control).

Any adjustment effected by the Committee under Section 4.5 shall be designed to provide the Holder with the intrinsic value of his or her Award, as determined prior to the Change in Control, or, if applicable, equalize the Fair Market Value of the Award before and after the Change in Control.

57

In effecting one or more of the alternatives set out in paragraphs (3), (4) or (5) immediately above, and except as otherwise may be provided in an Award Agreement, the Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion and without the consent or approval of any Holder, may accelerate the time at which some or all Awards then outstanding may be exercised.

(d)       In the event of changes in the outstanding Stock by reason of recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers, consolidations, combinations, exchanges or other relevant changes in capitalization occurring after the date of the grant of any Award and not otherwise provided for by this Section 4.5, any outstanding Award and any Award Agreement evidencing such Award shall be subject to adjustment by the Committee in its sole and absolute discretion as to the number and price of Stock or other consideration subject to such Award. In the event of any such change in the outstanding Stock, the aggregate number of shares of Stock available under the Plan may be appropriately adjusted by the Committee, whose determination shall be conclusive.

(e)       After a merger of one or more corporations into the Company or after a consolidation of the Company and one or more corporations in which the Company shall be the surviving corporation, each Holder shall be entitled to have his or her Restricted Stock appropriately adjusted based on the manner in which the shares of Stock were adjusted under the terms of the agreement of merger or consolidation.

(f)       The issuance by the Company of stock of any class or series, or securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, stock of any class or series, for cash or property, or for labor or services either upon direct sale or upon the exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe for them, or upon conversion or exchange of stock or obligations of the Company convertible into, or exchangeable for, stock or other securities, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason of such issuance shall be made with respect to, the number, class or series, or price of shares of Stock then subject to outstanding Awards.

4.6       Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code. No Holder shall exercise the election permitted under section 83(b) of the Code with respect to any Award without the prior written approval of the General Counsel or the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Any Holder who makes an election under section 83(b) of the Code with respect to any Award without the prior written approval of the General Counsel or the Chief Financial Officer of the Company may, in the discretion of the Committee, forfeit any or all Awards granted to him or her under the Plan.

4.7       Forfeiture for Cause. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or an Award Agreement, if the Committee finds by a majority vote that a Holder, before or after his or her Separation from Service (a) committed a felony or a crime involving moral turpitude or committed any other act or omission involving fraud, embezzlement or any other act of dishonesty in the course of his or her employment by the Company or an Affiliate which conduct damaged the Company or an Affiliate; (b) substantially and repeatedly failed to perform duties of the office held by the Holder as reasonably directed by the Company or an Affiliate; (c) committed gross negligence or willful misconduct with respect to the Company or an Affiliate; (d) committed a material breach of any employment agreement between the Holder and the Company or an Affiliate that is not cured within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice thereof from the Company or the Affiliate, as applicable; (e) failed, within ten (10) days after receipt by the Holder of written notice thereof from the Company or an Affiliate, to correct, cease or otherwise alter any failure to comply with instructions or other action or omission which the Board reasonably believes does or may materially or adversely affect the Company’s or an Affiliate’s business or operations; (f) committed misconduct which is of such a serious or substantial nature that a reasonable likelihood exists that such misconduct will materially injure the reputation of the Company or an Affiliate; (g) harassed or discriminated against the Company’s or an Affiliate’s employees, customers or vendors in violation of the Company’s policies with respect to such matters; (h) misappropriated funds or assets of the Company or an Affiliate for personal use or willfully violated the Company policies or standards of business conduct as determined in good faith by the Board; (i) failed, due to some action or inaction on the part of the Holder, to have immigration status that permits the Holder to maintain full-time employment with the Company or an Affiliate in the United States in compliance with all applicable immigration law; (j) disclosed trade secrets of the Company or an Affiliate, then as of the date the Committee makes its finding, any Awards awarded to the Holder that have not been exercised by the Holder (including all Awards that have not yet vested) will be forfeited to the Company. The findings and decision of the Committee or the Board, if applicable, with respect to such matter, including those regarding the acts of the Holder and the damage done to the Company, will be final for all purposes. No decision of the Committee, however, will affect the finality of the discharge of the individual by the Company or an Affiliate.

4.8       Forfeiture Events. The Committee may specify in an Award Agreement that the Holder’s rights, payments, and benefits with respect to an Award shall be subject to reduction, cancellation, forfeiture, or recoupment upon the occurrence of certain specified events, in addition to any otherwise applicable vesting or performance conditions of an Award. Such events may include, but shall not be limited to, Separation from Service for cause, Separation from Service for any other reason, violation of material policies of the Company and its Affiliates, breach of noncompetition, confidentiality, or other restrictive covenants that may apply to the Holder, or other conduct by the Holder that is detrimental to the business or reputation of the Company and its Affiliates.

58

4.9       Award Agreements. Each Award shall be embodied in a written Award Agreement that shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan. The Award Agreement shall be signed by an executive officer of the Company, other than the Holder, on behalf of the Company, and may be signed by the Holder to the extent required by the Committee. The Award Agreement may specify the effect of a change in control of the Company on the Award. The Award Agreement may contain any other provisions that the Committee in its discretion shall deem advisable which are not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of the Plan.

4.10       Amendments of Award Agreements. The terms of any outstanding Award under the Plan may be amended from time to time by the Committee in its discretion in any manner that it deems appropriate and that is consistent with the terms of the Plan or necessary to implement the requirements of the Plan. However, no such amendment shall adversely affect in a material manner any right of a Holder without his or her written consent. Except as specified in Section 4.5(b), the Committee may not directly or indirectly lower the exercise price of a previously granted Option or the grant price of a previously granted SAR.

4.11       Rights as Stockholder. A Holder shall not have any rights as a stockholder with respect to Stock covered by an Option, a SAR, an RSU, a Performance Unit, or an Other Stock-Based Award payable in Stock until the date, if any, such Stock is issued by the Company; and, except as otherwise provided in Section 4.5, no adjustment for dividends, or otherwise, shall be made if the record date therefor is prior to the date of issuance of such Stock.

4.12       Issuance of Shares of Stock. Shares of Stock, when issued, may be represented by a certificate or by book or electronic entry.

4.13       Restrictions on Stock Received. The Committee may impose such conditions and/or restrictions on any shares of Stock issued pursuant to an Award as it may deem advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a requirement that the Holder hold the shares of Stock for a specified period of time.

4.14       Compliance With Section 409A. Awards shall be designed, granted and administered in such a manner that they are either exempt from the application of, or comply with, the requirements of Section 409A. The Plan and each Award Agreement under the Plan that is intended to comply the requirements of Section 409A shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with such intent. If the Committee determines that an Award, Award Agreement, payment, distribution, deferral election, transaction, or any other action or arrangement contemplated by the provisions of the Plan would, if undertaken, cause a Holder to become subject to additional taxes under Section 409A, then unless the Committee specifically provides otherwise, such Award, Award Agreement, payment, distribution, deferral election, transaction or other action or arrangement shall not be given effect to the extent it causes such result and the related provisions of the Plan and/or Award Agreement will be deemed modified, or, if necessary, suspended in order to comply with the requirements of Section 409A to the extent determined appropriate by the Committee, in each case without the consent of or notice to the Holder. The exercisability of an Option or a SAR shall not be extended to the extent that such extension would subject the Holder to additional taxes under Section 409A.

Although the Company will use its best efforts to avoid the imposition of taxation, interest and penalties under Section 409A, the tax treatment of the benefits provided under the Plan is not warranted or guaranteed. Neither the Company, its Affiliates nor their respective directors, officers, employees or advisers shall be held liable for any taxes, interest, penalties or other monetary amounts owed by a Holder (or any other individual claiming a benefit through Holder) as a result of the Plan.

4.15       Date of Grant. The date on which an option or SAR is granted shall be the date the Company completes the corporate action constituting an offer of stock for sale to a Holder under the terms and conditions of the Option or SAR; provided that such corporate action shall not be considered complete until the date on which the maximum number of shares that can be purchased under the Option and the minimum Option price are fixed or determinable. If the corporate action contemplates an immediate offer of stock for sale to a class of individuals, then the date of the granting of an Option is the time or date of that corporate action, if the offer is to be made immediately. If the corporate action contemplates a particular date on which the offer is to be made, then the date of grant is the contemplated date of the offer.

4.16       Source of Shares Deliverable Under Awards. Any shares of Stock delivered pursuant to an Award may consist, in whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares of Stock or of treasury shares of Stock.

59


Article V

OPTIONS

5.1Authority to Grant Options. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant Options under the Plan to eligible persons in such number and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine; provided that ISOs may be granted only to eligible Employees of the Company or of any Parent Corporation or Subsidiary Corporation (as permitted by section 422 of the Code and the regulations thereunder).

5.2Type of Options Available. Options granted under the Plan may be NQSOs or ISOs.

5.3Option Agreement. Each Option grant under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify (a) whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or an NQSO, (b) the Option Price, (c) the duration of the Option, (d) the number of shares of Stock to which the Option pertains, (e) the exercise restrictions, if any, applicable to the Option, and (f) such other provisions as the Committee shall determine that are not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of the Plan. Notwithstanding the designation of an Option as an ISO in the applicable Award Agreement for such Option, to the extent the limitations of Section 5.11 of the Plan are exceeded with respect to the Option, the portion of the Option in excess of the limitation shall be treated as a NQSO. An Option granted under the Plan may not be granted with any Dividend Equivalents rights.

5.4Option Price. The price at which shares of Stock may be purchased under an Option (the “Option Price”) shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock on the date the Option is granted; provided, however, if the Option is an ISO granted to a Ten Percent Stockholder, the Option Price must not be less than one hundred ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock on the date the ISO is granted. Subject to the limitations set forth in the preceding sentences of this Section 5.4, the Committee shall determine the Option Price for each grant of an Option under the Plan.

5.5Duration of Option. An Option shall not be exercisable after the earlier of (a) the general term of the Option specified in the applicable Award Agreement (which shall not exceed ten years, or, in the case of a Ten Percent Stockholder, no ISO shall be exercisable later than the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date of its grant), or (b) the period of time specified in the applicable Award Agreement that follows the Holder’s Separation from Service.

5.6Amount Exercisable. Each Option may be exercised at the time, in the manner and subject to the conditions the Committee specifies in the Award Agreement in its sole discretion.

5.7Exercise of Option.

(a)General Method of Exercise. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, Options may be exercised in whole or in part from time to time by the delivery of written notice in the manner designated by the Committee. Except in the case of exercise by a third party broker or through a net exercise as provided below, in order for the notice to be effective the notice must be accompanied by payment of the Option Price by any combination of the following in accordance with the applicable Award Agreement: (v) cash, certified check, bank draft or postal or express money order for an amount equal to the Option Price under the Option; (w) Mature Shares with a Fair Market Value on the date of exercise equal to the Option Price under the Option; (x) an election to make a cashless exercise through a registered broker-dealer; (y) an election to affect a net exercise directing the Company to reduce the number of shares of Stock that will be delivered pursuant to the exercise of the Option; or (z) except as specified below, any other form of payment which is acceptable to the Committee. If Mature Shares are used for payment by the Holder, the aggregate Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock tendered must be equal to or less than the aggregate Option Price of the shares of Stock being purchased upon exercise of the Option, and any difference must be paid by cash, certified check, bank draft or postal or express money order payable to the order of the Company.

60


If, at the time of receipt by the Company or its delegate of such written notice, (i) the Company has unrestricted surplus in an amount not less than the Option Price of such shares of Stock; (ii) all accrued cumulative preferential dividends and other current preferential dividends on all outstanding shares of preferred stock of the Company have been fully paid; (iii) the acquisition by the Company of its own shares of Stock for the purpose of enabling such Holder to exercise such Option is otherwise permitted by applicable law, does not require any vote or consent of any stockholder of the Company and does not violate the terms of any agreement to which the Company is a party or by which it is bound, and (iv) there shall have been adopted, and there shall be in full force and effect, a resolution of the Board authorizing the acquisition by the Company of its own shares of stock for such purpose, then such Holder may deliver to the Company, in payment of the Option Price of the shares of Stock with respect to which such Option is exercised, (x) certificates registered in the name of such Holder that represent a number of shares of stock legally and beneficially owned by such Holder and having a Fair Market Value on the date of receipt by the Company or its delegate of such written notice that is not greater than the Option Price of the shares of Stock with respect to which such Option is to be exercised, such certificates to be accompanied by stock powers duly endorsed in blank by the record holder of the shares of Stock represented by such certificates, with the signature of such record holder guaranteed by a national banking association, and (y) if the Option Price of the shares of Stock with respect to which such Option is to be exercised exceeds such Fair Market Value, a cashier’s check drawn on a national banking association and payable to the order of the Company, in an amount, in United States dollars, equal to the amount of such excess. Notwithstanding the provisions of the immediately preceding sentence, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may refuse to accept shares of Stock in payment of the Option Price of the shares of Stock with respect to which such Option is to be exercised and, in that event, any certificates representing shares of Stock that were received by the Company or its delegate with such written notice shall be returned to such Holder, together with notice by the Company or its delegate to such Holder of the refusal of the Committee to accept such shares of Stock. If, at the expiration of seven (7) business days after the delivery to such Holder of such written notice from the Company or its delegate, such Holder shall not have delivered to the Company or its delegate a cashier’s check drawn on a national banking association and payable to the order of the Company in an amount, in United States dollars, equal to the Option Price of the shares of Stock with respect to which such Option is to be exercised, such written notice from the Holder to the Company or its delegate shall be ineffective to exercise such Option.

(b)Issuance of Shares. Subject to Section 4.3 and Section 5.7(c), as promptly as practicable after receipt of written notification and payment, in the form required by Section 5.7(a), of an amount of money necessary to satisfy any withholding tax liability that may result from the exercise of such Option, the Company shall deliver to the Holder certificates for the number of shares with respect to which the Option has been exercised, issued in the Holder’s name. Delivery of the shares shall be deemed effected for all purposes when a stock transfer agent of the Company shall have deposited the certificates in the United States mail, addressed to the Holder, at the address specified by the Holder or shall have transferred to the account designated by the Holder to which the shares of Stock represented by book or electronic entry are to be delivered.

(c)Cashless Exercise and Net Exercise. The Committee may permit a Holder to elect to pay the Option Price and any applicable tax withholding resulting from such exercise by (i) authorizing a third-party broker to sell all or a portion of the shares of Stock acquired upon exercise of the Option and remit to the Company a sufficient portion of the sale proceeds to pay the Option Price and any applicable federal, state, local and foreign tax withholding resulting from such exercise; or (ii) directing the Company to reduce the number of shares of Stock that will be delivered pursuant to the exercise of the Option.

(d)Limitations on Exercise Alternatives. Except in the event the Option Price is paid pursuant to Section 5.7(c), the Committee shall not permit a Holder to pay such Holder’s Option Price upon the exercise of an Option by using shares of Stock other than Mature Shares. An Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a share of Stock.

5.8Transferability—Incentive Stock Options. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or an Award Agreement to the contrary, no ISO granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and all ISOs granted to an Employee under this Article V shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by such Employee.

5.9Notification of Disqualifying Disposition. If any Employee shall make any disposition of shares of Stock issued pursuant to the exercise of an ISO under the circumstances described in section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), such Employee shall notify the Company of such disposition within ten (10) days thereof.

5.10No Rights as Stockholder. A Holder of an Option shall not have any rights as a stockholder with respect to Stock covered by an Option until the date a stock certificate for such Stock is issued by the Company; and, except as otherwise provided in Section 4.5, no adjustment for dividends, or otherwise, shall be made if the record date therefor is prior to the date of issuance of such certificate.

61

5.11$100,000 Limitation on ISOs. To the extent that the aggregate Fair Market Value of shares of Stock with respect to which ISOs first become exercisable by a Holder in any calendar year exceeds $100,000, taking into account both shares of Stock subject to ISOs under the Plan and Stock subject to ISOs under all other plans of the Company, such Options shall be treated as NQSOs. For this purpose, the “Fair Market Value” of the shares of Stock subject to Options shall be determined as of the date the Options were awarded. In reducing the number of Options treated as ISOs to meet the $100,000 limit, the most recently granted Options shall be reduced first. To the extent a reduction of simultaneously granted Options is necessary to meet the $100,000 limit, the Committee may, in the manner and to the extent permitted by law, designate which shares of Stock are to be treated as shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO.

5.12Separation from Service. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Holder of an Option shall have the right to exercise the Option following the Holder’s Separation from Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, need not be uniform among all Options issued pursuant to the Award Agreement or the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination.

Article VI

STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS

6.1Authority to Grant SAR Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant SARs under the Plan to eligible persons in such number and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall have complete discretion in determining the number of SARs granted to each Holder and, consistent with the provisions of the Plan, in determining the terms and conditions pertaining to such SARs.

6.2Type of Stock Appreciation Rights Available. The Committee may grant Freestanding SARs, Tandem SARs, or any combination of these forms of SARs.

6.3General Terms. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, a SAR granted under the Plan shall confer on the recipient a right to receive, upon exercise thereof, an amount equal to the excess of (a) the Fair Market Value of one share of the Stock on the date of exercise, over (b) the grant price of the SAR, which shall not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of one share of the Stock on the date of grant of the SAR. The grant price of Tandem SARs shall be equal to the Option Price of the related Option. A SAR granted under the Plan may not be granted with any Dividend Equivalents rights.

6.4SAR Agreement. Each Award of SARs granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that shall specify (a) the grant price of the SAR, (b) the term of the SAR, (c) the vesting and termination provisions of the SAR, and (d) such other provisions as the Committee shall determine that are not inconsistent with the terms and provisions of the Plan. The Committee may impose such additional conditions or restrictions on the exercise of any SAR as it may deem appropriate.

6.5Term of SAR. The term of a SAR granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion; provided that no SAR shall be exercisable on or after the tenth (10th) anniversary date of its grant. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, with respect to a Tandem SAR granted in connection with an ISO: (a) the Tandem SAR will expire no later than the expiration of the underlying ISO; (b) the value of the payout with respect to the Tandem SAR may be for no more than one hundred percent (100%) of the excess of the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock subject to the underlying ISO at the time the Tandem SAR is exercised over the Option Price of the underlying ISO; and (c) the Tandem SAR may be exercised only when the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock subject to the ISO exceeds the Option Price of the ISO.

6.6Exercise of Freestanding SARs. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, Freestanding SARs may be exercised in whole or in part from time to time by the delivery of written notice in the manner designated by the Committee stating (a) that the Holder wishes to exercise such SAR on the date such notice is so delivered, (b) the number of shares of Stock with respect to which the SAR is to be exercised, and (c) the address to which the payment due under such SAR should be delivered. In accordance with applicable law, a Freestanding SAR may be exercised upon whatever additional terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes.

6.7Exercise of Tandem SARs. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, Tandem SARs may be exercised for all or part of the shares of Stock subject to the related Option upon the surrender of the right to exercise the equivalent portion of the related Option and by the delivery of written notice in the manner designated by the Committee stating (a) that the Holder wishes to exercise such SAR on the date such notice is so delivered, (b) the number of shares of Stock with respect to which the SAR is to be exercised, and (c) the address to which the payment due under such SAR should be delivered. A Tandem SAR may be exercised only with respect to the shares of Stock for which its related Option is then exercisable. In accordance with applicable law, a Tandem SAR may be exercised upon whatever additional terms and conditions the Committee, in its sole discretion, imposes.

62

6.8Payment of SAR Amount. Upon the exercise of a SAR, a Holder shall be entitled to receive payment from the Company in an amount determined by multiplying the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of exercise over the grant price of the SAR by the number of shares of Stock with respect to which the SAR is exercised. At the discretion of the Committee, the payment upon SAR exercise may be in cash, in Stock of equivalent value, in some combination thereof or in any other manner approved by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee’s determination regarding the form of SAR payout shall be set forth in the Award Agreement pertaining to the grant of the SAR.

6.9Separation from Service. Each Award Agreement shall set forth the extent to which the Holder of a SAR shall have the right to exercise the SAR following the Holder’s Separation from Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee, may be included in the Award Agreement entered into with the Holder, need not be uniform among all SARs issued pursuant to the Plan, and may reflect distinctions based on the reasons for termination or severance.

6.10Nontransferability of SARs. Except as otherwise provided in a Holder’s Award Agreement, no SAR granted under the Plan may be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Further, except as otherwise provided in a Holder’s Award Agreement, all SARs granted to a Holder under the Plan shall be exercisable during his or her lifetime only by the Holder, and after that time, by the Holder’s heirs or estate. Any attempted assignment of a SAR in violation of this Section 6.10 shall be null and void.

6.11No Rights as Stockholder. A grantee of a SAR award, as such, shall have no rights as a stockholder.

6.12Restrictions on Stock Received. The Committee may impose such conditions and/or restrictions on any shares of Stock received upon exercise of a SAR granted pursuant to the Plan as it may deem advisable or desirable. These restrictions may include, but shall not be limited to, a requirement that the Holder hold the shares of Stock received upon exercise of a SAR for a specified period of time.

Article VII

RESTRICTED Stock AWARDS

7.1Restricted Stock Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may make Awards of Restricted Stock under the Plan to eligible persons in such number and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting, forfeiture and the transferability restrictions applicable to any Restricted Stock Award shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. If the Committee imposes vesting, forfeiture or transferability restrictions on a Holder’s rights with respect to Restricted Stock, the Committee may issue such instructions to the Company’s share transfer agent in connection therewith as it deems appropriate. The Committee may also cause the certificate for shares of Stock issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award to be imprinted with any legend which counsel for the Company considers advisable with respect to the restrictions or, should the shares of Stock be represented by book or electronic entry rather than a certificate, the Company may take such steps to restrict transfer of the shares of Stock as counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law.

7.2Restricted Stock Award Agreement. Each Restricted Stock Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that contains any vesting, forfeiture and transferability restrictions and other provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee may specify.

7.3Holder’s Rights as Stockholder. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, each recipient of a Restricted Stock Award shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares of Restricted Stock included in the Restricted Stock Award during the Period of Restriction established for the Restricted Stock Award. Dividends paid with respect to Restricted Stock in cash or property other than shares of Stock or rights to acquire shares of Stock shall be paid to the recipient of the Restricted Stock Award currently. Dividends paid in shares of Stock or rights to acquire shares of Stock shall be added to and become a part of the Restricted Stock. During the Period of Restriction, certificates representing the Restricted Stock shall be registered in the Holder’s name and bear a restrictive legend to the effect that ownership of such Restricted Stock, and the enjoyment of all rights appurtenant thereto, are subject to the restrictions, terms, and conditions provided in the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement. Such certificates shall be deposited by the recipient with the Secretary of the Company or such other officer or agent of the Company as may be designated by the Committee, together with all stock powers or other instruments of assignment, each endorsed in blank, which will permit transfer to the Company of all or any portion of the Restricted Stock which shall be forfeited in accordance with the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.

63

Article VIII

RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS

8.1Authority to Grant RSU Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant RSU Awards under the Plan to eligible persons in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting, forfeiture and the transferability restrictions applicable to any RSU Award shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee shall maintain a bookkeeping ledger account, which reflects the number of RSUs credited under the Plan for the benefit of a Holder.

8.2RSU Award. An RSU Award shall be similar in nature to a Restricted Stock Award except that no shares of Stock are actually transferred to the Holder until a later date specified in the applicable Award Agreement. Each RSU shall have a value equal to the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock.

8.3RSU Award Agreement. Each RSU Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that contains any Substantial Risk of Forfeiture, transferability and forfeiture restrictions, form and time of payment provisions and other provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee may specify.

8.4Dividend Equivalents. An Award Agreement for an RSU Award may specify that the Holder shall be entitled to the payment of Dividend Equivalents under the Award.


8.5Form of Payment Under RSU Award. Payment under an RSU Award shall be made in cash, shares of Stock or any combination thereof, as specified in the applicable Award Agreement.

 

8.6Time of Payment Under RSU Award. A Holder’s payment under an RSU Award shall be made at such time as is specified in the applicable Award Agreement. The Award Agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half (2 1/2) months after the end of the Fiscal Year in which the RSU Award payment is no longer subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture, or (b) as otherwise designated by the Committee.

 

8.7Holder’s Rights as Stockholder. Each recipient of an RSU Award shall have no rights of a stockholder with respect to the Holder’s RSUs. A Holder shall have no voting rights with respect to any RSU Awards.

 

Article IX

PERFORMANCE STOCK AWARDS and PERFORMANCE UNIT Awards

 

9.1Authority to Grant Performance Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant Performance Stock Awards and Performance Unit Awards under the Plan to eligible persons in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. The amount of, the vesting, forfeiture and the transferability restrictions applicable to any Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award shall be based upon the attainment of such Performance Goals as the Committee may determine; provided, however, that (a) the performance period for any Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award shall not be less than one (1) year, and (b) the Performance Goals must be established in writing by the Committee not later than ninety (90) days after the beginning of the performance period (but in no event after the outcome is substantially certain). If the Committee imposes vesting or transferability restrictions on a Holder’s rights with respect to Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Awards, the Committee may issue such instructions to the Company’s share transfer agent in connection therewith as it deems appropriate. The Committee may also cause the certificate for shares of Stock issued pursuant to a Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award to be imprinted with any legend which counsel for the Company considers advisable with respect to the restrictions or, should the shares of Stock be represented by book or electronic entry rather than a certificate, the Company may take such steps to restrict transfer of the shares of Stock as counsel for the Company considers necessary or advisable to comply with applicable law.

64

9.2Performance Goals. The Performance Goals upon which the payment or vesting of an Award may be based on one or more of the following business criteria that apply to the Holder, one or more business units or subsidiaries of the Company, or the Company as a whole: earnings, earnings before interest and taxes, earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, earnings before any one of, or combination of two or more of, interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and/or any other financial adjustment to earnings set forth in the Company’s audited financial statements that is allowed under generally accepted accounting principles, adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, net earnings, earnings per share, earnings per share growth, economic value added, economic value, operating profits, net operating profit, net profits, profit return, gross margin, profit margins, profit before tax, operating margin, cash return on capitalization, operating expense, operating expense as a percentage of revenue, revenue, increase in revenue, revenue ratios (including per employee or per customer), net revenue, billings, net income, stock price, market share, return on equity, return on assets, return on capital, return on capital compared to cost of capital, return on capital employed, return on invested capital, debt to capital ratio, total stockholder return, stockholder return, stockholder value, growth in stockholder value relative to a pre-determined index, financial return ratio, operating income, cash flow, net cash flow, cash flow from operations, free cash flow, cash value added performance, cost reductions, cost ratios (per employee or per customer), proceeds from dispositions, project completion time and budget goals, net cash flow before financing activities, customer growth, total market value, or people value added. The Committee may select one criterion or multiple criteria for measuring performance. Goals may be based on subjective performance criteria, provided the subjective criteria are bona fide and relate to the performance of the Holder or of the group that includes the Holder. Goals may also be based on performance relative to a peer group of companies. Unless otherwise stated, such a Performance Goal need not be based upon an increase or positive result under a particular business criterion and could include, for example, maintaining the status quo or limiting economic losses (measured, in each case, by reference to specific business criteria). Prior to the payment of any compensation based on the achievement of Performance Goals, the Committee must certify in writing that applicable Performance Goals and any of the material terms thereof were, in fact, satisfied. Subject to the foregoing provisions, the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to any Performance Stock or Performance Unit Awards made pursuant to the Plan shall be determined by the Committee.

 

9.3Written Agreement. Each Performance Stock Award or Performance Unit Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that contains any vesting, transferability restrictions and other provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee may specify.

 

9.4Form of Payment Under Performance Unit Award. Payment under a Performance Unit Award shall be made in cash, shares of Stock or any combination thereof, as specified in the applicable Award Agreement.

Important Notice Regarding9.5Time of Payment Under Performance Unit Award. A Holder’s payment under a Performance Unit Award shall be made at such time as is specified in the Availabilityapplicable Award Agreement. The Award Agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half (2 1/2) months after the end of Proxy Materialsthe calendar year in which the Performance Unit Award payment is no longer subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture, or (b) as otherwise designated by the Committee.

9.6Holder’s Rights as Stockholder With Respect to a Performance Stock Award. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, each Holder of a Performance Stock Award shall have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares of Stock issued to the Holder pursuant to the Award during any period in which such issued shares of Stock are subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transfer, including without limitation, the right to vote such shares of Stock.

9.7Dividend Equivalents. An Award Agreement for a Performance Unit Award may specify that the Holder shall be entitled to the payment of Dividend Equivalents under the Award.

Article X

Director Awards

All Awards to Directors shall be determined by the Board.

Article XI

ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE AWARDS

11.1Authority to Grant Annual Cash Incentive Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant Annual Cash Incentive Awards under the Plan upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. Subject to the following provisions in this Article XI, the amount of any Annual Cash Incentive Awards shall be based on the attainment of such Performance Goals as the Committee may determine and the term, conditions and limitations applicable to any Annual Cash Incentive Awards made pursuant to the Plan shall be determined by the Committee.

65

11.2Written Agreement. Each Annual Cash Incentive Award shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement that contains any vesting, transferability restrictions and other provisions not inconsistent with the Plan as the Committee may specify.

11.3Form of Payment Under Annual Cash Incentive Award. Payment under an Annual Cash Incentive Award shall be made in cash.

11.4Time of Payment Under Annual Cash Incentive Award. A Holder’s payment under an Annual Cash Incentive Award shall be made at such time as is specified in the applicable Award Agreement. The Award Agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half (2 1/2) months after the end of the calendar year in which the Annual Cash Incentive Award payment is no longer subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture, or (b) as otherwise designated by the Committee.

Article XII

Other Stock-Based Awards

12.1Authority to Grant Other Stock-Based Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related Awards not otherwise described by the terms and provisions of the Plan (including the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted shares of Stock) under the Plan to eligible persons in such number and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine. Such Awards may involve the transfer of actual shares of Stock to Holders, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of shares of Stock and may include, without limitation, Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the United States.

12.2Value of Other Stock-Based Award. Each Other Stock-Based Award shall be expressed in terms of shares of Stock or units based on shares of Stock, as determined by the Committee.

12.3Payment of Other Stock-Based Award. Payment, if any, with respect to an Other Stock-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Award, in cash, shares of Stock or any combination thereof, as the Committee determines.

12.4Separation from Service. The Committee shall determine the extent to which a Holder’s rights with respect to Other Stock-Based Awards shall be affected by the Holder’s Separation from Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee and need not be uniform among all Other Stock-Based Awards issued pursuant to the Plan.

12.5Time of Payment of Other Stock-Based Award. A Holder’s payment under an Other Stock-Based Award shall be made at such time as is specified in the applicable Award Agreement. If a payment under the Award Agreement is subject to Section 409A, the Award Agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half (2 1/2) months after the end of the calendar year in which the Other Stock-Based Award payment is no longer subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture, or (b) as otherwise designated by the Committee.

Article XIII

Cash-Based Awards

13.1Authority to Grant Cash-Based Awards. Subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee, at any time, and from time to time, may grant Cash-Based Awards under the Plan to eligible persons in such amounts and upon such terms as the Committee shall determine.

13.2Value of Cash-Based Award. Each Cash-Based Award shall specify a payment amount or payment range as determined by the Committee.

66

13.3Payment of Cash-Based Award. Payment, if any, with respect to a Cash-Based Award shall be made in accordance with the terms of the Award, in cash.

13.4Time of Payment of Cash-Based Award. Payment under a Cash-Based Award shall be made at such time as is specified in the applicable Award Agreement. If a payment under the Award Agreement is subject to Section 409A, the Award Agreement shall specify that the payment will be made (a) by a date that is no later than the date that is two and one-half (2 1/2) months after the end of the calendar year in which the Cash-Based Award payment is no longer subject to a Substantial Risk of Forfeiture, or (b) as otherwise designated by the Committee.

13.5Separation from Service. The Committee shall determine the extent to which a Holder’s rights with respect to Cash-Based Awards shall be affected by the Holder’s Separation from Service. Such provisions shall be determined in the sole discretion of the Committee and need not be uniform among all Cash-Based Awards issued pursuant to the Plan.

Article XIV

SUBSTITUTION AWARDS

Awards may be granted under the Plan from time to time in substitution for stock options and other awards held by employees of other entities who are about to become Employees, or whose employer is about to become an Affiliate as the result of a merger or consolidation of the Company with another corporation, or the acquisition by the Company of substantially all the assets of another corporation, or the acquisition by the Company of at least fifty percent (50%) of the issued and outstanding stock of another corporation as the result of which such other corporation will become a subsidiary of the Company. The terms and conditions of the substitute Awards so granted may vary from the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan to such extent as the Board at the time of grant may deem appropriate to conform, in whole or in part, to the provisions of the awards in substitution for which they are granted. If shares of Stock are issued under the Plan with respect to an Award granted under this Article such shares of Stock will not count against the aggregate number of shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan.

Article XV

ADMINISTRATION

15.1Awards. The Plan shall be administered by the Committee or, in the absence of the Committee or in the case of awards issued to Directors, the Plan shall be administered by the Board. The members of the Committee (that is not itself the Board) shall serve at the discretion of the Board. The Committee shall have full and exclusive power and authority to administer the Plan and to take all actions that the Plan expressly contemplates or are necessary or appropriate in connection with the administration of the Plan with respect to Awards granted under the Plan.

15.2Authority of the Committee. The Committee shall have full and exclusive power to interpret and apply the terms and provisions of the Plan and Awards made under the Plan, and to adopt such rules, regulations and guidelines for implementing the Plan as the Committee may deem necessary or proper, all of which powers shall be exercised in the best interests of the Company and in keeping with the objectives of the Plan. A majority of the members of the Committee shall constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting:transaction of business relating to the Plan or Awards made under the Plan, and the vote of a majority of those members present at any meeting shall decide any question brought before that meeting. Any decision or determination reduced to writing and signed by a majority of the members shall be as effective as if it had been made by a majority vote at a meeting properly called and held. All questions of interpretation and application of the Plan, or as to Awards granted under the Plan, shall be subject to the determination, which shall be final and binding, of a majority of the whole Committee. No member of the Committee shall be liable for any act or omission of any other member of the Committee or for any act or omission on his or her own part, including but not limited to the exercise of any power or discretion given to him or her under the Plan, except those resulting from his or her own willful misconduct. In carrying out its authority under the Plan, the Committee shall have full and final authority and discretion, including but not limited to the following rights, powers and authorities to (a) determine the persons to whom and the time or times at which Awards will be made; (b) determine the number and exercise price of shares of Stock covered in each Award subject to the terms and provisions of the Plan; (c) determine the terms, provisions and conditions of each Award, which need not be identical and need not match the default terms set forth in the Plan; (d) accelerate the time at which any outstanding Award will vest; (e) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to administration of the Plan; and (f) make all other determinations and take all other actions deemed necessary, appropriate or advisable for the proper administration of the Plan.

67

The NoticeCommittee may make an Award to an individual who the Company expects to become an Employee of the Company or any of its Affiliates within six (6) months after the date of grant of the Award, with the Award being subject to and Proxy Statementconditioned on the individual actually becoming an Employee within that time period and Annual Report Wrapper are available at www.proxyvote.com.subject to other terms and conditions as the Committee may establish.

 

The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan or in any Award to a Holder in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems necessary or desirable to further the Plan’s objectives. Further, the Committee shall make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. As permitted by law and the terms and provisions of the Plan, the Committee may delegate to one or more of its members or to one or more officers of the Company, and/or its Affiliates or to one or more agents or advisors such administrative duties or powers as it may deem advisable, and the Committee or any person to whom it has delegated duties or powers as aforesaid may employ one or more persons to render advice with respect to any responsibility the Committee or such person may have under the Plan. The Committee may, by resolution, authorize one or more officers of the Company to do one or more of the following on the same basis as can the Committee: (a) designate Employees to be recipients of Awards; (b) designate Third Party Service Providers to be recipients of Awards; and (c) determine the size of any such Awards; provided, however, (i) the Committee shall not delegate such responsibilities to any such officer for Awards granted to an Employee that is considered an Insider; (ii) the resolution providing such authorization sets forth the total number of Awards such officer(s) may grant; and (iii) the officer(s) shall report periodically to the Committee regarding the nature and scope of the Awards granted pursuant to the authority delegated. The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants, agents, and other persons, any of whom may be an Employee, and the Committee, the Company, and its officers and Board shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions, or valuations of any such persons.

 

15.3Decisions Binding. All determinations and decisions made by the Committee or the Board, as the case may be, pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and all related orders and resolutions of the Committee or the Board, as the case may be, shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including the Company, its Affiliates, its stockholders, Holders and the estates and beneficiaries of Holders.

 

15.4No Liability. Under no circumstances shall the Company, its Affiliates, the Board or the Committee incur liability for any indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages (including lost profits) of any form incurred by any person, whether or not foreseeable and regardless of the form of the act in which such a claim may be brought, with respect to the Plan or the Company’s, its Affiliates’, the Committee’s or the Board’s roles in connection with the Plan.

 

Article XVI

AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN

 

16.1Amendment, Modification, Suspension, and Termination. Subject to Section 16.2, the Board may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate the Plan and the Committee may, at any time and from time to time, alter, amend, modify, suspend, or terminate any Award Agreement in whole or in part; provided, however, that, without the prior approval of the Company’s stockholders and except as provided in Section 4.5, the Committee shall not directly or indirectly lower the Option Price of a previously granted Option or the grant price of a previously granted SAR, cancel a previously granted Option or previously granted SAR for a payment of cash or other property if the aggregate fair market value of such Award is less than the aggregate Option Price of such Award in the case of an Option or the aggregate grant price of such Award in the case of a SAR, and no amendment of the Plan shall be made without stockholder approval if stockholder approval is required by applicable law or stock exchange rules.

 

16.2Awards Previously Granted. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, no termination, amendment, suspension, or modification of the Plan or an Award Agreement shall adversely affect in any material way any Award previously granted under the Plan, without the written consent of the Holder holding such Award.

 

E25185-P87860

RIGNET, INC.Article XVII

MISCELLANEOUS

Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 3, 2017 10:00 AM (Central Daylight Time)
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby appoints Steven E. Pickett, Charles Schneider and William Sutton, jointly and severally, as the undersigned’s proxy or proxies, each with full power of substitution and to act without the other, to vote in the manner directed herein all shares of common stock of RigNet, Inc. which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Houston Marriot Energy Corridor- Reata Ballroom, 16011 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas 77094 and any postponements or adjournments thereof, as fully as the undersigned could if personally present, revoking any proxy or proxies heretofore given. 

The Board of Directors of the Company recommends a vote "FOR" all nominees for director, "1 YEAR" intervals as the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation and "FOR" all other proposals.
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted "FOR" all nominees for director, "1 YEAR" as the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation and "FOR" all other proposals. In their discretion, the proxies named above are authorized to vote upon such other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof and other matters permitted by Rule 14a-4(c) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

You are encouraged to specify your choice by marking the appropriate box (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any box if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendation. The Named Proxies cannot vote your shares unless you sign and return this card. 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

V.1.1

 

17.1Unfunded Plan/No Establishment of a Trust Fund. Holders shall have no right, title, or interest whatsoever in or to any investments that the Company or any of its Affiliates may make to aid in meeting obligations under the Plan. Nothing contained in the Plan, and no action taken pursuant to its provisions, shall create or be construed to create a trust of any kind, or a fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Holder, beneficiary, legal representative, or any other person. To the extent that any person acquires a right to receive payments from the Company under the Plan, such right shall be no greater than the right of an unsecured general creditor of the Company. All payments to be made hereunder shall be paid from the general funds of the Company and no special or separate fund shall be established and no segregation of assets shall be made to assure payment of such amounts, except as expressly set forth in the Plan. No property shall be set aside nor shall a trust fund of any kind be established to secure the rights of any Holder under the Plan. The Plan is not intended to be subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

68

17.2 No Employment Obligation. The granting of any Award shall not constitute an employment or service contract, express or implied, and shall not impose upon the Company or any Affiliate any obligation to employ or continue to employ, or to utilize or continue to utilize the services of, any Holder. The right of the Company or any Affiliate to terminate the employment of, or the provision of services by, any person shall not be diminished or affected by reason of the fact that an Award has been granted to him, and nothing in the Plan or an Award Agreement shall interfere with or limit in any way the right of the Company or its Affiliates to terminate any Holder’s employment or service relationship at any time or for any reason not prohibited by law.

17.3Tax Withholding. The Company or any Affiliate shall be entitled to deduct from other compensation payable to each Holder any sums required by federal, state, local or foreign tax law to be withheld with respect to the vesting or exercise of an Award or lapse of restrictions on an Award. In the alternative, the Company may require the Holder (or other person validly exercising the Award) to pay such sums for taxes directly to the Company or any Affiliate in cash or by check within one day after the date of vesting, exercise or lapse of restrictions. In the discretion of the Committee, and with the consent of the Holder, the Company may reduce the number of shares of Stock issued to the Holder upon such Holder’s exercise of an Award or the vesting of an Award to satisfy the tax withholding obligations of the Company or an Affiliate.

The Committee may, in its discretion, permit a Holder to satisfy any tax-withholding obligation arising upon the vesting of or payment under an Award by delivering to the Holder a reduced number of shares of Stock in the manner specified herein. If permitted by the Committee and acceptable to the Holder, at the time of vesting of shares under the Award, the Company shall (a) calculate the amount of the Company’s or an Affiliate’s tax withholding obligation on the assumption that all such shares of Stock vested under the Award are made available for delivery; (b) reduce the number of such shares of Stock made available for delivery so that the Fair Market Value of the shares of Stock withheld on the vesting date approximates the Company’s or an Affiliate’s tax withholding obligation; and (c) in lieu of the withheld shares of Stock, remit cash to the United States Treasury and/or other applicable governmental authorities, on behalf of the Holder, in the amount of the tax withholding obligation. The Company shall withhold only whole shares of Stock to satisfy its tax-withholding obligation. Where the Fair Market Value of the withheld shares of Stock does not equal the amount of the tax withholding obligation, the Company shall withhold shares of Stock with a Fair Market Value slightly less than the amount of the tax withholding obligation and the Holder must satisfy the remaining minimum withholding obligation in some other manner permitted under this Section 17.3. The withheld shares of Stock not made available for delivery by the Company shall be retained as treasury shares or will be cancelled and the Holder’s right, title and interest in such shares of Stock shall terminate.

The Company shall have no obligation upon vesting or exercise of any Award or lapse of restrictions on an Award until the Company or an Affiliate has received payment sufficient to cover the tax withholding obligation with respect to that vesting, exercise or lapse of restrictions. Neither the Company nor any Affiliate shall be obligated to advise a Holder of the existence of the tax or the amount which it will be required to withhold.

17.4Indemnification of the Committee. The Company shall indemnify each past, present and future member of the Committee against, and each member of the Committee shall be entitled without further action on his or her part to indemnity from the Company for, all expenses (including attorney’s fees, the amount of judgments and the amount of approved settlements made with a view to the curtailment of costs of litigation, other than amounts paid to the Company itself) reasonably incurred by such member in connection with or arising out of any action, suit or proceeding in which such member may be involved by reason of such member being or having been a member of the Committee, whether or not he or she continues to be a member of the Committee at the time of incurring the expenses, including, without limitation, matters as to which such member shall be finally adjudged in any action, suit or proceeding to have been negligent in the performance of such member’s duty as a member of the Committee. However, this indemnity shall not include any expenses incurred by any member of the Committee in respect of matters as to which such member shall be finally adjudged in any action, suit or proceeding to have been guilty of willful misconduct in the performance of his or her duty as a member of the Committee. In addition, no right of indemnification under the Plan shall be available to or enforceable by any member of the Committee unless, within sixty (60) days after institution of any action, suit or proceeding, such member shall have offered the Company, in writing, the opportunity to handle and defend same at its own expense. This right of indemnification shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors or administrators of each member of the Committee and shall be in addition to all other rights to which a member of the Committee may be entitled as a matter of law, contract or otherwise.

69

17.5Gender and Number. If the context requires, words of one gender when used in the Plan shall include the other and words used in the singular or plural shall include the other.

17.6Severability. In the event any provision of the Plan shall be held illegal or invalid for any reason, the illegality or invalidity shall not affect the remaining parts of the Plan, and the Plan shall be construed and enforced as if the illegal or invalid provision had not been included.

17.7Headings. Headings of Articles and Sections are included for convenience of reference only and do not constitute part of the Plan and shall not be used in construing the terms and provisions of the Plan.

17.8Other Compensation Plans. The adoption of the Plan shall not affect any other option, incentive or other compensation or benefit plans in effect for the Company or any Affiliate, nor shall the Plan preclude the Company from establishing any other forms of incentive compensation arrangements for Employees, Directors or Third Party Service Providers.

17.9Retirement and Welfare Plans. Neither Awards made under the Plan nor shares of Stock or cash paid pursuant to such Awards, may be included as “compensation” for purposes of computing the benefits payable to any person under the Company’s or any Affiliate’s retirement plans (both qualified and non-qualified) or welfare benefit plans unless such other plan expressly provides that such compensation shall be taken into account in computing a participant’s benefit.

17.10Other Awards. The grant of an Award shall not confer upon the Holder the right to receive any future or other Awards under the Plan, whether or not Awards may be granted to similarly situated Holders, or the right to receive future Awards upon the same terms or conditions as previously granted.

17.11Successors. All obligations of the Company under the Plan with respect to Awards granted hereunder shall be binding on any successor to the Company, whether the existence of such successor is the result of a direct or indirect purchase, merger, consolidation, or otherwise, of all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company.

17.12Law Limitations/Governmental Approvals. The granting of Awards and the issuance of shares of Stock under the Plan shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by any governmental agencies or national securities exchanges as may be required.

17.13Delivery of Title. The Company shall have no obligation to issue or deliver evidence of title for shares of Stock issued under the Plan prior to (a) obtaining any approvals from governmental agencies that the Company determines are necessary or advisable, and (b) completion of any registration or other qualification of the Stock under any applicable national or foreign law or ruling of any governmental body that the Company determines to be necessary or advisable.

17.14Inability to Obtain Authority. The inability of the Company to obtain authority from any regulatory body having jurisdiction, which authority is deemed by the Company’s counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any shares of Stock hereunder, shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such shares of Stock as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained.

17.15Investment Representations. The Committee may require any person receiving Stock pursuant to an Award under the Plan to represent and warrant in writing that the person is acquiring the shares of Stock for investment and without any present intention to sell or distribute such Stock.

17.16Persons Residing Outside of the United States. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in order to comply with the laws in other countries in which the Company or any of its Affiliates operates or has employees, the Committee, in its sole discretion, shall have the power and authority to (a)determine which Affiliates shall be covered by the Plan; (b) determine which persons employed outside the United States are eligible to participate in the Plan; (c) amend or vary the terms and provisions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of any Award granted to persons who reside outside the United States; (d) establish subplans and modify exercise procedures and other terms and procedures to the extent such actions may be necessary or advisable—any subplans and modifications to Plan terms and procedures established under this Section 17.16 by the Committee shall be attached to the Plan document as Appendices; and (e) take any action, before or after an Award is made, that it deems advisable to obtain or comply with any necessary local government regulatory exemptions or approvals. Notwithstanding the above, the Committee may not take any actions hereunder, and no Awards shall be granted, that would violate the Exchange Act, the Code, any securities law or governing statute or any other applicable law.

70

17.17Settlement of Disputes. Any controversy arising out of or relating to the Plan or an Award Agreement shall be resolved by solely and exclusively by the state and federal courts in Houston, Texas.

17.18No Fractional Shares. No fractional shares of Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan or any Award. The Committee shall determine whether cash, additional Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of fractional shares of Stock or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

17.19Governing Law. The provisions of the Plan and the rights of all persons claiming thereunder shall be construed, administered and governed under the laws of the State of Delaware, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of the Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction. Unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement, recipients of an Award under the Plan are deemed to submit to the sole and exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal or state courts of the State of Texas to resolve any and all issues that may arise out of or relate to the Plan or any related Award Agreement.

71